TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

No clear timeline for approval of cannabis-based painkiller in Ireland

The oral spray Sativex is already available in the UK and preparing to launch in other EU states as a pain treatment for MS patients.

File photo.
File photo.
Image: PA Archive

THE DEPARTMENT OF Health is still exploring how a cannabis-based painkiller could be legally prescribed for use in Ireland amid increasing approval for the drug’s availability in the EU.

The drug Sativex is administered as an oral spray and used to treat spasticity among people with MS. It is also being trialled for the alleviation of cancer pain.

MS Ireland has called for the drug Sativex to be made available in Ireland to MS patients.

The oral delivery prevents the medication from entering the bloodstream too quickly and minimises the development of unwanted psychotropic effects, according to information provided by MS Ireland.

The drug is already available in the UK, Germany, Spain and Denmark and manufacturers GW Pharmaceuticals are preparing to launch the cannabinoid painkiller in Italy, Sweden, Austria and the Czech Republic. Under the EU’s mutual recognition procedure for the approval of new drugs, the product is first authorised in one EU country according to that state’s national procedures. Authorisation is then sought from other EU countries who can approve the medication on the basis of that first state’s approval rather than carrying out their own review.

On 8 May, the company announced that under the mutual recognition procedure, Sativex has met regulatory requirements for approval in ten more European countries, including Ireland.

However, the Irish Medicines Board has confirmed to TheJournal.ie that although the EU mutual recognition procedure for Sativex “recently reached a positive conclusion and the national authorisation phase is now in progress”, the drug cannot be placed on the Irish market until the Misuse of Drugs legislation has beeen altered to allow for its legal sale.

Under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977, the manufacture, production, preparation, sale, supply, distribution and possession of cannabis or cannabis-based medicinal products are unlawful except for the purposes of research.

“I am aware that claims have been made in respect of the possible health benefits of cannabis-based medicinal products, such as Sativex, for patients suffering from certain conditions such as Multiple Sclerosis,” Minister for Health James Reilly recently said in response to a parliamentary question from TD Sean Kyne.

Reilly said he is aware that the drug is currently available on prescription in other countries, and that his department is currently examining how it and other cannabinoid medicines may be legally prescribed in Ireland for the treatment of MS.

Following UK approval of the drug, Minister of State at the Department of Health Shorthall said in February that the department was looking into issues surrounding the provision of Sativex in Ireland, however the relevant legislation has not been amended to allow for its legal sale in Ireland.

Spokesperson for MS Ireland Tara Donohoe told TheJournal.ie that she met with officials from the Department of Health in December to present the society’s position on the new drug and why they believe it should be made available to people with MS.

“We are thankful that they are considering [making it available] but the process is quite slow,” she said. “From our perspective, it’s not about making cannabis legal. The research [on Sativex] has been quite positive – for treating spacisity in particular.”

“If some of the other European countries can make it available, then why can’t we?”

Read next:

Comments (28 Comments)

  • If it was legislation to change the tax system to take in money it would be done in an instant

    Reply
  • Knowing how people suffer first hand with MS and other debilitating diseases like AS I am shocked at how slow and selective the Irish system is about treatments that have been tried and tested in other more developed countries. It smacks of backward arrogant thinking at the behest of people’s quality of life.

    You’d think the Irish State would want to do what they can for their citizens health and well being! But no.

    Anyone who has red thumbed clearly is doing it to wind people up. As no one has given any reason why it shouldn’t be made available.

    Ireland needs to do more for it’s people especially those who are mist vulnerable and more often than not forgotten about in our society.

    Reply
    • Cheebo, as I mentioned above, some form of dose regulation is desirable for patients, so the patient can treat their symptoms rather than sit in a corner stoned. The real issue is how drug companies are abusing the patent system to monopolise markets and generate excessive profits. Patent laws were originally designed to foster innovation so inventors could recieve some compensation for their work, they were never intended to allow multinationals to corner markets, crush competition, and bleed their customers dry.

