TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

At least 15 dead in Pakistan after violent demonstrations

French embassies, consulates, cultural centres and schools were shut in 20 Muslim countries today amid fears they would be targeted by protests against a French magazine.

Image: Mohammad Sajjad/AP/Press Association Images

FRESH PROTESTS ERUPTED across the Muslim world on Friday against a US-made film and French cartoons mocking Islam, with violent demonstrations in Pakistan leaving at least 15 people dead.

France

France, where a magazine this week published a series of cartoons mocking the Prophet Mohammed, has shut embassies, consulates, cultural centres and schools in 20 Muslim countries, fearing the fury will spread from US targets.

Pakistan bore the brunt of the anger today, with huge crowds of demonstrators throwing stones and setting buildings ablaze to denounce the film.

There were clashes in the country’s five largest cities leaving 15 dead and 219 others wounded, as protesters defied government calls for peaceful demonstrations on what was declared a national holiday in honour of Mohammed.

Police fought back with gunshots and tear gas as arsonists and looters attacked cinemas, banks, shops and restaurants in Karachi, where outbreaks of political and ethnically-linked violence have killed hundreds this year.

Two cinemas were also torched and ransacked in the northwestern city of Peshawar, on the edge of tribal belt strongholds of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

In Karachi, a policeman who died after being shot when officers used tear gas to disperse a crowd near the US consulate was among 10 people killed in the country’s largest city.

Five people were killed in Peshawar, including the driver for a TV channel which blamed police for his death.

In Islamabad gunshots were also fired outside the five-star Serena Hotel and police baton-charged some 8,000 protesters trying to penetrate the heavily-guarded diplomatic enclave.

Day of love for the prophet

The government had declared Friday a “day of love for the prophet”, but for hours shut down mobile telephone networks in an apparent bid to prevent extremists from exploiting the protests to carry out bomb attacks.

Prime Minister Raja Pervez said:

It is our collective responsibility to protest peacefully without causing harm or damage to life or property.

Washington has warned citizens not to travel to Pakistan and spent $70,000 to air TV adverts in the country disassociating the American government from the film.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reminded governments of their “solemn duty” to protect diplomatic missions, saying that “they must be safe and protected places”.

In the Arab world, Sunnis and Shiites took to the streets of Lebanon, while there were also demonstrations in Basra in south Iraq and in the Yemeni capital Sanaa.

Tunisia had banned all demonstrations amid fears of violence and Libya’s second city Benghazi braced for rival demonstrations by a jihadist militia and its opponents.

There were also demonstrations across Asia in Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan and Bangladesh, where about 10,000 took to the streets of Dhaka to condemn the film and the French cartoons.

Read: US runs Pakistani TV adverts to denounce anti-Islamic film>

Read next:

Comments (34 Comments)

  • Absolute Spacers..!

    Reply
  • An Irishman, Englishman and a Scotsman get in the back of a Muslim taxi. He tells them to get out as he can’t take a joke

    Reply
  • @Tom Fitzgerald I’m to old for fairytales. This is criminality plain and simple. Fear and lack of education is what is driving this nonsense. Burning down a cinema? Yep, those moving picture’s are pure evil…

    Reply
  • Pakistan has a day of love for the prophet but not in a gay way. Gayness bad, men loving 7th century man good.

    Reply
  • Religious bigots come in many different shapes and forms — depending on whose divine authority they presume to possess — but a common ideology that binds them across the world is stupidity.”

    Reply
  • Religious nonsense , violence for religion is hypocracy , so an idiot from a country if 300 million does something stupid and you target everything American , a satirist from France , target anything French , and on it goes it’s mind numbingly idiotic , people front of judea F off

    Reply
  • It’s getting very hard to stay politically correct when commenting on these horrific reoccurring events.
    Religion is such a destructive human concept!

    Reply
  • Saw the president of pakistan on the news earlier, he was pandering to the crowd saying Islam is a “religon of peace and tolerance”, as opposed to what? As he was saying this, the camera cut to shots of the peaceful and tolerant muslims killing and destroying the place. And they want to dictate to the rest of the world, I don’t think so?

    Reply
  • I have made the comparison between religion and psychosis here at least a hundred times. Now is opportunity 101. Again someone will say its not religion its just bad people.

    Reply
  • These guys are living in the dark ages

    Reply
  • Medival clowns…

    Reply
  • I think we are lucky to live in Ireland,we are a peacefull and friendly nation compared to the rest of the world.The customers in the pub say if we got rid of some idiots in the goverment it would be a lot better.

