TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

Number of local authorities to be slashed from 114 to 31

That will see the number of council seats reduced from 1,627 to 950.

Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

THE GOVERNMENT HAS announced a number of changes to Ireland’s political system which Minister Phil Hogan has described as the “most fundamental overhaul” of local government in more than 100 years.

The reforms will see the number of councillors reduced by 42 per cent and the number of local authorities slashed from 114 to just 31.

All 80 existing town councils will be placed by a municipal governance, merging town and county authorities, and the number of council seats will fall from 1,627 to below 950. Members elected at local level will also represent the district at county level.

The structures and levels of all payments to councillors will also be reviewed as part of the Putting People First programme.

According to Hogan, the plans will save the State €420 million over four years. He said the changes aim to rebuild the public’s trust in local government again as it currently does not “enjoy universal confidence”.

An Taoiseach Enda Kenny said the coalition is bringing local government into the 21st century with “one of the most radical, ambitious and far-reaching governance reform plans” ever put forward in Ireland.

The proposals will see town councils replaced by Municipal Districts, something Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore said would help local government be more democratic and more responsive.

The Putting People First programme sets to reform structures that are largely unchanged since 1898. Key elements will include:

  • Three new assemblies will replace the current ten regional authorities.
  • Services administered by local authorities will be funded through the new local property tax.
  • There will be a new Independent National Oversight and Audit Commission (NOAC) to scrutinise local government performance and efficiency.
  • Audit committees will be put on a regulatory footing.
  • The power of councillors in respect of planning and certain other matters will be curtailed.
  • The position of local authority manager will be replaced by a Chief Executive post.
  • The two representative bodies of local councillors will be merged after 2014.
  • The overall maximum expenditure in respect of attendance by councillors at conferences will be significantly reduced.
  • The role and functions of the elected council are to be widened.
  • Greater emphasis will be given to the participation of women in politics.
  • One-stop-shops for business support will be provided through new Local Enterprise Offices (LEOs)
  • A new website fixyourstreet.ie will be rolled out so locals can report issues with roads, lighting and other problems.

Hogan said the scheme looks to devolve functions to local level, citing economic plans, housing service plans and the location of educational sites.

“The whole tenet of my policy is to make sure there is a rebalancing of power to the democratically elected local councillor and away from the management system,” he said.

Read: Councils face cull as Hogan reveals plans for local government reform>

Download: the full Putting People First document

Read next:

Comments (84 Comments)

  • About time councilers around my area have done nothing.

    Reply
    • The only thing worse than the local councillors around here are the over paid council executive who have come up with all manner of ridiculous ideas to waste money in recents years. The only good thing the councillors have done was to put a block on some of them. I dread to think what will happen now there’s no one to keep them on the leash.

      Reply
  • we are massively over represented at both local and national level. streamline the hell out of it and then they might do something. give responsibility to individuals ie proper managers not people who become managers after x amount of years service but never manage anything . when everyones responsible nobody is responsible. this is a start

    Reply
  • I would ask those who think this is not a good idea if they have ever been to a town council meeting?
    I have, on a very regular basis and the system as it exists at present is a joke. Many councillors use town council meetings as an opportunity to get their name in the local paper. As a result meetings with no members of the local press present end a lot quicker.
    Also we have a dual layer of local government with the County Council area commitees often discussing the same issues as the town councils.

    Reply
  • Reg 16/10/12 #

    Well done Big Phil! Not read all the details but local government rationalisation is long overdue.

    Reply
  • Hopefully these larger lcal Govt. areas will have meaningful powers, made to be highly transparent etc.

    Reply
  • Well done Hogan! Now maybe you’ll go the whole hog and leave the business of housing Travelers, filling potholes, ‘arranging’ planning permissions etc with the Local Representatives who (unlike yourself) were elected to see to such matters.

    Reply
  • Good that the number of councils are being cut and the number of councillors. Though I suspect announcing it and pushing through will be a difficult job as there will be lots of vested interests at play here.

