TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

And the winner of the Egyptian presidential election is…

The result of the presidential election was finally announced this afternoon.

Supporters of Mohammed Morsi in Tahrir Square
Supporters of Mohammed Morsi in Tahrir Square
Image: AP Photo/Bernat Armangue

THE WINNER OF Egypt’s contentious presidential election has been announced as Mohammed Morsi.

In a tight result, Morsi, who ran for the Muslim Brotherhood, won 51.7 per cent of the vote, against Ahmed Shafiq, the last prime minister under Hosni Mubarak, who got 48 per cent.

More than 26 million people voted in the presidential election, a turnout of 51 per cent.

There was huge scenes of celebration in Tahrir Square where thousands of Mosni’s supporters had gathered to listen as the result was delivered.

AFP reports that some schools and shops closed early as people rushed to get home amid fears of unrest after the result.

The election was a polarising one as voters chose between Shafiq, who was seen as an upholder of Mubarak’s regime, and the Muslim Brotherhood, who had popular support but also raised concerns from some Egyptians that the group focuses too much on bringing religion into public life.

The result of the disputed election was delivered after a speech lasting more than one hour delivered by the head of the presidential elections commission and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Farouq Sultan.

In a meandering speech, Sultan accused the media of deliberately misleading people, and blamed unnamed political factions for lying about the election process.

The result was due to be announced on Thursday but was postponed for three days as the election commission investigated around 400 allegations of voting fraud submitted by both campaigns.

It was the first presidential election since former leader Hosni Mubarak, who held power for 30 years, was overthrown in the Arab Spring uprising in February 2011.

Tahrir Square

(Supporters of Mohammed Morsi celebrate in Tahrir Square after the result is announced. Screengrab via Al Jazeera English)

Egypt: Officials delay announcing election winner >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • This is kind of like what Ireland did. We had a revolution to get (partial) independence then voted Fianna Fáil for the next 80 years.

    Reply
    • In fairness to Fine Gael or Cumann Na Gaedhal at the time( my apologies to Irish Speakers for the appalling spelling) as the first party to take over after a revolution Cosgrave cared more about democracy than power and was willing to hand over power when they lost democratic votes in the 26 counties. As did Fianna Fail. It remains to be seen if the MB will do the same. ( I personally would have rejected the Treaty, but within the context the Treaty created CnG played ball)

      I am starting to sound like a Fine Gaeler here, but they also ensured in the early days the Free State Army never gained power and was always subservient to the state.

      Reply
  • Ideally I would like to see Egypt embrace democracy from the bottom up. It is difficult for people who have not had democracy, to distinguish between genuine democratic parties and demagogues. I reckon neither the Muslim Brotherhood or Mubarak lite have strong democratic inclinations.

    It would be better if democracy start with Local elections for a few terms so people could see what operant democratic parties actually consist of. Then move towards regional elections, and eventually national. An interim caretaker government of responsible leaders, constitutionally bound to cede power after a certain period could run the national day to day stuff.

    That being said the region is generally unstable and the west have never implemented purely altruistic policies in the region so I believe it is likely that the Army will take over provide stability with an iron fist, the international community will be happy enough with that arrangement and soon enough those who reject that system will gradually be “islamo-sized” by the international community.

    Reply
  • Bad day for democracy. Expect the Muslim Brotherhood to move Egypt back in time by a few centuries and to curtail freedom of speech. Non Muslims will be persecuted and power will end up in the hands of theocrats like in Iran. Arab Spring? More like an Arab Autumn.

    Reply
    • Bad day for democracy? The country has had its first democratic elections in over 30 years! Just because you don’t think the right person won doesn’t make it a bad day for democracy.

      Reply
    • @ Ian

      You didn’t get the memo. In the imperialist Western conception of democracy it’s only democratic if ‘our man’ wins. Otherwise it’s vewy vewy baaaaaad, especially if a big bad Muuuuslim guy wins.

      @ Dubliners

      Christians were persecuted by the previous secular regime. The real story here is that the president will likely have almost no power. The SCAF (look it up) remain in firm control.

      Reply
    • It may have been the first election in 30 years but genuinely democratic candidates did not get a chance to contest the election. The SCAF are still in charge and will use the Botherhood to suppress dissent and restrict freedom of speech.

      Reply
    • I like Autumn.

      Reply
  • You are a sad individual Mujaahid. I presume Mujaahid is short for Mujahideen, but I think you are wasting your time fighting a holy war in Ireland. Why not enjoy simple things like freedom of speech, free press, access to the Internet, the right to vote in free elections, freedom of religious practice, etc that you have in Ireland but can never have in Islamic countries which are ruled by dictators and faceless unelected clergy.

    Reply
  • Israel and the US have only their own meddling to blame for this.

    Reply
  • Someone’s on the ball with this!

    Bit of a circus really. This sums it up:

    https://twitter.com/ASE/status/216901779944779777

    Reply
  • The Muslim Brotherhood are simple a conservative, neoliberal party, as slavish to international capital and social conservatism as the Republican Party in the US.

    The situation in Egypt today is nothing like that of Iran in 1979.

    Reply
  • Ian McGrath you don’t know what your on about , Egypt is ruined there is no such thing as democracy when it comes to the brotherhood whats happening in Egypt is the same as what happened in Iran 30 years ago hopefully it doesn’t become like Iran

    Reply
  • Finally, Egypt should now make the transition to shariah and abandon the democratic system of belief. That’s Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and now soon to be Syria – once again the lands are being wrested from western backed tyrants and Islam is flourishing. Soon, once unity binds us we can look toward the fulfillment of the Hadith and realize the Prophetic narration where the east and west and what was between were subordinate to Allah.

    Reply
  • Ky Salib 25/06/12 #

    My uncles served for Egypt in the army in the wars with Israel and you are talking stupid nonsense

    Reply
  • Ky Salib 25/06/12 #

    I’m not saying it does

    Reply
  • Ky Salib 25/06/12 #

    Mujaheed ,, all the coptics want is to live in peace we don’t want conflict with anyone but brotherhood want sharia law and they want to charge coptics a tax for being Christian ? I don’t understand why , I wish that Egypt will become a great country and Muslims and Coptics can live in peace with one another

    Reply
    • Mujaahid 25/06/12 #

      But why should coptics be exempt from tax when they receive the benefits of security etc? You’ve got to move beyond the idea of privilege – you don’t have any. Muslims pay zakat, non-Muslims pay jizyah.

      Reply
  • Ky Salib 25/06/12 #

    We pay our taxes and we don’t cause problems I won’t pay a government money just because I am a Christian I have nothing against muslims I want egypt to become a great country with Christians and Muslims living equally among each other

    Reply
    • Mujaahid 25/06/12 #

      As an Egyptian Coptic you are exempt from military service, so you’re willing to see Muslims die to save you but refuse to contribute toward that – how selfish. As for the farce that Copts don’t cause trouble – I’m sure the businesses destroyed by Coptic mobs and the policemen fired upon by Coptic terrorists would disagree.

      Reply

Add New Comment