TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Eighth US State legalises same-sex marriage

Maryland Senate passed the gay and lesbian marriage bill yesterday.

Openly-gay senator Richard Madaleno hugs Maggie McIntosh and Heather Mizeru after the Senate approved a gay marriage bill
Openly-gay senator Richard Madaleno hugs Maggie McIntosh and Heather Mizeru after the Senate approved a gay marriage bill
Image: Patrick Semansky/AP/Press Association Images

MARYLAND HAS BECOME the eighth state in the US to legalise same-sex marriage.

The Senate passed the gay and lesbian marriage bill following a close 25 to 22 vote yesterday. The bill will now be sent to Governor Martin O’Malley for his signature, reports the Baltimore Sun.

Richard Madeleno, an openly gay senator in the Maryland Senate said it was a “remarkable day”. US House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi called it “an extraordinary victory”.

“This issue has taken a lot of energy, as well it should, and I’m very proud of the House of Delegates and also the Senate for resolving this issue on the side of human dignity, and I look forward to signing the bill,” O’Malley said in a brief interview after the Senate vote.

Despite the cheers and celebrations, legislation does not automatically mean implementation of gay nuptials. The law will likely be petitioned to referendum and voters will have their say by the end of the year.

Opponents of the bill will have to collect almost 56,000 signatures before November to put the legislation on the ballot paper.

-Additional reporting by AP

Read: Poll shows strong support for same-sex marriage>

Related: US state becomes the seventh to legalise same-sex marriage>

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • “Despite the cheers and celebrations, legislation does not automatically mean implementation of gay nuptials. The law will likely be petitioned to referendum and voters will have their say by the end of the year.”

    Why do people care? It doesn’t directly affect them so why get in the way of someone else?

    Reply
  • Good on them.

    Reply
  • Well done!

    Reply
  • There should be a seperate planet for bigots like yourself.

    Reply
    • The existence of an institution to regularize the male/female bond fulfills a particular need. Such a need does not come about with same sex relationships. They do not fulfill the criteria for a marriage to take place, it’s not a matter of bigotry to point out the obvious.

      Reply
  • This is wonderful news!

    Reply
  • RDX862 24/02/12 #

    Be interesting to see if this will be able to pass a referendum. Maryland is 30% African American who overwhelming vote Democrat and would normally be expected to back Democratic issues but they are one of the groups where large numbers oppose gay marriage. The Republicans along with the African Americans might be enough to stop it from passing.

    Reply
  • Maryland is a state, that’s news to me, thanks journal!

    As for gay marriage?
    Yeah it’s all good, doesn’t bother or effect me in anyway, why should I care?

    Reply
  • Great news and another victory for equality (coming hot on the heels of the likes of New York and Washington) that reflects the growing momentum towards marriage equality in the US itself and the west more generally…This will not even be an issue in coming years, except for a small core of religious extremists angry and frustrated at their inability to impose their outdated and theocratic views on modern societies.

    Reply
  • Marriage has always been the state recognised institutional bond between male and female, mostly for the raising of children. Making it a bond between people of the same sex creates a new institution, so much so that the previous institution no longer exists. So no matter what these new laws say it is, it is not marriage, for people of the opposite sex and for people of the same sex it becomes merely a civil partnership masquerading as marriage.

    Reply
    • So since the union can’t produce children it is therefore not a marriage? Does that mean that infertile heterosexual couples, women past the menopause, and married couples in general who simply do not have children are married either?

      Reply
    • No, procreation is only part of the male/female bond. Most times it happens, sometimes it doesn’t, but it always ONLY happens between male and female hence the human need for an institution that men and women can enter together for the benefit of those children.

      Reply
  • Am I alone in the world in finding the whole concept of gay marriage just mind-bendingly odd?
    Before the PC brigade hunt me down and browbeat me to death-I fully support civil unions/partnerships. If 2 people love each other and want to be together for life, they are being perfectly reasonable to expect that their rights to inheritance etc be the exact same across the board regardless of their sexuality.
    I promise you. . . . . I GET that bit ok!
    What puzzles me is why anyone would want to label their relationship in such a way as to identify it with a religion that explicitly condemns such relationships.
    That bit has me stumped.

    Reply
    • Not all marriages are religious. Civil marriages don’t have an association with a religion. Most gay people would want to participate in them. Most people nowadays don’t get married for religious reasons. But not all denominations are homophobic. Some churchs/sects/etc are very pro-gay and speak out in support. Also, plenty of gay people are religious and want to get married for religious reasons (granted they aren’t going to go to one of the anti-gay churches that you’re talking about).

      This isn’t a question about religion, it’s about human rights. Marriage offers literally thousands of legal protections that gay people are denied when they are denied the right to marry.

      People may argue that civil partnerships should be enough but no they aren’t. Why should gay people be forced to accept straight peoples hand-me-down of a legal union and told to simply be glad of what they can get? Civil marriage should be available to everyone or no one

      Reply
    • @Stephen, it’s because you can be both gay and religious.

      Reply
  • alzee 24/02/12 #

    Gay marriage is wrong and will never be anything different weather here,America or even the moon…
    So let the hetero-bashing commence.

    Reply
  • Sad day for Maryland
    Will definitely not pass a referendum
    However, as in California and Ireland, the will of the majority in a referendum will mean nothing to the authorities.

    Reply

Add New Comment