TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Iran: Uranium enrichment to be speeded up

Iran is to step up its uranium enrichment programme by sharply increasing the number of centrifuges used to make nuclear fuel.

Image: Ronald Zak/AP/Press Association Images

IRAN WILL STEP up its uranium enrichment programme by sharply increasing the number of centrifuges used to make nuclear fuel, a senior official said Wednesday, in direct defiance of Western demands.

The statement by Iran’s nuclear chief, Fereidoun Abbasi, is likely to escalate tensions. The West suspects Iran’s nuclear programme could be headed toward weapons production and has imposed punishing sanctions to try to persuade Tehran to stop enrichment.

Iran has denied the charges, saying its programme is peaceful and geared toward generating electricity and producing radioisotopes to treat cancer patients.

Uranium enriched to a low level is used to produce nuclear fuel for reactors, but high level enrichment would make it suitable for use in atomic warheads.

Abbasi said Iran is making nuclear advances in the face of the severe economic measures imposed by the UN and the West.

“Despite sanctions, we will most likely see a substantial increase in the number of centrifuge machines this year. We will continue enrichment with intensity,” Abbasi was quoted by state TV as saying Wednesday. The Iranian calendar year ends on March 20.

Abbasi did not say if Iran’s stepped up work would be at the five percent fuel level or the higher 20 percent quality, which has worried the West because it can be purified to weapons grade more quickly. There have been indications that Iran may push its enrichment even higher than the 20 percent acknowledged to UN nuclear watchdogs.

His remarks came days after the UN agency said Iran is about to double its output of higher enriched uranium at its fortified Fordo underground facility. That could move Iran closer to weapons capability.

International Atomic Energy Agency

A Nov. 8 report by the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran has installed about 2,800 centrifuges at Fordo and is poised to double the number of operating centrifuges, from the current 700 to nearly 1,400.

Iran says it needs 20 percent enriched uranium to make fuel for a medical research reactor in Tehran that produces isotopes for about 1 million patients annually.

Abbasi also said Iran will soon conduct a test run of its heavy water reactor in Arak in central Iran, despite demands from the UN to stop the work. The test will use virtual fuel, not actual radioactive material, he said.

He said construction of the 40-megawatt research reactor is progressing on schedule, but he noted that experts are handling the project with greater care in anticipation of possible sabotage attempts.

“The Arak reactor is progressing without any problem according to the schedule. Only because of security considerations, we are moving with caution, since enemy intends to harm this reactor,” he was quoted by state TV as saying. “All the equipment needed to operate this reactor has been purchased.”

The West is concerned that the heavy water reactor could produce enough plutonium for a nuclear weapon each year, if the spent fuel is reprocessed. That would be another pathway for bomb-grade material, but Iran is not known to possess a plutonium reprocessing facility

Iran has experienced explosions and malfunctions at its nuclear and industrial sites, partly due to faulty equipment secretly procured on the global market.

Also, Iran says it is the target of a campaign that has included the abduction and assassination of scientists, the sale of faulty equipment and the planting of a destructive computer worm known as Stuxnet, which briefly brought Iran’s uranium enrichment activity to a halt in 2010.

Read: US denies agreement to meet Iran, but says it is prepared to do so

Read next:

Comments (62 Comments)

  • This will give the Israelis the excuse to use a pre emptive strike on Iran. This is when all hell will break loose in the region.

    Reply
  • a great boost

    Reply
  • I don’t know enough about this to make an informed comment but from what I do read, as soon as they reach high level enrichment Israel will attack?.

    All hell is going to break loose soon enough, it appears.

    Reply
  • Well they do have to hurry, if they are to be ready for the imminent coming of the 12 Iman. where all the land must be laid waste first.

    Reply
  • Why don’t they find the Iraqi wmd’s before attacking Iran………… Oh wait…….

    Anyone else sick of this bs? If they were really worried about nuclear armed “bad guys” they would deal with N. Korea…..Who ARE nuclear armed, at war with the South and has a lunatic for a leader

    Reply
    • Not forgetting North Korea actually made threats against the US.
      attack on Iran is politically motivated by the Zionist regime in israel.
      Israel needs to take a step back and think of what results attacking Iran will achieve.
      Not what the region needs at the moment.
      Take it from the Arab prospective or the Persians in irans case.
      Israel has WMD(which it denies.but it’s well known it has them).
      Is constantly threatening its neighbours .

      Reply
  • We’re viewing the news refracted by western media. So, it’s ok for the US, UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel to have them but not Iran.

