TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Newspaper images could hinder Michaela inquiry – lawyer

The McAreavey family lawyer in Mauritius said the publication of images from the crime scene could hinder further inquiries or the prospect of another trial.

Image: Irish News/PA Archive/Press Association Images

AS THE TÁNAISTE meets with the Irish ambassador to Mauritius this morning about the publication of images of the body of Michaela McAreavey yesterday, a lawyer for the family has said that the newspaper’s actions could hinder the continuing murder inquiry and prospects of another trial.

Speaking to Morning Ireland, Mauritian lawyer Dick Su Wa said that the Sunday Times, which printed 12 black-and-white images taken in the aftermath of the murder on 10 January last year, could have created a problem for the police.

However, he was doubtful that the images had ended up at the publication because of a police leak.

“I have my own feeling…it is not very difficult to make an assessment,” he said but disagreed with suggestions that the photos were given to the paper from someone inside the police force. “Not necessarily….I don’t think within the police force.”

The images printed in the paper included one front page photo of the 27-year-old schoolteacher’s lifeless body with an ‘Exclusive’ tag placed above it. There were also images of her injuries, hotel room 1025, its bathroom and other angles of the crime scene.

Su Wa said he has requested a formal inquiry into how the images ended up in the public domain, adding that he hopes whoever is responsible will be arrested.

The Sunday Times newspaper is a new tabloid in Mauritius and the native lawyer said the island’s other publication would “never have produced such photos”.

“It is clear that they acted against all norms of journalism,” he said. “They have done something that is revolting. They should not have done that…there was no thought for the family, the family dignity, the people at large in the public that are hurt.”

Su Wa was pessimistic about Michaela’s killer being brought to justice. “I don’t like giving false expectations,” he said. “It is a good thing that the police is going to require further.”

He also revealed that independent experts from France and England have been summoned to Mauritius to provide advice to authorities.

Eamon Gilmore told RTÉ that he would raise the issue with the ambassador this morning as the Government is determined to make a “strong protest” about the matter.

The McAreavey and Harte families issued a joint statement yesterday in response to the publication of the pictures.

As the families struggle to come with the result from the trial – this action by the newspaper is not only insensitive to their grief but marks another low in the treatment of John, the two families and the dignity of Michaela.

Yesterday: Govt to make formal complaint over pictures of Michaela crime scene>

Read next:

Comments (36 Comments)

  • Sick and perverse journalism . Nothing changes – trash papers/ trash journalism go hand in hand .

    Reply
    • Open up any of todays papers – photos of Syrian men, women and children blown to pieces and sprawled across a roadside will greet you on the first few pages. Why is this different?

      Reply
    • @creamy this topic is not about syria . and not the same , if it was i would still say that trash papers =trash journalism .

      Reply
    • Syrian photos are different. first of all there is no criminal case or investigation going on in Syria but McAreavey case is still going on eventhough the court is over. Second of all publishing Michaela’s pictures has no public benefit. Third of all publishing war photos in journalism is a part of ‘war journalism’ to influence the public. As well as that this is connected to the private law as it’s causing damages to McAreaveys.

      Reply
  • What a bunch of gross animals… Am ashamed.

    Reply
    • It’s high time for myself to find a way to boycott my own country. Enough is enough. There’s a limit to everything. I can’t boycott them by not travelling there, but there are other means to attempt do as to make the government there to realise that actions need to be taken where need be through major reforms. Our economy depends on 4 industries: Sugar, Textile, Tourism and Finance. I can’t boycott tourism as I have to travel there to see my family. Mauritius highly depend on the EU for sugar exports and there are many European and American high street brands who contract with Mauritian textile factories. I know GAP, Debenhams, Tom Tailor, M&S, Next among few others who have their clothes being produced in Mauritius. The EU should impose a ban or quota on them for Sugar and textile until the Government take a stance on things and get matters sorted. And the whole of the EU should boycott Mauritius by not buying products that are made there.

      Reply
    • We should declare war on Mauritius. How many of em are there?

      Reply
    • Mate about when they publish the mauritian beast in the irish time those two people has been found not guilty so I think it’s time to arrest those who has publish this without proof that should be fair enough

      Reply
  • Well after all this I would be disgusted with someone if they told me they were going to Mauritius on holiday/honeymoon.

    Reply
    • Why? Seems a bit of a strange attitude. If countries were excluded because of bad journalism and messed up criminal cases you wouldn’t have anywhere to go. You couldn’t even stay home.

      I remember reading a story last year about a young child from Blessington who died tragically. The story said something like “The girls father had no comment to make”. In case you don’t get it, that means the reporter asked the man, who had just lost his child, how he felt a few hours later. That to me is pretty disgusting to be honest. I never saw any outrage about it though.

      What happened to Michaela was beyond tragic. But if you followed the trial at all you would probably accept that these two men didn’t murder her. Would you rather they be convicted anyway just to satisfy your anger? The police messed up, like they have in many countries, and I’m sure this case will result in demotions, firings and job losses as well as procedural changes for future investigations.

      Reply
    • I checked out reviews of the hotel on trip adviser out of interest and was shocked to read a few reviews left by people staying at the hotel at the time of this horrific murder and said they would still return regards! How can people feel safe at a hotel who hires these kind of staff and with holds information to protect its name

      Reply
    • Will you be boycotting the Radisson at Heathrow as well. Or all Radisson hotels? Totally over the top reactions seem to be the norm regarding this.
      As for boycotting the entire place , I just don’t get that mentality at all.

