We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Rosemarie Loftus, President of the Law Society of Ireland and Sean Guerin SC, chair of the Council of the Bar as part of today's demonstration. irishphotodesk.ie

Planned changes to legal aid payments will lead to 'exodus' of solicitors, Law Society says

Thousands of cases have been impacted since criminal law solicitors withdrew their services over upcoming reform of payments.

PLANS TO CHANGE the payment model for criminal legal aid work will lead to an “exodus” of solicitors from the area of practice, the president of the Law Society of Ireland said today.

Rosemarie Loftus made the comments this morning as thousands of cases have been impacted since criminal law solicitors withdrew their services over upcoming reform of payments.

The introduction of a flat-fee payment model for District Court cases under the legal aid system means that from 1 July, solicitors will receive a single payment of €455 for District Court criminal cases regardless of the number of court appearances involved.

The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, Irish Penal Reform Trust, Free Legal Advice Centres and The Bar of Ireland joined the Law Society of Ireland at the Criminal Courts of Justice in Dublin today to protest the planned changes to the legal aid system.

Loftus described the proposed pay cuts as “an absolute insult to the legal profession and to the public it intends to serve”.

She said it is hard to overstate the level of anger amongst practitioners, and many are assessing on an individual level whether to exit the area of work.

“It will render criminal legal aid practices unsustainable financially, and therefore for many solicitors it will trigger an exodus from this area of practice and make the most vulnerable in our society in a situation of even more vulnerability because of lack of access to legal representation,” Loftus said.

“It’s not reform, it’s a cap on justice.”

Solicitors took industrial action last week when they withdrew their services in cases involving an accused person on bail, meaning they are temporarily released from custody and awaiting trial.

The solicitors will continue to act in custody cases they are already working on and in certain cases involving juveniles.

Speaking to The Journal, solicitor and Law Society spokesperson Mary Lavelle said “it’s just not sustainable to stay in this area if this measure comes in”. 

“I think a lot of people will have to leave the sector, or they’ll only take on private work, which is few and far between in criminal law,” she said.

Lavelle said she doesn’t see how solicitors will be able to “sustain the level of care” currently given to clients, particularly vulnerable clients, if the new model is brought in.

“I do think it will impede their access to justice, because, as I said, I do think it will be an exodus of solicitors from the area,” she said. 

The Law Society of Ireland, as well as hundreds of solicitors, are opposed to the new payment model – but Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan has indicated he won’t back down.

Last week the Department of Justice carried out a report which found that solicitors were “maximising” their earnings through criminal legal aid payments. After the report was released, O’Callaghan said “there are very clear abuses going on in the system”.

Loftus wrote to O’Callaghan to express the law society’s concerns with the report, which it said made assertions that are “flawed and are not a true reflection of practice in this area”.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday, O’Callaghan doubled down on the report’s findings, saying the current payment system “incentivises adjournments because you get paid an extra sum every time you adjourn the case”.

Additional reporting by Emma Hickey

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds