TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Do you agree with the local government reforms?

Major reforms to the structure of local government in Ireland were announced yesterday, but what do you think about them?

Environment Minister Phil Hogan, Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore and Taoiseach Enda Kenny at the announcement of local government reforms yesterday.
Environment Minister Phil Hogan, Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore and Taoiseach Enda Kenny at the announcement of local government reforms yesterday.
Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

THE GOVERNMENT HAS outlined wide-ranging reforms to the structures of local government with town councils abolished and the number of councillors set to be reduced considerably.

The number of councils operating in Ireland is to be cut dramatically from 114 to 31, while the number of councillors is being reduced from 1,627 to 950 in advance of the 2014 local elections, with around €420 million in estimated savings to be made over the next four years.

Environment Minister Phil Hogan has said the reforms are aimed at the “rebalancing of power to the democratically elected local councillor and away from the management system”, but opposition parties say the move will centralise government power and damage local democracy.

You can read more about the changes being implemented here but today we want to know, do you agree with the local government reforms?


Poll Results:





Read: Number of local authorities to be slashed from 114 to 31

Read: Significant reforms will see planning powers of councillors curtailed

Read: Councils will be able to set their own rate of property tax

Read next:

Comments (54 Comments)

  • I think u need to add an option in the vote for “not going far enough”. Local authorities top heave with self serving people. Like the HSE. We need more groundlings!!!

    Reply
    • Before I seen the options available I thought this would have been my answer! :-)

      Reply
    • I fear the word “reform” has become solely about money,cutting&abolishing…rather than sufficiently changing structures and improving inefficiencies!

      A recent example is the Public Sector “reform” that is occuring.

      Reply
    • All the smaller countries would have similar rates to our rep. levels, though they would have a lot more, and more power at local level.

      You cannot compare a small country like ours to massive ones like those. It just doesn’t make sense.

      As for the idea of having 55 TD’s in the Dáil. That would mean Govt. here would fall apart over night, you think it has been bad up to this.

      We need to look at what countries like Holland, Denmark, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Finland do. Learn from what works for them.

      One thing they all have though is that they are not overly concerned about how many reps they have, and they have lots, but the population are concerned about the quality of work and hold people to account.

      How many of ye have ever gone to a TD’s office to complain about legislation, how many have ever called them up, sent an email and do this regularly.

      If you don’t then all for all your complaining and whinging this mess is as much your fault as any bent politician.

      Reply
    • I disagree. This Fine Gael stunt will mean that unelected officials can exert upward pressure on rates and charge whatever they want. That’s the trick by Phil Hogan. By expanding the municipality, he is effectively making it mandatory for councils to charge above €1,000 on property tax.

      (assuming property tax will be abolished after the next election).

      Reply
    • Big Phil at his best.

      Reply
  • Gerard 17/10/12 #

    now reduce 166 T.D’s to a
    more reasonable number.
    we have 1 TD for 35,000 people
    U.K. 1 M.P per 100,000
    Germany 1 per 95,000
    France 1 per 100,000

    Reply
    • ken-d 17/10/12 #

      Proper order,bring them down to 55 and bring there salary in line with other eu mop,thou u know turkeys don’t for Xmas so this lot would never do it

      Reply
    • There are theoretical arguments that the size of a legislature should proportional to the cube root of the number of voters. It’s unrealistic to compare small and large countries in this regard.

      France is misleading because they have a massive number of Councillors and representatives at local level. To have their proportionality would only leave us with under 50 TDs. Combine that with Seanad abolition and you have a dangerously low number of national representatives.

      Reply
    • I would rather cut the expenses and pay of TDs than drastically reduce the number.

      If we only had 55 TDs then minority voices would find it very difficult to get elected or have much say. Would there be as many independents or a proper opposition with such a small number of representatives? Especially when 30 would be in government as ministers. I really don’t think so. I’d argue that reforming the role of a TD is much more important.

      Much of this reduce the TDs populism derives from the idea we spend a vast amount on the Oireachtas each year. As far as I know it was a total of €100m last year. A lot, but still nothing compared to the waste in other areas.

      Reply
    • New Zealand is a better country to compare Ireland with given their population being around the same as ours, as well as their democracy established a similar length of time.

      They elect 121 MPs using an MMP (voters choose party and constituency candidate) system and have no upper house (Senate).

      Reply
  • We also need to reduce the amount of civil servants and make them accountable for their decisions. At the moment they seem to act on their own whims.