    What’s the fear? Oh right, Iran could invade another country. Really?

    Statistically how many countries has Iran ever invaded? Zero.

    Ok, and how many has say the USA invaded? Lets put it this way, Turkey thinks they should be in the Guinness Book of Records for ‘Most Foreign Interventions’.

    http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html

    Reply
    • Wonderfully put. The media pits a spin in any direction it wants. Remember all the evil Saddam Hussein did, non stop articles and his weapons program…. Then nothing and he was executed for gassing the kurds in the 80′s……something Winston Churchill did in the 20′s……..

      The media wants a evil villain in the middle east. There is no face to Hamas, so they pick on Iran guy (not going to try his name).

      And yes, he supplies weapons to Hamas and dozens of innocents have died by them. But…..

      The us supplies weapons to Israel and thousands of innocents have died by them……. But we get western news and views……

      Reply
    • Life must be so interesting in the mind of a conspiracy theorist

      Reply
  • The hypocrisy makes my blood boil when I hear the Americans and the Israelis banging on about Iran’s nuclear capabilities when they have the worlds biggest nuclear arsenal.

    Reply
  • Seriously I have good intentions for the US but as I have said on here before they need to step back from helping Isreal and not allow a war just because they don’t like Iran.

    Reply
  • It’s their country,they can do what they want as long as they don’t threaten anyone else,as for the U.S.A ???????

    Reply
    • So by your logic genocide would be acceptable as long as it doesn’t effect anyone else and hitler keeping concentrations camps as long as he didn’t invade other countries would be acceptable as long as it didn’t effect anyone e

      Reply
  • To quote Zoolander ‘I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.’ I knew The Journal tended to have a slight anti-American bias but I’m gobsmacked to come on here and find that the reaction to nuclear weapons being obtained by a theocracy where gays are executed, women are murdered in ‘honour-killings’ in their droves and whose leader denies the holocaust, is to blame it all on an American plot. You constantly berate Catholicism for its backwards ways and yet your love-in with radical ultra-conservative Islam knows no bounds. I despair.

    Reply
  • The Iranian Nuclear Programme was started with help from the USA in 1957. During the Shah’s time, the US planned to build many nuclear reactors although this never got off the ground as he was overthrown in 1979. Amazing that the US and Israel (nuclear-armed, yet they never signed the NPT) could lead the charge to war on such spurious and hypocritical grounds. Also Iran could do with nuclear power as it is not an oil-refining country, it produces and exports its crude oil and needs to import refined petroleum products.

    Reply
    • Why doesn’t it build refineries then?

      Reply
    • @William – They have been increasing the refining capacity since 2007. The Americans wanted them to have nuclear power back when they only had a population of 23 million, now they have 70 million. It makes total economic sense to have cheap nuclear fuel for domestic use and be an oil exporter. There’s no real argument against them exercising their right to nuclear power.

      Reply
    • The whole reason why Iran is pursuing nuclear power is because they know their oil supplies will run out eventually. They have few other ways of generating the power they need. Nuclear is really the only option they have for an indigenous energy network once the oil runs out.

      Israel just hears the words Iran and nuclear and instantly thinks Armageddon is coming.

      Reply
    • Jason & Malcolm, you are both living in cloud Cuckoo land. No one has a problem with Iran using Nuclear Power. The West & Russia has actually offered to supply the fuel. The Iranians refused and insist on enriching their own Uranium, which they can then make bombs from. It’s enriching the west is opposed to.

      Have either of you considered what would happen in the Middle East if a nuclear test went off in Iran that showed they had a Nuclear Weapon?

      Reply
  • You mean “…sped up…” in the title?

    As for Iran…don’t take the rattle out of their hand just yet…they are bound to mess up and poison themselves at some stage!!

    Reply
  • They have enough oil to power the country for hundreds of years . Does not make sense for them to build for power generation.

    Reply
  • Mjhint 28/11/12 #

    Time to deal with this theocracy before its too late.

    Reply
    • U watch fox news much?

      Reply
    • Derek, you mean it’s not a theocracy or we shouldn’t deal with them? Let them make nuclear weapons then? It’s not going to happen. They will be attacked if they get close to building nuclear weapons.

      The idea that they want the Uranium to make anti-cancer treatment is a sick comment considering they hang gay people and shoot their own children for demonstrating.

      Reply
    • Mjhint 28/11/12 #

      I do derek normally for a laugh. However I would like to hear what you think should be done when Iran acquires an apocolyptic weapon & detonates in a western city. Do you think we should send in the US marines then.