      Reply
    • The seychelles or the maldives are much nicer than mauritius

      Reply
    • @Rommel why would you compare these 2 cases? The murder in the then Legends hotel was more than likely committed by hotel staff who were caught stealing, which isnt rare in these kind of resorts! The London murder case wasnt in the hotel but at staff quarters and they knew each other.

      Reply
    • Well I suppose there might be some had it booked before the verdict, the hotel in now called The Lux if anybodies interested. Can’t blame ordinary Mauritians on this but someone had to pay.

      Reply
  • Even if I was given a free trip to that country I’d turn it down. What kind of uncivilized SWINE would think this was ok behaviour??
    There was uproar when the tabloids printed pics of Sadam Hussein’s two sons when they were killed- rightly so, even though they had committed great war crimes and killed thousands.
    This lady did nothing to anybody, she was by all accounts a sweet, kind and religious woman and she was completely innocent in all of this.
    I just can’t get my head around it. Her family have been an inspiration in their dignified stance throughout this ordeal, I can only hope they find some peace somehow.

    Reply
  • How could you feel safe there – incompetent, possibly corrupt police force and a seemingly general lack of empathy/humanity. I wasn’t really in favour of boycott and tarring everyone with the same brush, but in the interest of ones own personal safety, probably a place best avoided. God be with the families, what a nightmare.

    Reply
  • What a bunch of gross animals… Am ashamed. There should be a serious enquiry about how those photos were leaked to the press. The government and the police should answer for this act which there are no words to qualify. As if Mauritius needed that kinda thing especially after all the blunders by the authorities. There are many ways to make the government there feel its past high time to take things seriously. I bet The prime minister there don’t give a s***, coz he’s drunk most of the time and he himself is in Mauritius for holidays only as most of his time is spent in England, on “official” mission.

    Reply
  • ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS…….!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  • The police have always leaked pictures that’s how gore sites get them.
    It’s just so wrong. These people need to be jailed

    Reply
    • Well wrong as that might be, leaking pics of a highly publicised case (the biggest they’ve ever had) was just plain stupid. There was always going to major uproar over this, and their tourist industry (as well as their image on the world stage) has been irrevocably damaged.

      Reply
  • “Irish ambassador to Mauritius!”
    Never new we had an embassy over there. Thought the nearest Irish embassy was in South Africa! There is something going on out there, something far more dodgy than we can think involving maybe government and an extremist/communalist religious group who are politically motivated and who have sources from the lowest to the highest level within the Mauritius Police. I wouldn’t be surprised that those photos were deliberately published so as to affect a retrial should more evidence be uncovered.

    Reply
  • Well said Laura!

    Reply
  • Stop with all this boycott Mauritius nonsense. I would wager handsomely that 9 out of 10 who say they’ll boycott the islands would probably never go there anyway!

    Reply
    • Most would only consider it as a honeymoon not as just a normal holiday. I guess if I was greeting hitched it would have been up there with the Maldives. But now for whatever reason NOONE should go. The eu should push hard on this country.

      It’s not about punishing the island people it’s about forcing the corrupt government and corrupt police to take responsibility. I can guarantee you there are police commanders literally laughing at the situation because there is nothing will happen

      Reply
    • If I were planning a honeymoon it would have been on my list- it’s supposed to be a beautiful picturesque country and great sunshine. Defo won’t be on my list now or in the future- as my mother always said, vote with your feet.

      Reply
  • It is quite obvious that they want to scupper any justice for this henious crime, Women have no value in that culture and it is my inkling that the Bell Boy has been disposed of. Yes, I agree with boycotting that country until this poor family get justice, true justice i.e. the people who did this, not scapegoats. They are putting up smoke screens of seemingly doing something. Its a sham.

    Reply
  • We have an Irish ambassador to Mauritius but none to Iran or Bangladesh. Kinda mad.

    Reply
    • We don’t have any Irish ambassador to Mauritius. Mauritians needing a visa to come to Ireland has to go through the nearest Irish embassy which is based in South Africa. There is not even an Irish Consulate based in Mauritius.

      Reply
    • Irish ambassador to Mauritius is based in South Africa.

      Reply
    • Yes, the ambassador as well as the embassy is based in South Africa, which makes it the Irish Ambassador to South Africa not Mauritius. But I think it’s wiser to say the Irish ambassador to South Africa looking after any Irish interests in Mauritius due to the proximity of the two countries and also due to the non-existence of any embassy or consulate on Mauritian soil.

      Reply
  • Excuse me :) getting hitched. Excuse typos that’s my phone

    Reply
  • Put the newspaper out of business by refusing to buy it, that is if the people of Mauritius are as appalled as we are.

    Reply
  • who cares

    Reply
  • 2 people dead and 7 stabbings to young people last weekend and not too much coverage or too many politicians shouting about it. Omagh bombings pictures the day after and most fatal car accidents have pics shown the morning after without a care for the families. This trial is a circus for RTE and the rest of the media. Not for the poor families of all concerned including the innocent guys who ate being treated very badly. As Irish people with our history one would think we know about injustice.

    Reply

Add New Comment