    Reply
  • To me it looks like an aggressive cut in the right direction to cut councils and councilors by so much. We will only know afterwards if there has been any real affects or streamlining but I very much welcome the bold moves by a Government who haven’t done much of note to date to change the system. The numbers look radical, only time will tell.
    I don’t believe the savings of €420 million though. There have been a lot of numbers thrown ’round lately of savings over the next few years. I will be interested to see if they are close to being true.

    Reply
  • It really does not matter what we the little people think, big phil has made up him mind and we must confirm.

    Reply
  • Interesting to see that the number of councils is going down by almost a quarter, while the number of councillors is only going down by less than a half.
    With 114 councils the average number of councillors per council is just over 14. I work it out that under the new proposals the average number will be 30 councillors.

    Reply
  • We need to get rid of the sort of small minded parish politics that allows people like Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to get into power. It should be about national issues, not John down the road who knew your father and fixes all the pot holes. So yeah, cut down on local government.

    Reply
    • Actually, it’s about letting different tiers of government do what they can do best. We know national government – that’s supposed to deal with national issues – works more like local government.

      This needs to change.

      Starting from the bottom, each level needs to specialise in what it does best. District government needs to deal with district-level issues. Regional government needs to deal with regional-level issues. National government needs to deal with national issues. These levels should compliment each other but not overlap.

      This is also the principle of the European Union, and this principle is something we’re obliged to ensure as part of our membership of the EU.

      This seems to be the attempt here. I hope it’s genuine.

      Reply
    • Plenty of Labour and Sinn Féin councillors like that as well.

      Reply
    • Parish politics it may be but the people elect whoever goes in and despite the bankruptcy of the state a shockingly large % of population voted FF, and a large number voted SF – failed terrorists who have strong links to fuel laundering and criminality. Democracy can be a bitch….

      Reply
  • I was following this issue closely when John Gormley was also attempting ‘the most radical’ reform of local government in 100 years. His Green Paper was flabby and, despite his genuine efforts to deliver something he believes in, Fianna Fáil wouldn’t let him relinquish any central power, which FFers think is rightfully theirs.

    I’m actually pleasantly surprised – though cautiously so – that this could be the reform we’ve been needing for a long time. I don’t entirely buy the cost savings argument, but the proposals seems to be very rationally and sensibly set out.

    The fact of the matter is there are no criteria for the creation of dissolution of town councils; why do enormous towns like Naas not have a town council while tiny towns have one – town councils also have no money and very little authority.

    Also, us motorised communter-belt citizens move around a lot more and what we need is much better, more democratic integration between city, town and country. We also need a stronger democratic link to our local governments, and that’s why local taxation is the way to go – even if it’s painful at the start.

    It’s key that local authorities have a much stronger role in business/economic development.

    And this looks like an attempt to give Councils their true role of ‘place shaping’ – holistically creating real places to live your life in that crosses family, economic and environmental life in a more democratic way.

    The ‘municipal’ model, which is the norm in continental Europe, is the best chance we have to make local and regional government fit for purpose. With the chaos this country is in, anything that tips towards ‘whole-of-government reform’ is welcome in my book. Anything that makes the governance of this country more rational has to be supported.

    I wait in hope that my cautious enthusiasm is warranted.

    Reply
    • Local taxation levied locally but still sent to the exchequer as per Minister Hogan yesterday.So hard to hold local councillors to task if monies are sent to central funds only to be redistrubuted throughout the country.

      Reply
    • John Gormley instigated investigations into the planning irregularities of 6 Local Authorities. Phil Hogan swept them under the carpet. While those referred to but not named in the Mahon report are still sitting on Local Authorities there will be no real reform. Only one councillor is in Jail. The investigations must be made; they may cost money but there should be a saving on wages and pensions for corrupt County Managers, Planners Engineers and Politicians.

      Reply
    • That’s also true. And people should be held to account for that.

      At the same time, this could be a chance to fix many, though not all, of the problems of Irish governance.

      What do these proposals have to do with the investigations? They shouldn’t hold up meaningful reform. Assuming this is what it is.

      Reply
    • I jthink meaningful reform would root the rot out first. While some councillors colluded with the corruption, others didn’t they queried decisions and kept an eye on waste. So while nothing is done about the rot the agents we did have to police the local Authorities will be reduced.

      Reply
    • Noel O'D 17/10/12 #

      @Thomas just fact checking you on one point, Naas does have a town council.

      Reply
  • Re my post above: that’s per council. Anyone else think that’s a lot (of too many) councillors?

    Reply
  • Sure we don’t need any of them.

    Aren’t the Troika managing fine without all that democratic interference?

