TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Bishop of Clonfert John Kirby apologises for child sex abuse remarks

The Bishop released a special message to the people of his diocese today.

Image: Photocall Ireland!

BISHOP JOHN KIRBY, who caused controversy earlier this month by stating he “hadn’t a clue” how paedophiles operated and believed child abuse was a “friendship that crossed a boundary”, has apologised for his remarks.

In a special message issued to the people in his diocese of Clonfert and read out at Masses, Bishop Kirby said he wished to apologise to survivors about the media interview he gave on 5 September.

“I may have given the general impression that I was somehow minimising the gravity of the criminal activity which we know to be child sexual abuse,” he said. “This was never my intention and I wish to apologise, especially to all survivors on this point.”

“The fact is that I reported the allegations to the civil authorities in the 1990s within days of becoming aware of the issue because I knew that crimes may have been committed.

What I failed to appreciate sufficiently at that time was the addictive and repetitive compulsion of sexual abuse.

“Unfortunately, my words last week, separated from their context, came across negatively. I am very sorry for any anxiety or embarrassment that I may have caused to the people in Clonfert or throughout the country,” he continued.

During the address, the bishop – who has admitted to moving two priests who had abused children to different parishes in the mid-1990s – reiterated his apology for the “serious mistakes” he made.

“As bishop, I take full responsibility for my actions,” he said, adding that it is important for the people of the diocese to know that he operates “very differently now”.

I cannot apologise enough to survivors of abuse for the pain that you suffer. I utterly condemn the actions of the two priests, referred to in the Review, who sexually abused in this diocese in the past. They betrayed a sacred trust and their crimes are reprehensible.  Both were quickly reported to the civil authorities and both were taken out of ministry.

He said he is not aware of any abuse allegations from the parishes to which the two priests in question were moved.

Bishop Kirby encouraged members of the diocese to read the Review of Safeguarding Practice carried out by the National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church. That report can be found here.

He said he is committed to updating and reviewing all diocesan safeguarding material at least once every three years. “While the past cannot be undone, I am confident that current procedures and practices throughout the Diocese of Clonfert meet best practice for safeguarding children,” he concluded.

Related: Support group says some Churchmen believe they are “above the law of the land”>

Diocese of Clonfert: “No written procedures for management of allegations”>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (57 Comments)

  • I believe the State should now move to determine how many priests were relocated to Third World Missions where controls and supervision would not only be lax but completely absent. Whatever about repeat offending that has come to light from ministries that these guys were moved on to in Ireland or The USA or Canada what do the records show with respect to moving these men on to Charity or Missionary work in the poorest parts of the world.

    Reply
  • Apologies are cheap, especially given the amount of time between the initial statement and the apology. It’s hard to see how his statement was taken out of context when he used such clear terms. This is just more of the “wounded healer” bullshit that we got from Brady when he refused to resign even though he had promised he would. The fact that, in the nineties, Kirby claims he still hadn’t heard of serial child sexual abuse shows he’s either a liar or grossly inept and certainly not suitable for leadership in an organisation that is heavily involved in the lives of thousands of children.

    Reply
  • If he was sincere he would have resigned

    Reply
  • An apology for a stupid remark. How about an apology for the abuse?

    Reply
    • Having apologised over and over and the effect being to give openings for Pope kickers to repeat over and over the predictable. On behalf of the ”98 in 100” whom you must mean to harm when you make your unqualified broad attack on Catholicism, I suggest that unexpected apologies should not be repeated.

      Reply
    • Ronan 16/09/12 #

      Is that you Cardinal Newman?

      Reply
    • This excuse for a man should resign immediately. The longer he leaves it the more repulsive he gets.

      Reply
    • Tom. People like Kirby have killed the Catholic Church here. When I think of the deeply spiritual, holy and generous clergy that I have met and known, priests who gave their heart, soul and life to their communities, every thing they had, and then you have the other half of the clergy, the jobbers, the climbers who look down on the others who give away their possessions.

      I’ll always remembers my Mother pointing out the dirty looks the priests were giving one other priest as he entered church. He gave away everything he ever had to the needy, lived in penury as a result and they hated him for that. That is the church and that it were they diverged from religion and became a corporation.

      Kirby needs a bit of instruction in Christianity and faith and humility.

      Reply
    • tomnewnewman, it was never an attack on Catholicism, this is about the evil group of men/women who were calling themselves the servants of God.

