TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 4 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Croke Park Deal has saved almost €600m in first year – review

The results of the first review into the public service pay deal show the public pay bill alone has been reduced by €239m.

Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

THE FINDINGS OF the first major review into the operations of the Croke Park Pay Deal has been published today by the Public Expenditure minister Brendan Howlin.

The review of the agreement’s operations, covering a 12-month period to the end of March 2011, has outlined savings of a total of €597m –  with the public pay bill reduced by €239m in the deal’s first year.

These savings had been introduced by cutting 5,349 people from the public payroll – cutting the public workforce “more quickly than previously estimated” – while “services have been maintained, and in some cases expanded”.

Other costs had been cut by reducing permitted overtime and by and rationalising other work practices.

An independent external auditor, MKO Partners Ltd, was asked to verify the savings made in three sample projects, and found that all three “demonstrated a capacity to facilitate verifiable savings”.

Howlin expressed his satisfaction with the progress outlined in the report, but sounded a note of caution.

“The reality is that further significant cuts in expenditure, coupled with further substantial reductions in the numbers employed in the public service, are unavoidable,” he said.

A spokesperson for the public service union IMPACT said the agreement had gotten off to a “very strong start, despite criticism from some commentators and economists in the wake of the State’s requirement to borrow from the IMF/EU/ECB”.

ICTU general secretary Shay Cody said the agreement was achieving “what it sent out to do – namely to reduce the cost of delivering public services, while at the same time maintaining and in some cases improving those services.”

The findings are published on the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform’s website.

Croke Park targets for local government staffing ‘already met’ >

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • MK 15/06/11 #

    Does anybody have an informed opinion that does not involve reiterating biased media muck? The public service workers are like any others – the majority are hard working but a tiny minority give the service a bad name. Fair enough- PS jobs ara as permanent as can be- but in taking up such a position you sign up to never being rich but probably never relying on social welfare either. In the good times people did not even apply for ps jobs cause they were considered to be poorly rewarded!
    Job cuts in local authorities since 2008 is almost 14% – almost 3 times that proposed in uk. OECD report in ps said that Irish ps numbers were low ( I think 2nd lowest in eu) and that ps gave Ireland a competitive advantage. You can believe OECD or the Irish media who are trying to sell papers based on muck now that their construction related revenue has gone!!!!

    Reply
  • I wonder how much redundancies and early retirements have cost.

    Reply
  • Oooo welcome to the real world Ireland. Imagine what we would have saved if they had cut out ALL the bullshit in that agreement. Austerity my (jack)ass.

    Reply
  • 5000 public jobs lost and the world still turns. Welcome to the private sector where 5000 jobs is a drop in the ocean, with no payoffs or early retirement.

    Reply
  • All these savings and over 5000 jobs gone. Yet I don’t notice any change the quailty of service. Just goes to show that the Unions had the previous government bend over…. Why couldn’t this be done years ago when everyone knew things where out of hand…..

    Reply
  • WOW!
    We have now saved enough money to pay most of the pensions of the fat cats!

    Reply
  • we’re told there was a cut of €289m in pay when, in actual fact, accounting for pensions and increments there was an increase of €106m. There was “less of an increase than there would have been. http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2011/05/18/00064.asp

    Reply

Add New Comment