TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Head of ‘Legion of Christ’ admits knowing about priest’s child seven years ago

The ongoing furore at the Legion of Christ orthodox order threatens to hurt the legacy of John Paul II, who championed its founder.

The headquarters of the beleaguered Legion of Christ order in Rome.
The headquarters of the beleaguered Legion of Christ order in Rome.
Image: Alessandra Tarantino/AP

THE HEAD of the embattled ‘Legion of Christ’ religious order has admitted to covering up news that his most prominent priest had fathered a child, and announced a review of all past allegations of sexual abuse against Legion priests amid a growing scandal at the order.

Fr Alvaro Corcuera wrote a letter to all Legion members in which he admitted he had heard – before he became superior in 2005 – that Rev Thomas Williams, a well-known American television personality, author and moral theologian, had a child.

He said he took Williams’ word that the rumours were false.

Corcuera said that after becoming superior in 2005, he confirmed Williams’ paternity yet did nothing to prevent him from teaching morality to seminarians or preaching about ethics on television, in his many speaking engagements or his 14 books.

Williams, for example, was the keynote speaker at a Legion-affiliated women’s conference just last month in the US and was scheduled to speak at another one in October.

Williams admitted last week he had fathered the child after The Associated Press confronted the Legion with the allegation. In a new statement this morning, Williams said he had resisted his superiors’ encouragement to keep a low profile after the allegations were known to them.

“I foolishly thought that I had left this sin in my past, and that I could make up for some of the wrong I had done by doing the greatest good possible with the gifts God has given me. This was an error in judgment, and yet another thing I must ask your forgiveness for,” he wrote, according to the text obtained by the AP.

Williams has not identified the mother or said whether he was supporting the child or involved in the child’s life. The Legion has said the child is being cared for.

Revelations of Williams’ child and subsequent cover-up have further eroded the Legion’s credibility and compounded the scandal at the order, which in 2009 admitted that its late founder, Fr Marcial Maciel, had sexually abused his seminarians and fathered three children with two women.

For years, the Legion had denied the abuse allegations and publicly discredited the seminarians who went public with their accusations in 1997. Maciel, who founded the Legion in 1941 in Mexico, died in 2008.

The scandal is particularly grave given that Maciel was held up as a model for the faithful by Pope John Paul II, who was impressed by the orthodox order’s ability to attract money and young men to the priesthood.

Maciel’s double life, and the continuing problems of the cult-like order, have cast a shadow over John Paul’s legacy since the Vatican knew of Maciel’s crimes as early as the mid-1950s, yet he continued to enjoy the highest Vatican praise and access until he was finally sanctioned by Rome in 2006.

In 2010, the Vatican took over the Legion after determining that the order itself had been contaminated by Maciel’s influence and needed to be “purified” through a process of reform that is under way.

- Nicole Winfield

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • Him having a child is not a sin, the sin is that priests are still denied proper relationships cos of some laws written by a man 1000 years ago.

    Reply
    • Yeah it’s hard to tell if they are talking about actual abuse or just priests having sex. It seems they view the latter as the more serious though. That a seriously warped position to take.

      Reply
    • Having a child is not a sin, but concealing the fact and standing on a pulpit every Sunday decrying the sins of others is.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 22/05/12 #

      John B Keane wrote about what it must be like for a women to be condemned in the Confessional, for something natural, while the smell of drink reeked in the box from the Priest’s side.

      There are no shortage of fine and admirable priests but there is a very deep rot in the Church, a fatal and evil rot permeates it.

      More Church = Less Christ.

      Reply
  • And the hits just keep on comings….
    I have never known an organisation to hold such depts of hypocrisy. They are a religion founded by men and continued to be lead by the fallible nature of man. They are just deluded into thinking otherwise.

    Reply
  • It’s utterly unbelievable that the Catholic Church continues to treat its adherents with such disrespect. If there are any honest men and women left in the church, they really ought to form their own church based on the teachings of Christ and not some bastardised hypocrisy.

    As Gandhi said “Christians, I like your Christ, you are so unlike him”.

    Reply
  • At least the person that this priest had sex with was an adult……

    Reply
  • “The Legion has said the child is being cared for.” What does this mean – they’re throwing money at him? Great. What about the fact that the kid has been raised hiding a secret and that his Dad was absent. If you want the real sin – here it is. This priest has not taken real responsibility for his actions. He has a son, act like a Dad. Stop hiding behind the BS that you felt like you were making up for it by doing good. That is a rationalization and a cop out. – Go take care of your child and be a dad. Not a Father but a Dad – the greatest title that I have ever been given.

    Reply
  • Legion of loonies

    Reply
  • Cover-ups do not seem to have much security these days and in the USA the faithful have used the separation of Church and State enshrined in the Constitution to bring those responsible before a Grand Jury.This has been a success in Boston and Philadelphia but only partially in Kansas City where Bishop Flynn seems to have been given a reprieve after the faithful had launched a facebook campaign to have him removed.

    Reply
  • Just had a comment removed. Well anyway, I’ll try it this way.
    The impression I receive from the photograph accompanying this article is that of a high security compound accommodating some obscure cult which, on the basis of the accompanying story, engages in sexually abusive practices.
    From this I was reminded of the compound of Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco Texas which was suspected of similar activities and was stormed by state authorities in 1993 resulting in a lengthy siege and the death of over 100 people.
    I hope I’ve upset no one with this observation.

