TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Cyprus may call extra bank holiday to get time to pass unpopular bailout deal

The president needs to get the legislation ratifying the deal through parliament before banks reopen on Tuesday – or face a run on accounts.

Cyprus Central Bank chief Panicos Demetriades leaves a meeting with the president in Nicosia earlier today
Cyprus Central Bank chief Panicos Demetriades leaves a meeting with the president in Nicosia earlier today
Image: AP Photo/Petros Karadjias

CYPRUS HAS POSTPONED an emergency debate in parliament on a controversial EU bailout today, threatening a prolonged closure of the island’s banks as MPs baulk at an unprecedented tax on savings.

Fellow eurozone countries and international creditors imposed the deeply unpopular levy of up to 9.9 per cent on all deposits in the island’s banks as a condition for a desperately needed €10 billion bailout.

Conservative President Nicos Anastasiades needs to get the legislation ratifying the deal through parliament before banks reopen or face a run on accounts.

But Cyprus media reported that the scale of revolt against the agreement among MPs has thrown into disarray his efforts to do so over a three-day holiday weekend, and he may have to declare an additional bank holiday on Tuesday.

Negotiations are under way with the central bank to keep branches closed for an extra day, despite the potential economic cost, the privately run Sigma TV reported.

Anastasiades is struggling to secure even a simple majority for the terms of the bailout in the 56-member parliament in which his conservative DISY parliament holds just 20 seats, the channel said.

State television said the government had decided to postpone the debate to “ensure MPs were fully aware of the situation and were better informed.”

The president also postponed until Monday a planned address to the nation to defend the “painful” sacrifices which he insisted were the only way to save the island’s banking sector from total collapse.

MPs will now convene at 4:00 pm (2pm GMT) on Monday to debate ratification, the state broadcaster said.

The debt rescue package, agreed in Brussels early on Saturday after some 10 hours of talks, is significantly less than the €17 billion Cyprus had initially sought.

Most of the balance is to be made up through the bank deposit levy – the first eurozone bailout in which private depositors are having to help foot the bill.

Bank customers aren’t happy

Cyprus Financial Crisis

Customers queue to use an ATM outside of a Bank of Cyprus branch on Saturday (AP Photo/Pavlos Vrionides)

Savers in Cyprus banks reacted with shock and anger after Anastasiades agreed to the tax in an 11th-hour U-turn on months of promises that it was a red line he would never cross.

“I feel betrayed,” public sector employee Elpida told AFP. “This decision might bring good results in terms of arithmetics but it will break our trust in the economy.”

Opposition politician George Lillikas called on his supporters to protest on Tuesday, charging that the president, who was elected only last month, had “betrayed the people’s vote.”

The tax will hit everyone with savings in Cyprus banks from pensioners to Russian oligarchs, and even the president of the European parliament Martin Schulz expressed concern about the hit being imposed on small depositors.

“The solution must be socially acceptable,” Schulz warned.

Britain, meanwhile, announced that it will compensate its diplomatic and military personnel for any losses from the levy – but not the tens of thousands of other British expatriates on the island.

Cypriot ministers will meet at 8:30 am on Monday to thrash out the draft legislation to put before parliament, state media said.

Europhile former president George Vassiliou pleaded with MPs to accept an agreement that he said was the only one acceptable to the parliaments of EU creditor nations like Germany.

“The Germans told us they couldn’t pass a Cyprus bailout through the Bundestag without a haircut on bank deposits,” Vassiliou told state television from Berlin.

If this bill isn’t approved, there will be a run on the banks and they will collapse.

But the socialist EDEK party said its five MPs would vote against the “catastrophic” deal and would not be strongarmed into agreeing to it because of the deadline of the banks reopening.

“We refuse to succumb to this dilemma by blackmail,” the party said.

The communist AKEL party, which has 19 seats, refused to sign an agreement on similar terms while it was in power before Anastasiades’s election last month.