    Reply
  • ps can we stop this dublin v country siege mentality. its like being at a quinn rally. dublin has over a quarter of the population so needs more resources. plus most of the tds are as red neck as a yokels trailer. ps im from the sticks

    Reply
    • Geographically it’s smaller than the rest of the country, more people live in an area but they would have far more shared issues ie. priory hall

      Should councillors be elected based on geographical area instead?

      There is no Dublin vs. Country thing ….. That match was abandoned when the government got elected. Dublin has evidently received a bye for the foreseeable future.

      Reply
    • It is not Dublin V’s country. We should be looking at Ireland vs corrupt traitors and thieves like FF who view this state as a private piggy bank for themselves and their friends.

      We should make it very clear to the current Govt. that if they turn in to a new FF that they will be destroyed as a party like the last bunch of criminals were in Feb. 11.

      Reply
    • How you bring FF into this I don’t know …… BORING !!!!!

      Reply
  • Hail the king Hogan! Can’t help wondering who really came up with this idea though!

    Reply
  • It’s better than I expected.

    There are a few things kicked to touch (the boundary between Cork City/County, Limerick/Clare, Waterford/Kilkenny; the issue of directly elected mayors [especially outside Dublin]), but overall it marks an improvement on what we have at present.

    And the regional assemblies are now coherently organised into something that could be used sensibly rather than the current situation of 8 that are too small to be useful and a second grouping that is designed purely to maximise EU grants.

    Reply
  • Emmet 16/10/12 #

    Ok 114 to 31 councils saving of only €400+ million over 4years. Great that it’s happening but looks like a wee bit of spin also. Our planning/building control systems needs a total overhaul also and not the new legislation that’s proposed currently. UK system seems to be a lot more effective to me…..

    Reply
    • Exactly, because of inspection and enforcement.

      Reply
    • Noel O'D 16/10/12 #

      Emmet your not comparing like with like, the UK system as I understand it incorporates the local authority functions as we have here but in addition government departments such as health, education and social services are also within the remit of the council. This is the way it is in Northern Ireland, pretty sure it is also the way across the rest of the UK.

      Reply
    • Emmet, planning is part of the overhaul because the bill will implement some of the Mahon tribunal recommendation to curb the power of local councillors with regard to overturning planning decisions.

      Reply
  • You do have to wonder at what is happening to democracy in Ireland. I’m not saying changes aren’t needed – they most certainly are. But what seems to be occurring is a populist revision of Ireland’s democracy – scrap the Seanad, cull the quangos, remove most local government, cut the number of TDs. What a fantastic way of introducing a gaping democratic deficit. We seem to be focussing too much of our attention on singular aspects of Ireland’s governance rather than focussing on the country as a whole and how best to structure it’s governance.

    Reply
    • I had concerns about democratic deficit at local level too, but if you read the content of the document, the town councils are effectively replaced by district councils. That means that everyone has access to that level, regardless of whether they live in a town that has historically had a council or not. The district councillors also sit on the county council.

      I have a slight concern about potential disparities in the number of voters per councillor on that system, but it does at least still leave a very local tier of decision making.

      Reply
    • Chris, I actually agree with both you and the reforms being implemented for local government. I’m just slightly concerned that all these reforms for governance are not being done on a coordinated basis taking the entire system into consideration. The whole system, both local and national, needs reform.

      Reply
  • Fantastic. This is the sort of thing that’s really needed.

    Reply
  • Fantastic idea well done!

    Reply
  • …would it not make more sense to cut the size of the Dáil, and let the local governments handle local affairs, rather than idiots in the chamber?

    Reply
    • Was thinking exactly that Michael.

      Reply
    • Reg 16/10/12 #

      Need that to happen also. Not a case of either or.

      Reply
    • Spot on. This is a ridiculous idea, exactly the opposite of what we need. Continuing FG policy of centralising power in the hands of a chamber which is ill equipped to make best use of it.

