TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

‘We knew nothing of the firestorm of allegations to come’ – Savile family statement

Read the family’s statement in full.

Image: Peter Jordan/PA Wire/Press Association Images

AS THE CATHOLIC Church looks to strip Jimmy Savile of his papal knighthood and the first anniversary of the late TV presenter’s death approaches, his family have issued a statement addressing the recent “firestorm” of allegations against him.

Savile’s nephew Roger Foster said:

A year ago our uncle, Sir Jimmy Savile, passed away.

It was a shock when it happened as I had only seen him the week before and although seeming under the weather, I had no concerns over his wellbeing. A week later he was dead and my cousin and I were left with the task of organising his funeral.

We were proud of him. Proud of his achievements and the help he had been able to give to others.

We knew nothing of the firestorm of allegations to come. We set out to organise the funeral knowing that he was well respected by many, many thousands of people.

We knew that the funeral was going to grow because so many people wanted to be a part of the celebration of his life.

We felt so honoured that so many wanted to remember him and mark his passing.

As time passed, the grieving process enabled us to come to terms with his death. By the time summer arrived we were getting ready for the auction of his possessions so that, as he requested in his will, the money could go to his charities. It was a great success.

We became aware of the programme that was being made with allegations of a darker side to him that we knew nothing about.

I watched the programme in horror and could not believe that these allegations were about our uncle. This wasn’t the man we knew and loved.

Like everyone else we asked the question, Why now? We couldn’t find an answer.

The allegations kept coming and were beginning to overwhelm us. Media were chasing us asking for interviews as family members.

The allegations are very serious and we began to have doubts as to our own feeling towards our uncle.

How could the person we thought we knew and loved do such a thing?

Why would a man who raised so much money for charity, who gave so much of his own time and energy for others risk it all doing indecent criminal acts? How could anyone live their life doing the ‘most good and most evil’ at the same time?

We became more aware of the outrage that many members of the public were feeling.

We began to think that his headstone, which we had only unveiled a couple of weeks earlier could become a target for people wishing to show there emotions.

The dignity of the cemetery, the people who are buried there and the relatives who tend the graves had to be respected.

We took the decision to remove and destroy the headstone so that it couldn’t become a focus for malicious people.

The decision was a difficult one to make but we knew it was the right one.

A vilification of his name, his achievements and everything he stood for followed. People are moving as quickly as possible to disassociate themselves from him.

His charities, which he was so proud of, debated the prospect of removing his name from their title.

The trustees have since decided that this wasn’t enough and that the charities will have to be wound up and the monies given to other charities working in a similar field.

Records of all his efforts and the good work he had done, have been, or are in the process of being removed.

We recognise that even our own despair and sadness does not compare to that felt by the victims.

Our thoughts and our prayers are with those who have suffered from every kind of abuse over so many years and we offer our deepest sympathy in what must have been a terrible time for all of them.

We can understand their reluctance to say anything earlier and can appreciate the courage it has taken to speak out now.

Our hearts go out to them and we offer them our sympathy and understanding in their anguish.

Where will it all end? Who knows? The repercussions of this scandal are enormous.

We, as his closest family, have to endure further revelations on a daily basis.

Our feelings are in turmoil as we await the next turn of events.

Savile investigation: Allegations against ‘eight to ten’ BBC employees

Read next:

Comments (43 Comments)

  • It’s very difficult for the family as they have done no wrong. But the victims needs must come first and their stories must be heard.

    Reply
    • Ah the poor fella, nothing has been proven, he was a fantastic man…

      Reply
    • They all come out now. I know a few did already and lack of evidence meant it got nowhere. but they have 300 complaints now and what’s the point. Does not matter to jimmy as he is dead now he will hardly care. He lived a happy life. Its before he did he should have been around to watch everything come apart but he cheated the system and died a hero to many with a happy little smile on his face. What’s it matter now

      Reply
    • How do you know that they haven’t done anything wrong ? It’s not unreasonable to say over a 40yr period some had their suspicions

      Reply
    • Before he died *** typo.

      Red thumbs :) well its true jimmy had the last laugh. Died a hero in his mind. There can be no justice now. He knows nothing about it. My point is why cone forward now? Why did they not all come forward even a few years ago. Its no good when the person is dead

      Reply
    • Whilst it would have been great to see Saville pay for his deeds while he was alive, in coming forward and having their story told, even now his victims may find some peace themselves.

      Reply
    • …why must stories be heard …tell us do!?

      Reply
    • …consider …a mature person was abused as a youngster…kept quiet …some financially fame claiming journalist pursues them…gets them to reveal the incident …a panel judges the evidence decides not enough to pin to perpetrator…what pain misery and damage will the reluctant abused endure now….if people do not want to talk of some thing “unmentionable” then let them alone….they have recovered ….digging it all up again serves little purpose…. having them endure the original incident again….

      Reply
  • wow. I respect them for that. it’s as much as they can do and more than we expected them to do.

    Reply
  • I reckon there is more to come about other people working in the BBC- Is it possible that stories will come out about child abuse in Ireland?

    It seems strange to me that the things that were said by people in the Catholic Church 10 years (no one would have believed me, I was only a junior member of staff, I passed on information which was not acted upon etc) are now being said by staff in the BBC-

    It this just the case of another institution, this time the BBC, trying to protect itself and failing to see the real issue that young people were hurt and there was a cover-up by some of the members of the BBC?

    Like the Church, which claims to care for the most in need, the BBC always claimed to search for the truth. The fact that Jimmy Saville could operate so openly for so long is so shocking.

    Reply
  • It’s tough for the family and for the rest of us hindsight….