      Reply
    • If people with these diseases want to get stoned then let them! Only they know what works for their pain.

      Reply
    • No offence Ciara but I don’t forsee my elderly granny toking the reefer to ease her arthritis. If you want to free the weed that another debate and a seperate argument needs to be made.

      Reply
    • Some grans do use weed for arthritis. I’m with Ciara I’m for whatever works. Do you think the drugs people take don’t affect them in a way similar to being stoned? A lot of the time the treatment by drugs is worse than the illness but it’s the only thing available to allow them to have a quality of life.

      The IMB are a disgrace.

      Reply
  • Sativex is a tincture containing the 2 cannabinoids which are most prevalent in the cannabis plant: THC and CBD. Whilst this is certainly a step in the right direction, there is an abundance of evidence from other countries that this medication does not provide the same levels of relief as actual cannabis plant matter which contains hundreds of different types of cannabinoids working in unison.

    Different strains of the cannabis plant have these cannabinoids in different ratios and different strains provide different levels of relief for different medical conditions. I fail to see how a ‘one size fits all’ medication can be as effective. Also why should someone with a medical condition, or the state, pay thousands of euro per year to a pharmaceutical company for a medication which the patient can grow for free in their garden?

    Cannabis is not physically addictive and there has never been even one recorded death attributed to its use in all of medical history. This medicine does not need to be regulated or controlled by any authority. People should be free to grow it if they need it.

    As usual this is all about money. Cannabis is natural and therefore cannot be patented. If the plant is processed into a product, then it can make money for the pharmaceutical companies.

    Free medicine. What a terrible thought! It is no wonder that the pharmaceutical companies are lobbying so hard to keep this, the most useful and beneficial of all plants, illegal.

    Shame on the powers that be. Free the weed! :-)

    Reply
  • The law should be changed ASAP anything that can be reasonably done to alleviate the suffering of those with MS I’m sure would be greatly appreciated

    Reply
  • It’s need the legislators to get a serious dose of something to speed this up,an utter disgrace that people in pain can be helped but these buffoons prevent it.

    Reply
  • When it comes to alleviating such a debilitating condition why on earth does it take so long to pass such authorisation, so many people suffer with this and it must be devastating having to wait in the knowledge that it is available everywhere else.

    Reply
  • Good ol backward Eire never fails to hold back progress an logical thinking.

    Reply
  • i have fibromyalgis and artiris,and i know cannibas would lesson my pain,iam on verys trong pain relief, that are legal,so whats the difference,i wouldnt have the sideeffects i get with those if i took cannibas

    Reply
  • While medicinal marajuana/cannabis is available for medicinal use in a number of countries, including Canada, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Israel, Italy, Finland, and Portugal, there will be no move to make the cannabis plant available for medicinal use in Ireland. Under Irish law it is not recognised as having any medicinal benefits, although in 2003 the Irish Medicines Board granted British Drug Company GW Pharmaceuticals a licence for trials in Irish medical institutions for the use of a cannabis-based medicinal extract in controlling cancer and multiple sclerosis related pain. GW Pharmaceuticals subsequently went on to register a cannabis based medicine called SATVIA for the treatment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis and their patented drug is also in development in cancer pain and neuropathic pain of various origins. Now Voilà! the Irish Medicines Board have decided cannabis (SATVIA) does have medicinal benefits after all. And for a minimum sum of 500 euro for 3 x 10 milliliter vials of their patented drug – although the drug company can charge the taxpayer what they like via the HSE – the executives at GW Pharmaceuticals will go “ching ching” while home growers go to jail for selling the natural drug at a natural price. Think government works in the best interests of the people rather than big business, think again!

    Reply
    • For the record I have no objection to medical cannabis being made available to patients in an clinically optimised dose controlled manner which is sensible and companies need to be allowed recoup their research and development costs – what I do object to is how this is being done behind closed doors in a manner that allows for profiteering at the expense of the public. Let’s not forget that excessive drug expenditure by the HSE means less money for frontline services.