      Reply
    • The idiots in the chamber rely on getting the credit for last-minute pothole-filling in their localities in order to get re-elected. This current shower definetely cant risk upstart councilors stealing their thunder in the parish.

      Reply
    • Michael

      Why can’t you give credit where it is due. Local Government will stay completely local but instead of having an Urban Council and a County Council you will have one with higher numbers in the electorate. The duplication of services will also cease . Why would you knock it unless you are merely disguising your membership of a Party that is not in Government and need to knock everything.

      Reply
    • of I remember rightly they have started doing that too. there will be less seats in the next election to the dail

      I completely agree with this decision. way too many councils and councillors.

      Reply
    • Are you serious, the Dail is small potatoes, yeah trim a few out but who cares, Waste in local Government is phenomenal. It is definitely a move it the right direction, but a country of this size and population only needs around 8 properly organised self-financing local authorities that are directly elected and have much more power than they do now, I agree with the comment that power should shift from the centre but it is madness to think we need more CC to do that. We need to take clientelism out of Irish politics by letting CC provide for and make decision that are best for their communities . TD should have no role in any such matters they should be exclusively focused on national matter but then you would really see how useless many of them are. They real question is what happens all the folks whose job are now effectively redundant , no one wants to hear of job losses but I don’t want made up , ineffective roles in the new bodies either . Time for courage of conviction

      Reply
    • There is nothing in this proposal about decreasing the power of local councils and transferring it to the Oireachtas. It’s simply a matter of decreasing the numbers of councils and retaining the existing powers in the remaining local councils.
      Straw-man argument here guys.

      Reply
    • Michael 16/10/12 #

      @Paddy

      It’s pretty safe to say I’m not affiliated with any political party. I agree that streamlining is exactly what needs to be done, but right now there are too many panderers and its costing us a fortune for an inefficient service.

      I could propose thst we privatise a lot of local govt services, but then people will accuse me of wanting greedy rich people to get richer. People want it both ways

      Cake and eating it is the way of the world I guess

      Reply
    • We need to be careful before we reduce the Dail by too much because unless we also change our electoral system, reducing the number of TDs will discriminate more against smaller parties and independents.

      Some people might be happy with that but it potentially means less opposition voices in what will be our only national elected body, if the Seanad is also abolished.

      Reply
    • Yes that worked well for rezoning and planning, didn’t it!

      Reply
    • Well said Michael. Someone who knows what they are talking about.

      Reply
  • In general this seems like a good move. Have some concerns about “Services administered by local authorities will be funded through the new local property tax.” In the UK (I think) anyone who lives in an area contributes to the services because they are the ones that benefit from them, whereas, this will mean only property owners contribute to the local services, not everyone that lives in the area?

    Reply
  • This is overdue but here in waterford we are desperate to keep our city status. It was predicted here that of course cork and Dublin would keep their city status but there were rumours that Galway would lose theirs too but it hasn’t unsurprisingly as there seems to be a driven thing that this government has cork in Munster, Dublin and Galway in Leinster and Connaught respectively.
    As far as hogan is concerned, to hell with limerick and particularly waterford. Hogan doing what Cromwell couldn’t.
    The way he has and is treating this city with his agenda is disgraceful, supposed to be the gateway city in the south east, talk talk closed over a year ago and there hasn’t been 1 job announcement of note since then in between multiple announcements around the country especially in the cities mentioned above.

    Reply
    • Reg 16/10/12 #

      This has nothing to do with city status. One authority is more than sufficient to look after Waterford city and county. I believe the same is happening with Limerick. Limerick or Waterford will not cease to be cities!

      Reply
    • Not disputing that waterford needs to amalgamate but under Irish law a city needs a city council. This is the oldest city in Ireland or at least was up until a few hours ago. Historical city status is bullshit, that’s desperation stuff like hogans own home town.
      Waterford has taken a battering, when I was growing up Galway was a town till 85. Why keep theirs? What’s so special about Galway? Seems to get a disproportionate of jobs compared to this city and region.