      Reply
    • Who’s we?

      Reply
    • North Korea, one of the so-called “Axis of Evil” already has operational nuclear weapons yet Armageddon hasn’t been unleashed. Funny that isn’t it? For years the media was full of stories about how dangerous North Korea would be once they develop nuclear weapons and that war would surely follow. Now they have nuclear arms and last I checked the Korean Peninsula is still there.

      Nuclear weapons are nothing more than a deterrent. No nation would sanely develop nuclear weapons an openly use them against a civilian population…oh wait. The US did.

      Reply
    • Jason the world has enough nuclear weapons, when the US used nukes, the world was a very different place. A country that continually calls for the annihilation of Israel should never have nuclear weapon. Iran is against the west and everything it stands for. Too many bloody do gooders

      Reply
    • Jason, they are not “do gooders”. They are opposed to the Israeli democracy, are left wing/quasi communists, with a hidden anti-Semitism agenda. There’s no logic whatsoever in a western democrat supporting the fascist, terrorist supporting, murderous regime in Iran. Even their own people don’t support them.

      Reply
    • Jason, your analogy to North Korea is ridiculous. North Korea hasn’t used their nuclear weapons yet!

      Now that they have them, and they were developed during the cold war, a different time, it is next to impossible to do anything about them.

      When the US used them it was against another brutal, mass murdering fascist regime. It was use them and kill 200,000 people or invade Japan and lose 500,000 US solders AND kill 1,000,000 Japanese. The Japanese started that war, the US had to end it as quickly as possible. Isn’t it odd that you never hear the Japanese today call the dropping of the bombs a war crime or an atrocity, just western lefties who were not sitting in US ships waiting to invade Japan and be killed.

      Reply
  • Typical AP cut an paste propaganda. The journal has well and truely shown its colours between this and the Gaza attacks

    Reply
  • It’s disturbing to see how many commenters seem to trust Iran but yet detest Israel and the US.

    Reply
    • Thats cause we live in the age of information, we ain’t stupid anymore. We know exactly whats going on cause its happening in our own country. And its not about the US or Israel, its about the people that lobby the f**k out of them countries to get what they want. And its the same in Europe. People banging on about 3rd World countries and dictators and shit without realising that democracy is a farce in the 1st world too. Please stop the charade, its getting boring now.

      Reply
    • uranium enrichment to be speeded up lol WHY? why do you need it? why mess about with such dangerous crap? that it may blow up in their face! more money, more oil, more power, more power, more nuclear energy. go to hell!

      Reply
    • Derek if the west is so bad and democracy fails. Why do so many immigrants go to America/Europe for a better life. Why is there so many asylum seekers seeking sanctuary in the west. We are constantly slamming ourselves and blaming America for the worlds ills. I assure you, travel the world open your eyes and I promise you, you will cherish the safety and stability of any western country.

      Reply
    • Cholly. Does Capitalism have to be explained to u 2. There ain’t no 1st world without a 3rd world, cause there ain’t no rich without poor.

      Reply
  • Iran will be attacked eventually.Read ‘The Grand Chessboard’ by Zbigeniew Brzezinski. (Senior advisor to Obama and previous administrations gone) He wrote this in the 90′s. The jist is the occupation of the middle east was always on the cards to gain control of Eurasia. As he says, “who controls eurasia-controls the world” , all in aid in keeping United States as the great superpower.
    If the US and the rest of the western world were pro human rights they would have interviened in Zimbabwee years ago and ousted Robert Mugabe.. Guess there isnt any oil there is there.

    Reply
  • Shocking the number of people on here who believe that Iran’s nuclear programme is solely based on the pursuit of nuclear energy.
    The IAEA have consistently said for the last few years that it has credible evidence from multiple sources that Iran has engaged in a wide range of activities which are incompatible with a peaceful nuclear programme.
    Whether or not Iran should have nuclear weapons is a different question, but don’t be fooled into thinking this is a domestic power programme.
    http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iaeairan/iaea_reports.shtml

    Reply
    • And they already have enrichment to a level required for nuclear energy so any higher now is for weapon purposes

      Reply
    • mattoid 29/11/12 #

      Red thumb away peeps, but please open your eyes and minds and don’t kid yourself – this is NOT about the pursuit of domestic nuclear power.
      As I said, its a different argument whether or not Iran should have nuclear weaponry, but make no mistake, that’s what they’re aiming for!

      Reply

Add New Comment