TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Anti-litter lobby backs 50c tax on chewing gum

Irish Business Against Litter says it supports Phil Hogan’s proposal for a gum tax, warning that any tax needs to be steep.

A 50c tax on chewing gum might hit some people particularly hard, but businesses reckon it could stop litter.
A 50c tax on chewing gum might hit some people particularly hard, but businesses reckon it could stop litter.
Image: Mike Egerton/EMPICS Sport

AN ANTI-LITTER LOBBY has welcomed proposals to impose a 50c anti-litter tax on packets of chewing gum – after minister Phil Hogan said he had not ruled out the prospect.

Hogan told a new awareness campaign yesterday that he had not completely dismissed the idea of bringing in a tax on gum, in order to help fund the difficult operation of removing it from pavements and other areas.

The minister was speaking at the launch of an anti-littering awareness campaign by the Gum Litter Taskforce, at which it was revealed that the amount of chewing gum litter had fallen by 57 per cent in the last four years.

The taskforce is an industry body funded by Wrigley and Cadbury Kraft, who are putting €9.6 million into the anti-litter campaign over the next three years.

Irish Business Against Litter said it welcomed the idea of a tax on gum, but warned that the tax needed to be relatively severe in order to make a “meaningful contribution” to the cost of removing gum.

“Our research shows strong support for such a tax, not least among local authorities,” said IBAL chairman Tom Cavanagh.

“In Killarney, €300,000 was spent on new pavements two years ago. These are already covered from end to end by gum, and frustrated residents and business owners are calling for an outright ban on the product.”

The industry itself has reportedly argued that awareness campaigns such as the ones operated in the last few years are more effective at countering gum littering than putting a straightforward tax on the product.

IBAL has said it may be more sensible to allow biodegradable gum to be exempt from VAT, as this could encourage manufacturers to sell it on a larger scale.

A town councillor in Trim has previously argued the case for the town to become the first in Ireland to outlaw the sale of gum, saying the model of Singapore – where gum has been banned since 1994 – should be followed in Ireland.

Read: Councillor wants Trim to become Ireland’s first chewing gum-free town >

Read next:

Comments (39 Comments)

  • Chewing gum is only part of the litter problem we have. I am sick to death of seeing people throw whatever they happen to be finished with on the street right in front of me; cans, wrappers, bottles, cigarette packets etc. These people just don’t appear to think anything of committing this disgusting act and polluting our streets. Some of them are not far from bins when their littering either! And in parks and on streets we bizarrely have bags of dog crap all over the place – not enough bins. Not to mention the scandalous amount of fly tipping going on. It’s going to take more than tax and advertising to sort this out.

    Reply
  • What’s wrong with Ferguson’s nose?

    Reply
  • Fagan's 03/05/12 #

    Smart thinking with that photo. You can use it again, if there is a 50c charge added to the cost of a bottle of Scotch.

    Reply
  • Truly a sign that…
    *shades*
    the bubble has burst.

    YYYEEEEAAAAAHHHHH!

    Reply
  • Don’t we have litter wardens for this already employed by local councils. Surely if they did their job properly, they could fine people who litter and then we could use that money towards hiring more wardens, pavement cleaning etc

    Reply
    • I dont think I have ever seen a litter warden walking the street. Do they exist or are they just a call out service.

      A group of residents in our estate recently got together and did a great job cleaning up litter. I was pretty disgusting to see how quickly it was dirtied.

      Reply
    • We have litter wardens where I am, the guy for my area is lovely, he spends all day picking up crap, but I don’t think he has any power to give someone a fine, I must ask him about that..
      As for dogs mess, that’s supposed to be the dog wardens department, and they are definitely in short supply..

      Reply
  • With water charges on the way and now this we will soon have an epidemic of B.O, unflushed toilets and now bad breath.
    God help us.

    Reply
  • I have a sneaky feeling there will be people going to prison for the smuggling of chewing gum, in the future! :-)
    They can share a cell with the garlic smuggler…they’ll keep each other balanced!

    Reply
  • Does this mean that we’ll be allowed to throw our gum on the ground now since we’re paying for it to be cleaned up anyway?

    Reply
    • Most people already throw their gum and butts on the ground, hence the point of taxing the gum.

      Reply
    • but not the cigarettes ?

      Reply
    • Jerry I’m not a smoker but I’m still pretty confident cigarettes are heavily taxed already. Still doesn’t make throwing them all over the place any better though.

      Reply
    • Gary, I agree with you about the education and enforcement but this is about taxing a product because it causes a problem. If that principle was was adopted, you can imagine how many things would be taxed to prevent problems or pay for their after effects – cigarettes, alcohol gambling etc. I’m a non-smoker myself but I thought it ironic that our discussion began about a product, chewing gum, which is often used to help people give up smoking.

      Reply
  • Aarum 03/05/12 #

    It’s a good idea chewing gum on foot paths looks terrible, what worse when there’s a bin close by Irish people still throw/spit out chewing gum beside bins

    Reply
  • Rubbish Idea from rubbish minister.

    Reply
  • Another stupid idea, like the proposal to ban smoking in parks and on beaches. This is the type of legislation we get when the politicians no longer have a role in running the economy of the country. That’s all being done for them by the EU/IMF, so they have to justify their existence. I suppose Big Phil will be able to collect this tax from everyone who buys gum, so that will be a first for him !!