    Reply
  • It will only bring something if the number of councillors is drastically reduced. Can’t go here into details about the uselesness of some because of the libel laws………

    Reply
  • There will still be too many counsellors after this, even at 31! If you put it into perspective Manchester has 1 and it has the same population as the entire country! It should be whittled down to 5! 2 for Dublin and then 1 for the rest of Leinster and 1 each for the other 2 provinces! I agree with the amount of TD’s too! Far too many!
    The entire system needs to change. Enough of this back scratching politics whereby votes are made by the amount of potholes are filled! The “greater good” for the country is what should be on the agenda, not making promises to people in order to stay in power and retain votes!
    In order for any of this to happen however, WE- the people of Ireland- need to change our attitude! Until then we can keep moaning about how hard done by we have been! Time to change folks! Happy Wednesday! :)

    Reply
    • Why do we constantly compare ourselves to the British?

      Reply
    • Well thats another problem for another day Colm. It was just an example for councillors to population. It just happened to be Manchester. I wasn’t comparing us to the British. :)

      Reply
    • Geographically does Manchester cover the same area as the Republic?

      Reply
    • How should we do this?

      Reply
    • Nope! Hence why I said we could probably do with 5 councillors and not 1. I’m only making an observation guys…. the fact is we have too many (not all) over-paid people in this country whose main interest is self- interest and not the COUNTRIES- (note the capitals as I specifically meant COUNTRIES not counties)! Why do we always have to delve into the nitty gritty stuff! The system we have has failed us time and time again. But we still seem to just fumble along. Does change scare us that much?? We can’t get any worse by changing things up, can we??

      Reply
    • You could compare all of England to 2 cities in China. It would be just as pointless and useless to any meaningful way forward.

      Looking at a country like Britain with a vastly different economic story, vastly different scale is completely foolish. Look at countries our size that are really well run. Ironically they all would have significantly more local reps than we have.

      I agree fully with your last 5 lines though.

      Reply
    • Erm that’s flawed population and council maths Keith, City of Manchester has approx 400,000 to 500,000 people and one council, the Greater Manchester urban area has approx 2.5 million people and including the city council, 10 councils!

      Reply
    • Which weirdly if you are using Manchester as a template means that as there is a similar geographical area and it has 2/3 of their population, ergo we should need 2/3 of their council which would be an increase to 6/7 for Dublin alone, which would be something no one would reasonably advocate.

      Reply
    • Damocles 17/10/12 #

      Colm Ó Súiligh, The system was inherited from the British and where the British version has gone through various changes over the years this one hasn’t.

      Reply
  • They,d have to actually show that they are changing the reforms unlike saying that they are going to cut down certain people since they got into government back in 2011.

    Ill believe it when I see it!

    http://www.change.org/petitions/supporting-the-irish-nation-step-down-from-government

    Reply
  • The biggest worry its how corrupt and self serving many local councillors are, giving them more power is genuinely frightening, but detail on this had yet to be released so I’ll be optimistic and hold off judgement until have better idea how all this will actually work

    Reply
  • This government isn’t working for the people. Therefore, i couldn’t give a toss which plann the come up with, its not going to benefit the people. Where is democracy?.

    Reply
  • The answer to Ireland’s problems does not lie within the number of councillors, senators or other elected reps. The answer is in getting rid of the back biters who bankrupted the system and those who are taking their crimes out on the rest of us. Any cuts to representation is a blow to our democratic system. Sadly, we must accept some of the blame for voting out tweedledee and then voting in tweedlemeaner,

    Reply
  • think council is another racket of who you know,,, to get something done, its irish politics once again,, they put foot paths down in a village near me,,, they were put in to high, taken out and redone,, who pays for this,, is the engineer fired, as in any other job of this magnitude, no,, just like the bankers, moved on and given more money to work abroad,, its all a farce, county councils should be made up of people with knowledge, each time one piece of paper given in, has to go thru 10 hands to be signed off,,, or sent off,,, give us mailing address and save paying a salary for a person in office to mail ,,, its quiet ridiculous

    Reply
  • I don’t believe Elizabethan county boundaries should have any role in determining local authority boundaries in 2012. Sadly that will largely remain the case. Notwithstanding local councillors’ past involvement in planning corruption as attested to by the Tribunal reports, it hardly seems likely that transferring what little remains of their role to unelected City/County Managers will improve the ethical-situation with respect to such decisions. At least electorats can remove councillors unlike these bureaucrats. I agree with the abolition of town councils however as a step towards elimination of waste in local government.

    Reply
  • And why a Toika?

    Couldn’t Trap run it on his own?

    Then we’d have a proper Debt-Trap, instead of all this half-measure messing about.

    Reply
  • no

    Reply

Add New Comment