And even the president’s coalition partners – centrist DIKO with eight seats – voiced strong reservations.

However German political analyst Hubert Faustmann said that ultimately MPs had little choice.

Parliament will have to vote it through because the alternative is bankruptcy. They cannot amend it, as far as I know, it is a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote — and a ‘no’ means bankruptcy.

- © AFP, 2013

Read: Bank deposits hit as EU/IMG bailout for Cyprus agreed >

Read next:

Comments (60 Comments)

  • I really hope they try to resist this, like this guy..

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21813754

    Reply
  • Wow. Deeply unsettling. Really not sure what to make sure of this at all. At least they haven’t tried to pull this one us. Yet.

    Reply
    • but they are doing exactly the same thing, whats the difference if they take it at source or afterwards?, also by protecting the savings here the way they did, they just made everyone else pay for it, including people that couldnt afford to save in the first place, it is better to let savings go that are sitting there doing nothing than shrinking the economy

      Reply
    • No chance bud, my savings are from taxed income, already contributed like everyone else. Plus they’ve increased DIRT, so they can jog on if they try that shit with savings too.

      Reply
    • ah, you miss my point, why should someone else have to pay more to protect your savings regardless if it was taxed or not? dont get me wrong, im not advocating that they try to snatch the savings, just asking why should other people pay to protect your savings?

      Reply
    • @rp, interesting take on it, but I disagree. Savings are what’s left from taxed earnings. It belongs to the saver. It’s not part of the equation, and shouldn’t be in my opinion

      Reply
    • yes i agree but you still are not addressing the point, why should someone else have to pay to protect your savings? let me try and ask it a different way, what makes your saved money more important than another persons earned money? i know it is more important to you and rightly so, but in a logical and also from an economic viewpoint it makes more sense to let the bank fail and take the deposit with it, than to shrink the economy by taxing and cutting from people that already cant afford to save, these people spend all the money they get every week so its just plain stupid to lower their income in favour of savings that aren’t part of the economy, they didn’t do it because people more be more likely to object in more strenuous ways, but what they are doing isn’t actually any different, its just slightly more ‘acceptable’

      Reply
    • *people would be more likely

      Reply
    • Bank deposits are guaranteed up to €100,000 under EU rules.
      Now the EU itself has shown that those rules are worthless. “Do as I say, not as I do”.

      Please punctuate your comments, they are almost impossible to comprehend.

      Reply
    • letting the ank go and its savings with it is one thing, the State confiscating those savings is something else all together.

      Reply
    • I guess your question is really should savers take another extra hit over non savers?

      Reply
    • Because savings are monies already taxed in the past. We hear so often that previous agreements cannot be reneged on, such as tidy pension arrangements for some. Well when that money was earned the agreed tax was paid and some people decided to put a percentage of the balance aside thinking it was safe. To say now “well actually we need some more of it” off only the ones who saved is disgraceful. Especially when they refuse to apply the same rule to other agreements.
      It is no better than theft and those who say its the only option should consider someone forced to steal to survive, for them theft is their only option yet we lock them up, where is the line any more?

      Reply
    • Barry, the deposits up to €100,000 are only protected by EU rules if the bank goes belly up. They are not protected from the Government putting a taxon them or just plain stealing them from under your nose to appease the Germans.

      Reply
    • Revolt Peasant
      The answer to your question is twofold. Firstly those deposits allow the Banks to lend money for productive purposes within an economy. If there is a flight of deposits from the Banks then economic activity could collapse. Secondly the asking of the question is surprising given the contributions you normally make to these pages so it is assumed you know the answer and wish to just belittle the writer.

      Reply
    • Ben
      What is the difference in the Cypriot scenario with the confiscation of private pension capital that our Government have taken over a four year period?

      Reply
    • They already have, our own government placed a 0.6% Levy on private pension funds. Do you think they will stop there?