    Reply
  • He left sin in his past.
    I mean I can imagine leaving your son and call him “Sue”…. as the song goes. But to call him Sin

    Reply
  • AlMar 22/05/12 #

    The Legion of Christ scandal is truly grotesque. It is one of the very worst scandals to hit to global Church in the modern era. It is an embarrassment to the Church and indeed to decent Legion of Christ priests, some of whom work with the poorest of the poor in South America.
    But this scandal actually sheds an important light on Pope Benedict. The founder of this order – Fr Maciel – was extremely influential within the Church. However, as Pope John Paul lay dying in 2005, Cardinal Ratzinger began an investigation into the serious allegations against Maciel. He faced a lot of opposition from other powerful cardinals, but he persevered. In 2006, when the investigation was complete, he effectively removed the then-86 year old Fr Maciel from public life and ordered him to a life of penance. This was the right thing to do, but for many in the Church it was a startling development. Since Fr Maciel’s death, he has conducted an investigation of the order, and some of the sordid details of the founder’s life have been laid bare for all to see. There has been no attempt to downplay the real evil at work here.
    The clear historical record shows that Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict has (at least since 2001 when he assumed control of these cases) moved with determination to remove offending priests from the priesthood. He has done so regardless of how powerful or well connected they are. Just last week he disciplined two bishops for various crimes – he sacked one and he dismissed the other from the clerical state altogether. The corruption and incompetence within the Church in Ireland has been so alarming that we often lose sight of the real reforms that have taken place at the global level.
    Yes, undoubtedly there will be examples of where he didn’t get it right or where the system didn’t work. Most of them will rest with the local bishops who haven’t done their job properly (that is certainly the case in Ireland, where the problems are definitely home grown).

    Reply
    • AlMar
      The Roman Church has been beset by scandal almost from it’s very inception, some of it indeed truly grotesque. I mean, apart from clerical paedophilia there’s Nazi ‘rat lines’, the Banco Ambrosia affair… The list could go on and on.
      Even if one does accept the bona fides of the present head of the church in addressing these issues, could one assume that his efforts alone would enable the church to root out the miscreants that are daily being exposed in a world far less deferential to the authority once regarded as absolute in a less enlightened age. One would be somewhat more assured if the efforts to remove these offenders was done on the basis of a more enlightened approach rather than in a reactionary manner to events as they unfold in the media which the impression of an unseemly rush just to save face.
      Good intentions can only be confirmed by appropriate action, not just any action.

      Reply
  • AlMar 22/05/12 #

    Yes, John, scandal was there from the beginning, even amongst the very first apostles. It will also be there right to the very end. No Catholic is surprised by this. The Church is, after all, a hospital for sinners, not a hotel for saints. We all fall short of the mark every single day, the pope included. There is no secret in this.
    By the very nature of things, most reforms arise as a reaction to pressure. It is hard to reform a scandalous situation if it remains hidden and if one doesn’t know about it! Sometimes it is that very pressure that creates awareness of the problems in the first place. In this sense, despite some obvious failures, the media has played an important role in ensuring that leaders in the Church are held to account.
    But not every action on the part of the Church has been purely reactive. There was no real pressure on Cardinal Ratzinger to move against Maciel, or against Gino Burresi, another very high profile Italian priest who was also removed from ministry around the same time for similar crimes. There was absolutely no pressure on Pope Benedict to suppress a 500 year old monastery in Rome last year. This was no small matter – it was the monastery at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme which holds the relics of the crucifixion.
    So, yes, perhaps as is very natural, reforms are a reaction to public scandal, but it is not always the case. Also, remember that Pope Benedict has said that the greatest problems and persecutions in the Church do not come from the outside, but rather are born from the sins within the Church.

    Reply
    • AlMar 22/05/12 #

      The comment above was meant to be a reply to John Murphy’s comment a little bit further up. Must have hit the wrong button…

      Reply
    • Thanks AlMar, I caught up with your reply which is very fair and without much for me to disagree with.

      I think it is useful for the Roman Church to be aware of it’s failings and weaknesses and with the right approach some ground will be made in resolving these issues among it’s members and followers.

      Given it’s acceptance of it’s own human failings another pretty useful measure would be for it to be less forthright in campaigning for state control over non followers who might not wish to be obliged by statute to follow Roman Church teachings in matters of gender and fertility rights etc.

      Reply
    • almar….You are a serious idiot. Angels and heads of pins spring to mind.

      Reply
    • AlMar 23/05/12 #

      @John, thank you for your reasoned and balanced reply. It is a nice change to debate people of the opposite view who are capable of reasonable concessions and of finding the (often significant) common ground that exists. For too many on both sides, debates on this issue are really stuck at the level of character assassination.

      @William, you consider the basic facts I have presented to be medieval scholastic irrelevancies???

      Reply
    • AlMar
      I do think that while (deleted comments aside!) one can hold strong views on either side of opinions and subsequent debate it is important to have a little respect. Particularly in matters of religion where it may not be just solely a matter of opinion but also of belief and spiritual engagement in which a persons feelings can be deeply hurt.
      As I have said some times during debates like this, most religious people that I know are very decent, honest and well-meaning and are presented with enormous difficulties dealing with – well, as I see it – betrayal by church authorities. I also try to be mindful of the fact that I, not being spiritual or religious, can easily misunderstand the personality of religious people to which my arguments for a more secular approach are often directed.
      Other than that I let ‘em have it full whack!

      Reply

Add New Comment