    Reply
  • Apologies “should be” not “is”
    Nobody has the right to kill or abuse another in the name of “their religion”

    Reply
  • Mindless

    Reply
  • So much hate and violence in the name of religion
    Basis of any faith is peace and mutual respect
    Whatever you perceive your God to be we have a wonderful world to live in but are self destructing

    Reply
    • “Basis of any faith is peace and mutual respect”
      Peter you are joking aren’t you?

      Reply
    • Peter there are in excess of 3000 branches of Christianity. The reason being it is not empirical and the imagination of humans is endless unlike empirical evidence. Coupled to this is humans evolutionary trait to blindly follow leaders and form cultural belief which is every bit as strong as genuine factual belief and also that the Judeo Christian holy books are intrinsically violent, predispose religion to inevitable intolerance at best and outright massacre of our species at worst. If 16th century religious leaders had access to 21st century military technology we would probably be extinct.

      Reply
  • Great idea this National holiday to o burn things!

    Reply
  • Xadovan 21/09/12 #

    Japan?

    Reply
  • Seems I upset journal editors with previous comment, truth within nonetheless.

    Reply
  • mart_n 21/09/12 #

    And the guy responsible* continues to enjoy full police protection…

    Okay, I know that he isn’t fully responsible for the actions of others, but he is the one responsible for purposely antagonizing people. And before someone comes up with a ‘freedom of expression’ argument, the guy in question doesn’t care about that. He and his cronies set out to cause people to react.. I don’t know how he hasn’t been arrested for hate crimes or inciting violence. He’s a religious nutjob himself so not much better than those taking to the streets because of his actions.

    Reply
    • He’s a tool, I grant you that, but to say personal feelings of insult are in any way at all mitigating factors for murder is bonkers. If I say you have stupid hair and you knife me, it’s YOUR crime.

      Reply
    • Erm, it’s a satirical magazine. You know what that means right? As it’s target audience isn’t stupid superstitious Muslim extremists but people with a sense of humor who enjoy satire I doubt it was for their (Muslims) benefit in any way. More then likely it’s purpose was the same purpose it has every other week when it pokes fun at other people!

      Reply
    • Mart A nut job for poking fun
      at Islam? Calling a skeptic of religion religious is also profoundly ignorant. The idea of someones free speech being responsible for the psychotic nuts that religion manufactures is utterly morally reprehensible. He does deserve police protection and as a citizen of the civilised world he is perfectly entitled to print what he did. The Catholic Church practiced this form of savagery in the middle ages but was civilised to a limited extent by people of courage speaking out and risking their lives for the progress of humanity.

      Reply
    • mart_n 21/09/12 #

      I was talking about the director of a video, not the editor of the magazine. And he isn’t irriligious, he’s a hardline coptic christian with a colorful criminal history; hence my surprise at how he hasn’t been arrested over this.

      Reply
    • My apologies Mart I take back everything I said I was was thinking of Charlie Hebdo hence my reference to print and not film. Yes the director of that movie is a religious nut. But he still is entitled to speak and entitled to police protection.

      Reply
    • mart_n 21/09/12 #

      Fair dues, Cyril. Yeah he is entitled to speak, and to hold and share his opinions. But laws do exist (sedition & blasphemy) which in these instances should imo be utilised. It’s up to the police to determine what his motives were, I’m sure it wouldn’t be too difficult for them.

      In all walks of life there are ‘laws’ to highlight the line between what is acceptable discourse and unnecessary diatribe. If someone speaks against the rules of this site, they’ll be banned. If you tell a bouncer what you think of him; you’ll most likely be thrown out. The line between the right of one to speak, and the right of another not to be subjected to abuse doesn’t need to be blurred in any way. There’s as much rationale in defending this guys actions as there is in defending the opposing side.

      Reply
    • It’s interesting, Fox News, I know not exactly a bastion of the free press, but they have reported that a piece of artwork known as “Piss Christ” will be be displayed at a gallery in Manhattan in New York this week. The artwork was created in 1989 and funded through prize money provided by National Endowment for the Arts, it features a photograph of a crucifix submerged in the artists urine.
      Christian religous groups in America are already comparing this to to the film and cartoon that so insulted muslims and have invited the White House and president Obama to condem this as he did those. Maybe it would be best if everyone just agreed to find things insulting and leave it at that, and for politicians everywhere to stay out of it and stop fanning the flames further. What are the chances?

      Reply

Add New Comment