      Reply
    • Dan Man and Eileen thank you for your comments. It is people like the sincere holy people Dans mother mentioned, be they few or many that I feel compelled to defend and not the career administrators that tend to rise to the top in any human endeavour (I am not accusing any particular persons of such )

      Reply
  • Do the decent thing and hand in your robe, and any money or material goods you own should be handed over to the victims of this abuse

    Reply
  • Mr Kirby aided and abetted a phedophile ring.
    An apology doesn’t cut it.
    He should be locked up with his pervert friends!

    Reply
  • Thanks Tracy. Scary to know that people with knowledge of these crimes and also covered up these crimes can walk free.

    Reply
  • He took his time to apologise !!!!

    Reply
    • Was thinking the same. Why the delay?

      Reply
    • This was a letter read out at Sunday mass this weekend. All diocese that had a review published, had a locally prepared letter read out at Sunday masses last weekend with an apology, information on the review & where to get a copy. I assume that that wasn’t enough in Clonfert given Bishop Kirbys radio interview & this is a follow up. Seems like ages, but its the first chance to address all parishioners / sunday mass-goers.

      Reply
    • His original interview was in the general media, so why should his apology be limited to those at Sunday mass?
      I would suggest those offended were unlikely to be there.

      Reply
    • I don’t disagree with you Rommell. I was replying to the question of ‘why now’ as it was asked.
      I do think that there’s plenty of people in the parishes that deserved that apology today directly from him, so I haven’t a problem with him addressing parishioners directly. But yes, it only has integrity if its part of a much wider conversation of public apology & reparation.
      Long way to go on integrity part.

      Reply
    • it is all about testing the resolve of the public to see when and where the Hierarchy of the RCC can push this agenda to pretend all is ok here, move along, nothing to see here, and back to business as usual.
      Head guy Brown has been very quiet and deliberate to instruct his minion bishops and priests in how to go about the attrition that the people are being put through. This will continue until such time as you …. the people, begin to believe in these so called men of God again, after being told you are wrong to reject the whole church and that they have picked out the bad bits for you (now) so thrust them again..
      The truth and scale of this cover-up is but and ice-berg (90% is still below the surface).
      They must protect for if they do not they will die. People must protect for if they do not they will perish.
      Who will forget first?

      Reply
  • @tracey aiding and abetting, perverting the course of justice, conspiracy and where was his own morals ? This man cannot seriously believe in god

    Reply
  • I have a question: Given the volume of evidence the state has on this systematic abuse, why are the guards not simply arresting them?Are they in the process of this only it’s taking a long time? Or are they really out of the states reach due to canon law??? Would like to know if this is the case. Cheers

    Reply
    • Arresting who?nnThe abusers have been arrested. nnAs for bishops not reporting crimes, there are no mandatory reporting laws.

      Reply
    • The garda have a history of chasing down fugitive kids and returning them to institutions..the politicians, judiciary whole society was roped in..and kept schtumb. When we were kids we were threatened with the institutions (Letterfrack, Artane, etc.) if we got out of line. We knew which Christian Brothers to avoid…the usual Irish blind-eye syndrome.
      Your talking Francoist fascism..deep in the marrow of society. A culture of terror bred from infancy. Brainwash like Stalin and Goebbles only dreamed….honed and refined over two millennia of imperial predation(read the history of the institution).

      One of the horrors is that it is mostly women who supported these sky-pilots..mothers who dream of little paddy being a priest. The fathers tolerated it…but its women who worship these mumbo-jumbo wizards.

      If you want the origins of Irish psychosis and dysfunction..look no further.

      Reply
  • Calling people like this out on the moral rights and wrongs is pointless at this stage. The only way to effectively protest against the criminality in the church is to hit them where it hurts, in their pockets and on their reputation.
    They are like a multinational selling dangerous products amongst harmless products and should be treated as such.
    Boycott, product recall and jail time for any of the management knowingly covering up the problem.

    Reply
  • Now I’m saying at the outset, I’m NOT a christian so I’m looking from outside the church. But what is it with these clerics? They still don’t get it. I know they (the paedos and apologists for paedos) are a minority, but every evil action they do, or inane comment they make, destroys a thousand decent ones from the other priests who do not sin or grope any of their parishioners or kids.
    I wonder if there would be less sexually frustrated clergy in posts if not for the stupid and un-natural doctrine of celibacy? Jesus was a jew. G-d commanded his chosen people to go forth and be fruitful. It is a duty to marry and have offspring. And I would lay 100 to one that you’d get better pastoral advice on family matters from a rabbi than you would from any catholic priest.
    Not that the Vatican is in the habit of listening to advice. And what nonsense is the idea of papal infallibility? The Pope is human and cannot be otherwise. NO human can be infallible. Surely that has to be a theological impossibility in any religion, and the idea may even be an impertinence to G-d, for any who believe in one.
    Meanwhile, the church sinks further in the estimation of mankind.