      Reply
    • @peter daly thanks for the insult, it isnt true what you said about me, i was asking a genuine question, your assertion that deposits allow banks to lend has nothing to do with the situation i was talking about as the bank would cease to trade when it became non-pofitable, @padraig no i dont think savers should take a double hit, i just dont see why others should pay to protect savings, it helps one section i.e. savers and penalises non savers, what are the savers contributing to protect non-savers monies?

      Reply
    • @Rp the savers are contributing Their income tax, levies, VAT – exactly the same as non savers. With low interest rates & increased DIRT there is little ‘helping’ savers. I don’t think you can interchange “helpful” and “not further impacting” as you have been.

      Reply
    • but so are non-savers paying tax, its like you are deliberately not understanding what i am saying, just answer this simple question, if i had savings and you had none, would it be fair for you to pay for the security of my money given that we both paid the same amount of tax?

      Reply
    • Yes, because I would also be “paying for the security” of my savings, if i chose to save.

      Reply
    • My reply to a German newspaper a few hours ago :
      Es ist dass gleiche geschichte in ganz Europa. Die Banken leihen viel Geld zum niedrigen zinsen ohne verantwortung, ohne kontrol, spielen mit Geld wie in Cassino, manipulieren den Libor index, ohne angst für konsequensen oder strafvervolgung, gehen pleite.In Griecheland haben die Banken sehr viel Geld geliehen ohne kontrole. Die haben in rest Europa viele Waren importiert für dass Geld und die Welt schien in ordnung zu seinbis die grosse erwachung. Aber alles kein problem. Der steuerzahler wird (muss) dafür aufkomen. Wenn meine Firma pleite geht, wer zahlt dafür ? Niemand, und dass ist richtig so. Nehme ein gutes beispiel von Island, Die haben ihre Leute vorgezogen und die Banken pleite gehen lassen.
      Padraic O’Dwyer Designer with Russia
      It is the same history that in whole Europe. The banks lend a lot of money to the low interest without responsibility, without control, play with money like in Casino, manipulate the Libor index, without fear of consequences or criminal charges, go broke. In Greece country the banks have lent a lot of money without control. They have imported in the rest Europe many goods for that money and the world seemed in order till the big awakening. But, no problem. The taxpayer will (has to) foot the bill. If my company goes broke who pays for it? Nobody, and that is right so. Follow a good example of Iceland, They have protected their people and let the banks go broke.

      Reply
    • ‘if you chose to save’ you think it is a choice for everyone then? because i can tell you it isn’t, people that are barely putting food on the table are paying for the security on the savings of better off people who have the choice if they want to save or not, your comment proves to me that you do not understand the issue

      Reply
    • Translation of my comment into english was not so good , but fact remaiins that German banks lent a lot of unsecured money to Greece. And now ?German taxpayers get very, very angry when I explain this to them, because they do not want to hear the truth. Much easier to blame the lazy Greeks

      Reply
    • You said “we both paid the same amount of income tax”; I assumed therefore if we pay the same than we earn the same, so if you can afford to save, so can I… Anyhoo, that’s beside the point. I understand what you are saying, I just disagree with you.

      Reply
    • so just because you have the same wages that means you have the same bills? like i said, you do not understand the issue

      Reply
    • It was your hypothetical question, you stated only one variable, I answered. There is no “fair” in the Real World. Either way, someone takes a hit. You think it’s unfair, I think the alternative is unfair. I think that I work, pay all that is required of me by the state, and all the bills I seem necessary to live life how I choose to, then any money I have left that i wish to save is mine; the policies & mistakes of others may have changed the circumstances we live in, but it doesn’t change my opinion.

      Reply
    • @Revolting peasant, there is where you ALL FAIL….. You think you shouldn’t pay for your neighbours savings, but why should your neighbours hard savings pay for you? What you all miss is the greater picture. Who are we paying, what are we paying and WHO has the right if any to decide that any of you should pay in the first place. None of you no matter what side of the barrier you stand are responsible at least the vast majority of you. Divide and conquer is a mighty tool and we fall for it unknowingly…… Please wake up you lot, instead of deciding who should “rightly” pay, ask yourselves the ultimate question: should ANY of you pay at all… Point blank.

