TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

€24,000 payment for sexual orientation discrimination at Credit Union

GLEN, the Gay & Lesbian Equality network, has welcomed the news.

THE EQUALITY TRIBUNAL has ordered that a man who was discriminated against because of his sexual orientation and victimised while a Credit Union employee be paid €24,000.

The man said that he had started working for the business in 2008 and went on to detail the events that led him to taking his case to the Equality Tribunal.

Some of his complaint involved comments made by colleagues about why he was employed, comments about his ‘camp’ accent and sex life, and an overheard conversation about his sexual orientation. All of the respondent (a Credit Union)’s witnesses denied there was a homophobic atmosphere in the office and denied making comments about his sexual orientation or hearing any such comments.

The full details of the case are on the Equality Tribunal website.

The Equality Officer, Gary O’Doherty, found that the Credit Union in question discriminated against the complainant on the sexual orientation ground and that he was also victimised. He order the respondent to pay €8,000 in respect of the discrimination and an additional €16,000 in respect of the victimisation.

He noted:

The award I am making with respect to the discrimination is the approximate equivalent of three months salary in that respect and, as it is made to compensate the complainant for the distress caused to him as a result of the discrimination by the respondent, it is not in the nature of pay.
The award I am making with respect to the victimisation is the approximate equivalent of six months salary in that respect and, as it is made to compensate the complainant for the distress caused to him as a result of the victimisation by the respondent, it is not in the nature of pay.

Decision

The decision was welcomed by Davin Roche, Director of Workplace Diversity, at GLEN, Gay and Lesbian Equality Network. He said:

The Equality Tribunal’s decision is a sharp reminder to all employers of their duty to protect staff from discrimination and that this duty also extends to protecting staff who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender from harassment in their workplaces.

Roche noted that there are over 100,000 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in the workforce and that Irish research has found that one quarter of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees surveyed “had experienced verbal harassment on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity at some point in their careers”.

Roche said that: “Clearly, it’s better for employers and employees to ensure that their workplaces are free from harassment of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in the first place.”

He added that employers should ensure that there is an effective harassment policy in place, that it is communicated properly to staff and implemented properly. “Equally, colleagues can play a role by challenging discriminatory comments or banter immediately if they arise in the workplace,” he concluded.

Read: British Airways worker wins landmark religious discrimination case>

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • You have to have an enforceable policy in the workplace that actively promotes equality and discourages discrimination, be it racial, religous, gender or orientation. You should also have a policy that seeks to prevent bullying and/or harrassment on the same grounds.
    Every employee should expect and receive these basic protections and respect at work. If not the employer is failing in their duty and should pay the proce.

    Reply
  • The problem with a lot of CU’s is the people on the Boards. 40 years ago CU’s were “staffed” & controlled by volunteers so no paid staff or employees were involved.

    Today that has all changed. Most if not all CU’s now have full time Manager’s & Staff. These Manager’s & Staff are required to undertake financial training in relation to CU practices.

    However the Boards are not, they are still made up of volunteers, who in some cases have no business, HR or financial experience but are there as they are known to be “Good people”.

    Until the Boards of the Credit Unions understand that they are legally responsible for what happens and obtain training in issues such as business law, HR law & financial law, these kinds of things will continue.

    Reply
  • Why isn’t the credit union named?

    Reply
  • Sexual harrassment has nothing to do with gender or orientation and everything to do with behavior. Just because a person is overtly gay does not give them a Danny Healy-Rae type permit to break the laws of harrassment

    Reply
  • Businesses should not be liable for this. Individuals should. A business can only do so much but at end of the day its down to the employee to respect other work colleagues. Compensation should come out of their pocket not the business unless its the owner thats at fault.

    Reply
    • Were there complaints? Were corrective actions taken?

      Not enough here to determine who (the company or staff) were to blame

      Reply
    • A business can and should fire people who are abusive to other staff.

      Companies won’t pay attention to complaints unless it’s going to hit them financially. I’m sure if the employee had this resolved the first time he made a complaint, he wouldn’t have taken it this far.

      Reply
    • From reading the decision, a business can put up some kind of defence if they have a robust and effective policy on dealing with harassment. It appears in this case, the business owners didn’t have any policy.

      What’s more, the Equality Officer says he believes that one of the boards members did make derogatory remarks about the person’s sexual orientation.

      In this case, it would seem that making the business liable would be an appropriate action, as they did little to stop any harassment or discrimination, and one of the board members even partook in it.

      Reply
    • Aoife Barry 22/01/13 #

      Hi Zachary – the decision and details are extremely long, and I have included a link to them in the text above. If you give that a read it you should be able to find an answer to your questions.
      Thanks
      Aoife

      Reply
    • Thats an easy thing to say, but the management of a company is responsible for the culture within the company. In a company where a discrimination complaint against you leaves you with a HR/Management meeting and a strike on the record, that sort of thing happens a lot less as where the management turns a blind eye.

      Reply
    • If you review the case on the Equality Tribunal’s website (particularly after paragraph 3.19.) it seems that the man in question made several complaints and that these were not taken seriously by this employer, in fact it seems as if they were actively obstructing him, I don’t know much about the law but it would appear to me that the employer failed to take appropriate action to address his grievance, which i would assume makes them culpable.

      Reply
    • If the business is run properly the management should when they are made aware of a developing situation of bullying and harassment deal appropriately with the perpetrator up to and not ruling out dismissal .

      Reply
    • Do you think evert individual has 24k in their pocket?

      Reply
  • We need more of this to curb homophobic attitudes…employers losing money focuses their attention very quickly on bullying employees!

    Reply
  • Got things arseways rob? An unfortunate turn of phrase .

    Reply
  • I think in this day and age anyone discriminating against someone should be personally liable not the company,what people do is their business
    I work with a guy who is “camp gay”(is that right term?)we have the odd laugh about sexuality everyone knows where to draw the line, he would have no problem saying if he was being abused and knows if anyone were to give him trouble that person would be left outside the circle and refuse to work untill the person was gone

    Reply
  • I bet Rob is heterosexual.

    Reply
  • Gus give a us a kisd

    Reply

Add New Comment