    Louis Theroux: So, why do you say in interviews that you hate children when I’ve seen you with kids and you clearly enjoy their company and you have a good rapport with them?
    Jimmy Savile: Right, obviously I don’t hate ‘em. That’s number one.
    Louis Theroux: Yeah. So why would you say that then?
    Jimmy Savile: Because we live in a very funny world. And it’s easier for me, as a single man, to say “I don’t like children” because that puts a lot of salacious tabloid people off the hunt.
    Louis Theroux: Are you basically saying that so tabloids don’t, you know, pursue this whole ‘Is he/isn’t he a paedophile?’ line, basically?
    Jimmy Savile: Yes, yes, yes. Oh, aye. How do they know whether I am or not? How does anybody know whether I am? Nobody knows whether I am or not. I know I’m not, so I can tell you from experience that the easy way of doing it when they’re saying “Oh, you have all them children on Jim’ll Fix It”, say “Yeah, I hate ‘em.”
    Louis Theroux: Yeah. To me that sounds more, sort of, suspicious in a way though, because it seems so implausible.
    Jimmy Savile: Well, that’s my policy, that’s the way it goes. That’s what I do. And it’s worked a dream.
    Louis Theroux: Has it worked?
    Jimmy Savile: A dream.
    [he yawns]
    Louis Theroux: Why have you said in interviews that you don’t have emotions?
    Jimmy Savile: Because it’s easier. It’s easier. You say you’ve emotions then you’ve got to explain ‘em for two hours.
    [a pause]
    Jimmy Savile: The truth is I’m very good at masking them.

    Reply
  • Anyone read this on sky news?

    http://news.sky.com/home/TOPSTORIES/article/1003415

    Clifford is saying that up to 15 “celebs are frightened because they led a hedonistic lifestyle at the peak of their fame”

    Not as scared as the kids felt when they were potentially sexually abused by these so called celebs.

    Reply
  • A truly vile vile man. He was the penultimate pheadophile. I have real symphathy for his vast amount of victims. There is a lot more going to come out of this some very famous personalities. These sick bastards rarely work on their own. May he rot in hell.

    Reply
  • Interesting that the catholic church have chosen to act on this one. My heart goes out to saville’s family, they have to live with the shame of his legacy.

    Reply
  • The church hasn’t even got rid of its own rapists and they are excommunicating a dead man! They need a system to deal with the scale of it !

    Reply
  • BoyLeonZ 28/10/12 #

    Ohh ffs! What a freak!

    Reply
  • The Catholic Church has lobbied to have Jimmy Saville’s knighthood removed.

    I for one am delighted to see such a powerful organisation so set against paedophilia in all its forms.

    Reply
  • I always thought it was odd that within about a week of the story breaking the family not only removed the headstone but had it destroyed. Removing it I can understand but surely if they knew nothing of what he was up to they would have waited for his name to be cleared and put it back. At the time only a few people had come out, I just got the feeling that they realised at that time how big this was likely to get.

    I certainly don’t think you can always say a family should have known what was going on but it seems he was fairly brazen and I can’t imagine they didn’t.

    Reply
  • Have a look here as a starting point. http://victims-unite.net/2011/04/26/uk-social-services-stealing-children-aka-state-kidnapping/

    Just on way put now, can send you more stuff tomorrow if you like. There is a whole global industry based on government sponsored child abduction program’s, aka “protective services”.

    Probably a discussion for the children’s referendum though. The government are asking us to allow then intervene in the same way as UK and USA currently do.

    Reply
    • Conspiracy theorist much????

      Reply
    • Ah that old chestnut! Yawn. Maybe if you weren’t so mad for the Guinness you might see life differently :)

      Reply
    • ….@DBohan…do some history old son… check out how the American government following decades of concerted effort to eradicate the Indian…those remaining had their offspring forcibly sent to schools to de Indianise…forbidden to speak their own tongue…. perform ceremonies…. dress as they wished….cultural brain washing… Read some of the harrowing stories from those still around….. having survived alcohol/drug addiction severe mental and physical abuse….Similarily the Australian Aborigine was subject to the same treatment….

      Reply
  • …just a thought people..a thought worth considering…just what Good has come out of all this… What is the point in digging it all up ….other than to line the pockets of journalists increase sales of news rags…give pleasure to a lot of weirdos to read about and get all worked up about the dross so far published…Causing distress…on their own admittance to so called”victims” and their families…when implored by producers of, “The Dark Side Of JS” to “speak out …Journalists now doing the same..Many peeps have “skeletons in the cupboard”…Those fortunate beings that don’.t clearly would not understand…… those that do feel they are better left in the cupboard…..Mental scars heal much the same as the physical…..come on think about it…..The press never allow a” Band Wagon” to pass without boarding…ever increasing their gullible public for financial gain..Ever meet a moral journalist?…he/she would not get far in the newspaper world!….Come on people think about it…before putting digits to keyboard…think.

    Reply
  • Molesting children has always been the ultimate prize for those in power, this one could go all the way to the top.

    Just this week, Tom Watson MP asked a parliamentary question that links a Paedophile ring to an ex Prime Ministerial aide. See the question here. http://griffinwatch-nwn.blogspot.ie/2012/10/prime-misters-questions-tom-watson-mp.html

    Have a look at this documentary, Discovery Channel banned it. Its called conspiracy of silence, made by Yorkshire TV.

    Did you know over 30,000 children are seized by the UK CPS, never to be seen again? Over 400,000 in America.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hmGFFCr8E0&feature=youtube_gdata_player

    Reply
  • Daniel – You are seriously out of order with that statement.

    Reply
    • In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[3] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[4] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[5] The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself, as in: “That was an excellent troll you posted.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

      Reply

Add New Comment