      Reply
    • yes david but you will not get the protected section of society to agree, like this argument has shown

      Reply
    • I don’t see where the argument has “shown”, its only shown how one can turn against the other, each accusing that the other should pay. Really your argument on both sides stinks, you both are on each side of the fence, me I’m looking at you from the sideline knowing that in reality none of you should be liable to pay at all. In order to get the “rich” to pay or more so the bond holders, multinationals and world banks well then stop bickering and cling together and direct your energy in the right direction. Suggestion that’s all…

      Reply
    • you also misunderstand me, i dont think anyone should pay

      Reply
    • So we have discovered!

      Reply
    • Revolting peasant – they do not own this money. Whether or not it is “doing anything for the economy” is, quite frankly, irrelevant. It is grand larceny.

      Reply
  • Ireland gets bailed out, we roll over and our politicians act like lap dogs to the EU elite and the Germans lead to the same measures being imposed on everyone else. Ireland was used as a sounding board to see what the financiers and bureaucrats could get away with.

    Now Cyprus is in the same position. If the EU and Germany can pull this one off then who will be next? Looking for the money for your holidays this year, sorry that’s gone. The money that you have being saving up for a mortgage well most of it is still there minus 6-10% so you will just have to wait another 4-5 years.

    The EU and financial money men could not have pulled this off in any other country other than the smallest ones in the EU. If you tried this in Spain, Greece or Italy it would have undoubtedly have started a war. Hopefully this will blow up in their faces because it’s one thing to take tax out of your pay pack but another to rob money from your account. This action has sent shock waves throughout Europe because if it can happen to Cyprus it can happen to anyone.

    Reply
  • the eurocrats are pushing europe towards anarchy and they cant even see it

    Reply
    • was it a bit stupid of them to announce this on a saturday? if they are robbing practically everyone in the country wouldn’t it have been smarter to not give them 2 days notice?

      Reply
    • It’s not they can’t see it, they see it coming but don’t care simply because they will be protected from police and military in their ivory towers. The mind of a politician is not like the average man on the street who’s just trying to make a living. A lot of politicians at the top lack empathy toward the common man and just care about money and power.

      Reply
    • Looks to me like they are just testing the water if they get away with it there we could be next!!

      Reply
    • Exactly. Bank guarantees at night, promissory note ‘deals’ in the middle of the night. It’s a tried and tested formula and great excuse for a bad decision.

      Reply
    • @revoltingpeasant- As I recall you were happily telling anyone who would listen that Ireland could have somehow bullied the EU into a debt write off. You seemed to believe little old Ireland had some sort of leverage over them that would have them quaking in their boots. Doesn’t seem to be the case for the Cypriots any more than it was for the Greeks. Have you a plan B? Just wondering…..

      Reply
    • what are you on about shaw? greece has had debt write downs and all we have to do to have them ‘quaking in their boots’ is refuse to pay, like iceland did, your argument is in no way relevant to this discussion, more fool me for responding to it

      Reply
  • I have read that russian money laundering in Cyprus banks is one of the reasons being touted by ze Germans for this hit. 26billion euro of Russian money is Cypriot banks; some very unpleasant people will be very p1ssed off if this is true

    Reply
  • Makes a mockery of the EU treaties about guaranteed savings and the free movement of goods and services by this action. Makes people in euro currency countries that if ilegal actions are imposed then be better having your savings in other non euro denominations so Swiss,UK,USA will see an inward rush to open new accounts.