      Reply
    • Waterford should keep its city status and its own council.
      Also its hard enough to get the city or county council to do anything what will it be like if there is just one authority? Not any better thats for sure.

      Reply
    • No city status is going to be revoked. Just not going to happen. Why you even think that is unfathomable.

      Reply
    • Realistically this is just a designation status and can be addressed in the bill as to what constitutes a city. Limerick’s councils are being amalgamated as well and nobody is suggesting that Limerick is no longer a city. It will be the same for Waterford. I just don’t understand why Cork and Galway aren’t having the same thing done. Neither has the population to justify two councils.

      Reply
    • Galway has been a city since 1484. The Corporation was restored in 1935. Including the students and parts of the county that are now, for all intensive purposes, part of the city you have 100,000 people.

      Reply
    • Galway is a huge county, with very diverse populations, and many large towns (Ballinasloe, Tuam, Clifden, Loughrea, Claregalway etc…). The city is also very large and acts as the regional capital for Connacht, not just Galway county.
      Waterford is a very small county and only has a couple of towns (Tramore, Dungarvan).

      I guess that is the reason why Galway (and also Cork another very large county with a city which acts as a regional capital) is having two councils.

      That said I think that we could make do with far fewer regional bodies, with more power. I would like to see the civil services reformed first though so that competent people are promoted over those who are there the longest.

      Reply
  • Now cull the number of TD’s, half their expenses and make all vouched. Then get rid of the seanad so that no longer we pay the clown Norris and his like a cent from the tax payers hard earned wages.
    While I’m at it anyone getting more than 100,000 from the state better have handed over at least a kidney for that wage.
    I’d also ban the unions from the public sector. I work and have worked for a US company with no unions allowed and believe me the place is much better without them.
    If you work for the Irish people you don’t need a union.

    Reply
  • is there a practical reason for wanting to keep this city status or is it a vanity thing. city town or metropolis they are all just arbitrary labels to me. pretty much anywhere else in the world places the size of waterford limerick galway and kilkenny wouldnt be even considered for city status. i stand corrected if there are practical advantages to labelling them cities. @dave ryan i have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say in response to my earlier post so i cant respond to you

    Reply
  • Waterford The oldest city in Ireland losing its status as a city I see. It is amazing big Phil hasn’t touched his beloved Kilkenny even thou he wanted upgrade to a city not long ago.

    Reply
  • Will there be any job losses from overstaffed county councils? No? How about procurement savings? No? Maybe efficiency savings from integrating workflows and IT systems? No again?

    Yet more pointless fiddling by this government while the country burns down around them.

    Reply
    • The targeted voluntary redundancy scheme should see an estimated saving of €45m per year from 500 redundancies. €78.8 million has been saved in procurement costs since 2010. According to the plan that was announced future savings will be made through procurement, debt collection measures and standardisation of business processes across the sector nationally to streamline efficiency.
      I really wish people would educate themselves on the facts before they post.

      Reply
    • County Councils are over staffed in the management levels but once again if there is job losses it will frontline staff

      Reply
  • SRDTF 16/10/12 #

    hmm… participative or representative democracy? where will this leave us???

    Reply
    • I don’t get your comment. Anyone can still participate, by running and getting elected.

      But equally there is an issue if there is too much representation in certain areas and too little in other areas, see areas in Leitrim and Dublin. These proposals seem to counter that.

      Reply
    • SRDTF 16/10/12 #

      It’s not about a citizens right to stand to be elected, it is about a citizens right to participate in the decision making process…

      Is there going to be more or less power for the citizens in this structure??

      In a representative democracy (as we have now) the “elected representatives” do what they think is right because they have been elected to represent “the people”. They don’t usually consult their electorate and often take the decisions in their own interests.

      In a participative democracy the citizens are genuinely involved in the decisions that affect their lives, through local voting systems etc…. which I feel is what we should be aiming for in a democratic society.

