TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

‘The State has a poor record as a good parent’ – report on child protection published

The report calls for more early intervention and support of families and proposes changes in law which would allow anyone to ask the courts to place an ‘at risk’ child in care.

Children's Minister Frances Fitzgerald
Children's Minister Frances Fitzgerald
Image: Photocall Ireland!

THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR on child protection has suggested a significant amendment to children’s legislation which would allow any person to apply to a court to have a minor, who they believe to be at risk, placed in care.

In his fifth report, Dr Geoffrey Shannon said that identification and detection of risks to children is the basis upon which any effective child system must operate.

There is a fear that the HSE may not always identify children who are not receiving adequate care and protection, “or that even if it does it may not detect a risk to such a child”.

At the moment, the only option open to somebody who is not the guardian of a child is to institute judicial review proceedings or make a complaint to the Children’s Ombudsman.

Thus it is the HSE alone that polices the safety and welfare of children in Ireland. The question must be asked, is this sufficient?

The report recommends:

The Child Care Act 1991 should be amended so as to enable any person to apply to the court seeking an order or direction in respect of a child who is not the subject of proceedings under the Child Care Act 1991 or the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 but who has been brought to the attention of the HSE, where there are reasonable grounds for believing that the child inquestion is not receiving adequate care and protection.

Certain limitations would apply for any such change in law and it would only be used in “exceptional circumstances”, according to Shannon’s recommendation, which was just one of 47 given to the Children’s Minister Frances Fitzgerald.

It would also only apply to children whom the HSE are already aware of but steps have yet to be taken or if it is deemed to have failed in its duty.

Bart Storan, executive director of Campaign for Children, said that making child protection “everyone’s responsibility within society” is a positive move.

“The report is another call for putting children at the centre and building a system around them but the only way of making sure this happens to to provide robust rights,” he told TheJournal.ie this morning.

Although the recommendation has been given prominent coverage, the central tenet and a recurring theme in the report advocates for the use of alternatives to court and better mechanisms so child protection cases can be prevented.

The child law expert’s latest report comes after the Independent Child Death Review Group outlined the devastation that occurs when the child protection system fails. “The reality is that the State has a poor record as a good parent,” Shannon wrote in his report.

He noted that the number of children taken into care had risen significantly in 2011, adding that support for families needs to be improved in some cases. ”It must be ensured that children are not taken into care because help was not provided at an earlier stage.”

As well as considering greater support for parents with intellectual disabilities, other factors such as the current economic climate should also be considered when reviewing the system of support for families.

Shannon’s 47 recommendations attempt to plug some of the gaps in Ireland’s child protection system, calling on the Government to ratify the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child to enable young people to make international complaints and to hold a referendum to include children’s rights in the constitution as soon as possible.

Although the coalition has promised to hold the vote on children’s rights, no date has yet been set. Fitzgerald confirmed yesterday that the referendum will be held during 2012.

“Every day that goes by without a referendum is another day that children aren’t as protected as they should be,” explained Storan. “It is important that the process is right and the wording is right – but it is also important that it happens soon rather than later.”

Tanya Ward, chief executive of the Children’s Rights Alliance, echoed those sentiments. “We have one opportunity to hold a referendum and we need to be convinced that the wording is as strong as it can be to deal with the gaps in child protection law.”

“We have now been talking about this since 2006,” concluded Storan.

Indeed, Shannon was first appointed to examine developments in the area of child law six years ago. His other recommendations to the Government include providing further and appropriate training to all judges involved in making decisions about the interests of children; ensuring the adequate implementation of the Ryan Report recommendations and providing compensation to abuse survivors.

The report also calls for all non-Irish parents of Irish citizen children to be given permission to remain in – or come back to – Ireland and a greater prioritisation of mental health services for under-18s.

Download the full report here>

Almost 2,300 children taken into care during 2011>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (8 Comments)

  • We’re all for children’s rights but we have to make sure that this is really about children’s rights and not about State interference. nnThe State has not proven itself competent in the protection of children, and history tells us to be careful of giving the State too much power. nnSo by all means let’s have the referendum, but let’s also get the balance right.

    Reply
  • Net curtains are twitching already!!

    Reply
  • More reports of neglect or abuse of children will be useless without the services being put in place to support children who are being put into care. There are already many children awaiting foster care and a shortage of suitable carers. Wouldn’t it be better to put money into family support systems which assist parents to care for their own children. It’s not likely to happen anytime soon as the government seems hell bent on targeting the most vulnerable in society with punishing cuts and reduction of services. The across the board cut in child benefit is one example- this loss of income had a much bigger affect on the poor than on those who just use the money for optional extras. The greatest predictor of poor outcomes for children is child poverty. As long as some children are being denied what they need to reach their full potential as adults, this problem is not going to go a way. And, no referendum on children’s rights will change that.

    Reply
    • I am deeply concerned, as several of my friends are, about the Childrens’ referendum in the Autumn. We oppose it totally. Me because there are 6500 Irish children locked up and an average of 43 more every week, this figure is astronomical for a small society like Ireland, so I’m not giving them more powers to lock up more kids. Save the Kids, Vote NO:-)
      I would be concerned about the quality of accommodation the State would make available to more children being placed in the State’s care as is the obvious result of this referendum. I would be concerned that there might be containment facilities in cellular form for children, God forbid.
      I have no personal axe to grind as I am single and have no children, but I don’t trust the State with children and I don’t trust the HSE with anybody, especially not having regard to their mismanagement of psychiatric hospitals and patients which is to be totally condemned. And I feel that children don’t fare any better in State/HSE care than the unfortunate psychiatric patients and the former occupants of the orphanages of I reland.
      So how are they going to be any better this time, we have absolutely no guarantee. This has not been thought out sufficietly, not debated much and not enough care has been taken at all as we are rushed into a referendum that we know nothing about and that could make the final situation even much worse for parents and children alike.
      Festina lente, we must hasten slowly.

      Reply
  • Firstly if any person can apply to put kids in care that’s a total idiotic suggestion. There will be neighbours reporting neighbours in estates just because they don’t get along. Kid in danger call your local guards let them deal with it.

    Also fine I see that the state has to provide good care for kids but they are there in the first place because of awful parenting and nothing happens to the parents they keep their social house and the state also pays to look after their child and in many cases the state pays for that lovely parents alcohol.

    I know this will draw fire but I firmly believe after 3 criminal convictions (serious offences not speeding) that a person should be sterilised

    Reply
    • Not before time, there is a growing awareness that bureaucratic institutions make poor providers of care for societies most vulnerable members.
      This is particularly important issue given the certainty that the state will not be able to continue to fund these ineffective services in light of the continued detioration of it’s finances.
      Who will fill the gap and how will it be filled?
      The institutions best equipped and able to provide effective care to the vulnerable are society in general; local communities and family in particular.
      I welcome this initative as a positive and progressive step.
      Historically, the state as the central actor in the provision of care is a recent and unsuccessful experiment.

      ” It is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. It knows best what we need and what must be done. We must trust in its absolute power, knowledge, and presence in all areas of our lives. For this overseer is the source of justice, truth, wisdom, wrath, and mercy.

      So it appears big government has become…”
      Christine Smith

      Reply
    • siobeli 25/07/12 #

      Completely agree….nothing is being done to parents who neglect their children.

      Reply
  • this referendum is a wolf in sheeps clothing, children will be trafficked out of this country with proposed new changes and they are legislating laws that would have them take any child for any reason .

    Vote no or reap what you sow with a yes vote

    Reply

Add New Comment