      Reply
  • Eddie, Ive nursed many people with MS and such is the condition that it slowly takes the person its prisoner inside their own body.
    For the sufferer to have the possibility of a drug to alleviate the condition and find that its not yet available here must be devastating.
    Anyone giving this the thumbs down just goes to prove complete ignorance and total lack of empathy.
    I hope that your sister goes into remission :)

    Reply
    • Thanks Jeffery, she’s only 44 and unfortunately her life is somewhat now controlled by MS. She is a very positive person and never complains or moans about her situation….I hope she remits again too, fingers crossed…

      Reply
  • I’m really taken back by the number of people giving the thumbs down to these comments. They obviously have no idea as to the amount of suffering and pain a person with MS goes through….totally disgusted….

    Reply
  • How much money would the Gov lose if they eased the suffering of people by giving them the cure/relief?

    Reply
    • yes. and equally applicable (to minister Howlin’s department especially) is:

      how much resources, in monetary terms (in wo/man hours, paperwork, reports, administration/reference to legal department. parliamentary questions, reports, evaluations, reports, adjournment matters in the Dail) are expended in combating the various individual requests to the relevant minister for persons domicile resident within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Ireland for access to the relevant medical regimen being discussed, and available in Northern Ireland just over the border? Are we back to the condoms debate? This is a completely different kettle of fish. If you are to believe this report, then the issue delaying implementation is a paradigm that medical treatment can in any way overlap with criminal activity under the legislation outlined in the misuse of illegal substances legislation in the republic. If that is so, then the CEO of the manufacturer, the GP of the English-resident tourists (who are cleared by their health authority to travel in the republic of Ireland while remaining on their medical regimen) are liable for criminal conspiracy under the act being currently cited as the “only obstacle” to implementation of this medical provision for the (1000 or less) persons in the republic that would gain a medical benefit from that.
      That is the meaning of Section 20, and Section 21 of the act, being cited by the civil service helpers of minister Rosin Shortfall, as the “remaining obstacle” to providing these patients with an increased medical-provision outcome to address their individual medical-complaints.
      http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1977/en/act/pub/0012/print.html#sec21
      Currently, according to her own legislation, the minister Shorthall is claiming that the UK minister of health foreign office, by legalising (with an Apostille) the medical regimen of UK-domicile resident patients travelling to the RoI, and the Netherlands minister of health, and the German minister of health, and the Danish minister of health, and the Austrian, Italian, Spanish, Finish, you-name-it ministers-of-health, are “criminally liable” for any of their patients who extend their London 2012-trip visits beyond the (invisible?) border with the southern republic.
      In fact, under Section 20 of the “misuse” of “illegal substances” (Ireland) Act 1977, cited by the minister’s ‘social inclusion division’ as the only remaining obstacle to the implementation, that is –if it being applied to patients north of the (invisible) border with the UK– the current minister of health in N.I. is criminally liable for making the provision of the UK (single-market) medicines available to persons for whom s/he owns a professional duty of care to attend to their healthcare complains.
      That is the meaning of Section:20 1977 Misuse of Illegal Substances Act (Ireland), as amended in 1984.
      You state is become a smelly, international-pariah in this area of ‘Research & Innovation’ in medical advances (#FF sleepyheads).
      To those commenting on having experience with persons with multiple sclerosis (#PwMS) in Ireland: please be aware that that in no way compares to the (modern–day) experiences and patient-outcomes of those living in any of the member-states mentioned in this message: bar one.

      Yours.

      Reply
  • because: you’re Irish. Just like the add says.

    Reply
  • Why does someone give the thumbs down to the comment by Yedontsay??

    Pathetic.

    Reply
  • i suffer with ms and any of u that dont doesnt know what ye are talking about so it would be nice if ye shut yier mouths and dont comment

    Reply
  • it does take a good bit of time to take out all the seeds and stems but its worth it , hang in there I’ve got the next toke

    Reply

Add New Comment