    Reply
  • The Bishop is trying to justify his actions by pleading ignorance. The dogs on the street knew what was going on here and he was informed at the time exactly what was occurring. After a court hearing for one of the priests in question where the details of the abuse were spelt out the near tearful embrace between the bishop and the priest was gauling. To claim he had no idea what was happening is an insult to the victims and the parishioners.
    Were it not for the vigilance of some of the parishioners in the parish where one of the priest’s were moved to there may well have been further victims. His claim that there were no victims in the “new” parishes is galling. And is certainly not due to any of his actions.
    He should resign and should have years ago but his disdain for the people in the diocese means he will remain on as bishop in his delusional state of self importance and self righteousness

    Reply
  • My wife told me this morning that we first met 8 years ago today. I told her it was a friendship that crossed a boundary!

    Reply
  • Kev Mak 16/09/12 #

    Not living in the real world and only apologises after being forced to do so by higher authorities.Therefore his words are hollow.Keeps returning to who do we trust or who can we trust. I personally am fed up with the continued stupid public comments made by men of the cloth.If thats what they say in public Im scared of what they really believe in private.Its that which has affected ,offended and abused the congregation. Yet in droves we fill the churches, submitting to the real demons.

    Reply
  • And he was the President of Garbally College, Ballinasloe.

    Reply
  • @ Mick Collins, I’ve heard from people in the know, that when, not if but when they go looking at the African missions, there will be a civil war within the Vatican, sure how many 60+ Jesuit priests have returned home with a nice 20 something on their arm! sickening!

    Reply
  • One major religion killing ambassadors and calling for people to be beheaded for name calling their favourite prophet who was 52 and had sexual relations with a 9 yr old and the other still pathetically handling the while issue of child sex abuse , I’m so happy to be atheist.

    Reply
  • Im sure he broke SOME irish law in relation to moving the priests,can the guards not go after him….

    Reply
  • He should resign immediately

    Totally out of order on so many fronts

    Reply
  • I ask this question every time this crops up but how can people who continue to practice Catholicism do so when it’s clear every level of the Church is tainted by this scandal? Still believe in God, fine, that’s your own choice, but seriously, going to sit and listen to these people, why oh why?

    Reply
  • Nappy 16/09/12 #

    he should f##k off bit late now he knew what he was saying in his speeh before hand as he wrote it down it wasnt a in the moment saying and while that pr##k is one of the ceo’s or something like that of trocaire people should not Give them money .do these people think that every time they make a hidious mistake or protect rapist and then come out again and again and say Sorry that all is ok .he should Just f##k off Enough is enough

    Reply
  • They sounded equally ignorant in context too Bishop!!!! The complete lack of understanding as to how abuse impacts the lives of children well into adulthood completely astounds and baffles me. It was your responsibility to know it was a crime, report it and understand it, ignorance is not an excuse, it’s a complete cop out and one that is completely and utterly unacceptable.

    Reply
  • the catholic church is finished, self destructed.

    Reply
  • At the time of writing this comment their are 32 red thumbs against the comments made who are these people ? You have serious issues !!!

    Reply
  • Not specifically related to what this guy said, but is it not a bit obvious that the root cause of the child abuse is the fact the priests are not allowed get married? Men need intimacy, and if they are not allowed get it from a partner, some of them will unfortunately look for it elsewhere.

    Reply
    • Sexual abuse of a child has absolutely nothing to do with intimacy or lack of a partner. Like rape it is about control, power and is a sick evil criminal act which can never be excused.

      Reply
    • Nappy 16/09/12 #

      go on escort.com then or a town were no one knows you what a stupid comment

      Reply
    • It doesn’t necessarily follow, John. Anyway, if said frustrated priest wanted to relieve the longings of the flesh, why poke an altar boy? The lesser evil would be to bugger off back to his room with a dirty book and a strong wrist and not be dragging innocents into the pit of his own filth, so to speak.

      Reply

Add New Comment