We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The government's Children's Rights Referendum website has been found to be "not fair, equal or impartial" by the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court says Government's Referendum site 'not fair, equal or impartial'

The Supreme Court says the government’s literature is not impartial, and therefore an inappropriate use of public money.

Updated, 11:40

THE SUPREME COURT has upheld a challenge against the Government’s informational website and booklet on the Children’s Rights Referendum, finding that the government had “acted wrongfully” in spending money on a website which was “not fair, equal or impartial”.

The court this morning upheld a challenge from Dublin resident Mark McCrystal, who had claimed that the website, and a booklet distributed by the Department of Children and Youth Affairs, contained language which effectively advocated a Yes vote in the referendum.

The Supreme Court upheld McCrystal’s appeal after it was rejected by the High Court last week – and in a brief ruling today found that there were “extensive passages in the booklet and on the website which do not conform to the McKenna principles”.

Those principles, established by the Supreme Court in 1995, found that public funding and resources should not be used in a referendum campaign “to espouse a particular point of view”.

Chief Justice Susan Denham, delivering the ruling, said she did not consider it “either appropriate or necessary” to grant an injunction ordering the government to remove the website, however.

This was because “it is to be assumed that the respondents will cease distributing and publishing the material”. The website, which had been launched in September, was taken offline at 11:39am this morning.

“The Court has concluded that it is clear that there are extensive passages in the booklet and on the website which do not conform to the McKenna principles,” the Chief Justice said.

This material includes a misstatement, now admitted to be such, as to the effect of the Referendum.

The Court is satisfied that while not all of the website or the booklet are in breach of the McKenna principles, because of the overall structure of the booklet and website, it would not be appropriate for the Court to redact either.

Voting to still take place on Saturday

The literature had summarised the effects of the proposed referendum under five headings – ‘Dedicated Constitutional provisions for children’, ‘Protecting children and supporting families’, ‘Removing inequalities’, ‘Adoption: a second chance for children’, and ‘Recognising children in their own right’.

The polling order for the referendum is not affected by the ruling – meaning the ballot will still go ahead on Saturday, with counting to begin on Sunday morning – but the judgment could be a blow to the government’s hopes of an easy victory for the Yes side.

Denham said the case had been dealt with “as a matter of urgency” by both the High Court and the Supreme Court, given the obvious time pressures at stake in the referendum.

While she said the “substance of that [referendum] proposal is a matter for the people alone”, it was up to the court to rule on the matter at hand as soon as possible. A written judgment will be published on December 11.

The Government had come under criticism in both this referendum and in May’s vote on the Fiscal Compact, for distributing its own ‘impartial’ information booklets and publishing its own information website on the referendum – an apparent overlap of the role of the Referendum Commission, which has its own separate website and booklet.

Although most observers still expect the referendum to be passed on Saturday, the court’s finding – which effectively means the government literature is biased in favour of encouraging a Yes vote – could provide a late boost to the referendum’s opponents.

Read: Children’s referendum: Up to 2,000 people begin voting on islands

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.