    Reply
    • Let me help you out here Jerry.
      A large percentage of waste taken from the streets (and elsewhere) are cigarette butts. To use an American example…
      “In the past decade, cigarette smoking in America has decreased 28%, yet cigarette butts remain the most littered item–in the U.S. and across the globe. Dropping cigarette butts to the ground, putting them in planters, and disposing of them in waterways is littering. The overall littering rate for cigarette butts is 65%, and tobacco products comprise 38% of all U.S. roadway litter.”

      From wiki…
      “Cigarette butts are the most littered item in the world, with 4.5 trillion discarded annually. The cellulose acetate butts are not biodegradable and, as a result, their chemical decomposition can take many decades.”

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2009/11/20/tech-environment-cigarette-butt.html
      “Cigarette butts are toxic to fish and should be labeled as toxic hazardous waste, U.S. researchers say.

      Scientists at San Diego State University say that a single cigarette butt containing a small amount of unburnt tobacco is enough to contaminate a litre of water and kill half of the fish swimming in it.”

      Reply
    • Smoking revenues generated by the state between 2001 and 2009 from €1billion to €1.2billion per year(http://www.revenue.ie/en/about/publications/tobacco-market.pdf).
      Smoking related costs to the healthcare system in Ireland €2.3billion per year (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0716/1224300821905.html).

      Reply
    • Fagan's 03/05/12 #

      I think it is a great idea, it saves the taxpayer money in cleaning costs, stops pathways looking like pock marked etc etc. Great idea and it should be applauded.

      Let’s not whine about everything.

      Reply
    • @ Gary Clowry. I take your point about cigarette butt litter but my argument is related to the pettiness of this proposal and other proposed legislation. If a 50% tax is proposed to fund the cleaning of chewing gum off the streets then it’s logical that a pro rata tax should be imposed on tobacco for the same purpose. That’s extremely unlikely to happen, as you have pointed out the revenue the government receives from the sale of tobacco products. It hasn’t happened despite the fact that it costs the healthcare system almost twice as much as the revenue raised by the government from cigarettes. How much of those healthcare costs are funded by private health insurance? It seems that cigarette butt litter poses a far more serious threat to our health and the environment, than does chewing gum, which is just unsightly, so why doesn’t the Minister for the Environment tackle the cigarettes first?

      Reply
    • Jerry cigarettes are already taxed to the point that smuggling has become rampant. It’s the law of diminishing return. Taxing them further would lower the tax revenue. Personally I’d prefer if there was more education about littering and more enforcement. However I don’t suppose chewing gum eaters can really complain as they are the ones throwing it on the ground.

      Reply
  • sticky situation

    Reply
  • Ha Ha …. I do not believe for one moment that the 50 c tax Will go to cleaning chewing gum off the pavements . I do not chew gum so i wont be paying this ta either , It is a horrible habit , Chewing gum!

    Reply
  • Hate the thing, I would love it to be banned outright but I suppose a 50c tax would be a small step in the right direction.

    Reply
    • Chewing gum is excellent for dental hygiene. Blaming the manufacturer for the gutter ignorance of the f*****s who litter the place with it is a typically Irish response.

      Reply
    • Tokidoll 03/05/12 #

      What about Singapore Jonathan…banned there since 1994 apparently

      Reply
    • @Jonathan it’s disgusting and it’s not actually excellent, it’s alright. Also, there’s a lot of less horrid substitutes for chewing gum that have the particular element of it which you refer too. Tokidoll yes that’s correct my uncle actually visited there and he praised the chewing gum ban and the cleanliness of their nation. It’s a pet hate in my family.

      Reply
    • @Tokidoll: So what?

      Reply
    • @Karl: disgusting is your subjective judgement. That it’s a pet hate in your family is irrelevant (and rather silly).

      I also visited Singapore and found it a soulless place, a glorified shopping mall peopled largely with materialistic drones. They call it “Disneyland with the death penalty”. Your account of it says nothing about chewing gum (though it is revealing about your uncle).

      Reply
    • @Jonathon not revealing at all about him, I know that for a fact. I wouldn’t give any major revelations about the personalities of any of my family in a public forum. It’s not silly that we don’t like it, it’s disgusting in how you keep something in your mouth for so long and worse so when you spit it on the path. Also calling my family silly because of our dislikes says it all about your stature. Also I believe I said the cleanliness which was a reference to the lack of chewing gum on pavements and how clean the area he was in was in general. Perhaps you went to a different area because I saw photo proof Jonathan and I’m an absolute clean freak(i wash my hands every chance I get and don’t touch anyone else’s stuff, I bring my own bed sheets on holiday in all) who was quite impressed.

      Reply
    • Tokidoll 03/05/12 #

      @Jonathan “So what?” Charming! You said it was a typically Irish response, I was pointing out that, as per the article, another country, Singapore, has gone a step further and banned it outright.

      Reply
    • Is there any chewing gum out there with no aspartame in it? I couldn’t find any after lunch one day, so I refused to buy it.. That stuff is made from aspartic acid (a neurotoxin) and methanol (wood alcohol)!

      Besides, even if you do grab some to freshen your breath, how hard is it to hang on to the wrapper and dispose of it responsibly, in a bin? Spitting it out on the street where people may walk on it, get it all over their shoes or clothes, and it’s a pain in the ass cleaning it up is not only disgusting, its massively inconsiderate too.

      Reply

Add New Comment