    Reply
    • There are no treaties, there are no laws, there are no acts above unelected world banks their elected political cronies who all fall like a deck of cards in front of the mighty Rothschild’s. Here the blanket guarantee in the depths of the night was illegal, but no bother to the powers to be as long as the people sit on their FAT ass’s. introducing a blanket tax on account overnight no bother, illegal I’m sure but as long as the FAT ass’s keep sitting, hunky dory, no problema!
      It’s ALL ILLEGAL, corrupt politicians are what they are, corrupt, they are wealthy, it doesn’t affect them so no problem, every thing you see happening is corrupt, it’s ALL about money and its all about the banks and the IMF getting hold of your money. They introduce taxes and privatisation in turn for loans and its a clever scheme to get hold of Europe’s natural resources, assets, whom ever controls what the governments of Europe need, controls those governments, they already control the money supply, soon they will control the water supply and charge for it and that’s only the start…..

      Reply
  • It is clear now that it is the intention to run from Europe from the center. It is been dominated from the center in a way, reminiscent of the carving up by the victors after past wars.
    What happened Iceland? Puff of smoke – end of the world – citizens in absolute poverty????

    Reply
  • Keeping your money under the odearest might not seem to be a bad idea after all !

    Reply
  • If I took €10,000 from somebody to relieve my economic circumstances, it would be seen as theft. Yet it’s quite acceptable for Euro financiers to do so! Likewise when all government parties agreed that we would all have numerous jobs, wonderful standard of living, all our dreams would come true etc., if only we said yes to this referendum, & this one & this one blahdeblah!!!

    Reply
  • I’m shocked! I hope the Cypriot people protest and if need be burn their banks down. When is the financial rape of the people going to end? I fear it won’t until there is a revolt.

    Reply
  • Genius 17/03/13 #

    Now they have the little guy boxed off it time to work their way up the food chain, Grab your cash asap.

    Reply
  • It’s punishment for the Cypriot government’s refusal to deal with long-standing concerns that their banks were awash with dirty Russian money. German back benchers told Merkel that they wouldn’t expose German taxpayers to such a huge risk for the sake of Putin’s friends.

    Unfortunately this is also punishing blameless small-time savers, and that should have been addressed.

    Reply
    • Exactly, they could have forgot about the levy of 6.7% on accounts with savings below €100k (which would be the vast majority of ordinary Cypriots) and just gone ahead with the levy of 9.8% on all accounts over €100k, i.e. the oligarchs and tax evaders. But no, instead they decide to hit the little man first. This will not end well and I can see the Cypriot government having to row back on it.

      The whole episode gives truth to the lie that governments are guaranteeing our savings for up to €100k because at the stroke of a pen they can throw that ‘rule’ out the window. There are lots of people who said it couldn’t happen here. Well now Cyprus has set the precedent it most certainly can.

      Reply
  • When I heard about this on the lunchtime news yesterday I heard mention of Cyprus having to sell their assets too..
    There was oil discovered off the coast of Cyprus not so long ago, they had entered into a partnership with Israel to extract it, I wonder will that be taken from them..
    The country is already messed about enough, for the privilege of having the army there pockets all over the Island are no camera zones – and while the Cypriots can only use the water from sunrise to sundown, the army bases are watering their football pitches..

    The Cypriots feel a deep kinship with the Irish, it’s just a pity that they’re now joining us on the dodgy bailout bus..

    Reply
  • Unfortunately they could easily pull this on us here, we are the most docile population on the planet.

    Reply
  • Amazing how the germans are allowed destroy the lives of so many people. They have more influence now than they would have if Hitler had won the war.

    Reply
  • Trouble at mill lads trouble at mill

    Reply
  • For a UK perspective see http://Www.economist.com

    Reply
  • I think the writing is on the wall for Europe another war is on the way just hope this time the bankers and politicians go and kill each other they are the reason Europe is in the state it’s in

    Reply
  • Just as well I haven’t the money to save !! Saving is becoming a thing of the past in Ireland for most normal people. Only the rich can save now.

    Reply

Add New Comment