      Reply
  • Again I think he got this one wrong. There should be 6 to 10 region councils. This councils should be based around the 5 Cities and including larger towns to cover populated areas. These councils would have full control of their regions except where the national interest is required. This would leave the Dail to run the country.

    Reply
    • 100% agree with you Wayne. 10 regional councils will strong local decision making powers and strong oversight on their spending would be the way to go.

      Nevertheless at least this is a start in that direction. We’re down to 31 councils now. At a later stage another minister may be able to reduce further.

      Reply
  • Damocles 16/10/12 #

    Will they be expected to work in August?

    Reply
  • David 16/10/12 #

    Great news. A good start for sure but there needs to be even more slashing in the future.

    Reply
  • Poor Philly, he thought to himself ‘environment; now there’s a ministerial position I can live with! Like Rural affairs or sports’, the poor divil’s busier than Enda!!!!!!

    Reply
  • Peter, you are quite correct with this issue.

    Reply
  • Could be a well-worthwhile initiative. There’s far too much government at all levels. A distinction exists between provision of useful/essential services which must continue and meddling tin-pot politicos who have made a total hames of things in the last decade or so. Too many on the gravy train. Let’s de-rail it.

    Reply
  • In the US state of Oregon, each county has only ONE elected individual who holds a salaried position called the County Judge (not the same as a court judge). This one person makes all the decisions on proposals brought before him. All other county commissioners, whose roles are to represent the people of their county and attract industry and development to their county, are there on a part-time VOLUNTARY basis. They only get a paltry wage (approx $6,000 per year) to reimburse them for the hours they dedicate to their county. They are true public servants….they do not get paid a salary because they are providing a “public service” to their community. When these public servants need to represent their county outside of their jurisdiction, they are given very basic expenses which only cover travel, accommodation and food. These are by no means fun junket events, and are only approved by the county judge. All the public servants who are under the direction of the ONE salaried county judge have their own jobs outside of the county commission.

    Reply
  • Cuts in Dublin…. not likely.

    Not only do they centralise services but now they centralise democracy. Neither will work.

    Its a disgrace how blatantly the country is being used for cuts in everything whilst all remains well and good in Dublin.

    Equality in sharing the burden my arse.

    Reply
  • This is great news.now they will feel how we feel.them and there empty promises.they tell you they will help only for election.all we need now is for the untouchables ie ministers to have there salarys slashed and stop cutting the front line staff.

    Reply
  • Does any body know what town councils are effected or is that informatIon not available yet?

    Reply
  • Unitl there is a Bill drafted and laid before the Oireachtas containing all the above – I wont believe a word of it. The local authorities are the spawning grounds for many politicians why destroy it? There are too many vested interests to change things to the extent proposed…Now to a cynic like myself…if you do see such a Bill laid before the Oireachtas – it will be stalled, delayed and ultimately fall between the cracks just before the next election…meanwhile the current incumbents can gain kudos with the electorate or at least attempt to – for trying their level best to change the status quo only to find it delayed in the maelstrom of all the other “fundamental changes” they are making …and lo nothing will be done…

    Reply
  • ‘According to Hogan, the plans will save the State €420 million’
    Another PR stunt for FG – This is a saving over 4 years…..big wow.
    The Household Charge will make up the difference!

    Reply
  • Here we go again, It’s the HSE nightmare scenario all over again. It will be dismantled in 2020 as been inefficient and dysfunctional. WTF is it with these people?

    Reply
  • “most fundamental overhaul” of local government in more than 100 years. Hmmm I do believe that the 1916 rising and the 1922 have played a bigger part in the last 90 years to local politics. I hate it when a simple fact can totally disillusion a persons character.

    Reply
  • The two most Hated people in Ireland and come Election day they will see just how this hate translates into votes.

    Reply
  • Universal confidence he says. I didn’t realise Fianna Gael represents the whole Cosmos.

    Reply
  • John 16/10/12 #

    do same with politicians…waste of money for such a tiny country

    Reply
  • “fixyourstreet.ie” Hmmm spy on your street more like!

    Reply

Add New Comment