TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Pedestrians to have priority over cars in new Dublin plan

A new report proposes a “pedestrian-friendly city” in which through vehicle traffic would be “actively discouraged”.

Image: Julien Behal/PA Archive/Press Association Images

DUBLIN IS TO become a “pedestrian-friendly” capital – with cars only a secondary priority as developments are planned, according to a draft proposal for the city’s future.

Planners foresee that the “predominant movement pattern in the city centre will be on foot”, the document states, while cars passing through the city centre en route to other destinations will be “pro-actively discouraged”.

Dublin City Council is inviting submissions to its Your City, Your Space plan, which was published in draft form last year.

It states that increasing congestion in the city centre makes it essential to prioritise pedestrians and public transport over cars, and calls for the creation of a “pedestrian-friendly city with a world class public domain.” The report states:

On foot, by bicycle or by public transport will be the main modes of access and through-traffic will be pro-actively discouraged. While economic needs require private car and service vehicle access for business and shopping trips, the predominant movement pattern in the city centre will be on foot.

The draft report also urges efforts to preserve the historic and local character of specific neighbourhoods, such as the Georgian squares.

It sets out a plan for development which divides the city into zones, including the “Liffey Corridor and Civic Spine” – the quays, O’Connell Street, Westmoreland Street and Dame Street – and the “primary” shopping areas of Grafton Street and Henry Street.

There is also a call for increased focus on public spaces, including Barnardo Square between Dublin Castle and the City Hall; Beresford Place behind the Customs House; and the Fish Market space in Smithfield.

City manager John Tierney told the Irish Times that the report is not designed to produce major upheavals or large redevelopments in years to come, but provide a better framework for carrying out everyday public works.

Submissions are open until January 25.

More: Vacant sites “should be used for community projects”>

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • that’s the sort of plan lots of Dubliners have been crying for for years! Dublin City center is crossed by motorway-like big roads that make the area pretty unbearable, extremely noisy, stinky and very risky too (especially since lots of drivers think traffic lights shouldn’t be cared of durring peak time). Streets and roads are public spaces that belong to all citizens, and the argument brought by drivers who claim the roads because they pay high taxes is invalid (unless they sue the gov. in high-court and change constitution). Cars in cities are generally space invasive and are known to devaluate property market. Last thing: It rains more in the Netherlands than in Ireland, yet, Amsterdam is almost car free..

    Reply
  • When I hear the words public transport I end up in a fit of laughter as this term is a joke unless you live close to a city.
    I live in Kilpedder Co.Wicklow and when my daughter wants to go to dundrum shopping centre she has to first walk to the bus, then take the bus to the dart, take the dart to dublin and then take the
    Luas back to Dundrum. Before you even get there half the day is gone.
    Talking about Luas… W H Y is there no park and ride facility from Brides Glen ???
    Huge amounts of empty space all around and not a single parking space.
    Leo Varadkar…please get your finger out and clean up this utter mess of a transport system.
    And I dare you to wait at the local bus stop ( not shelter ) in the winter.

    Reply
    • It’s a fact of life that better public transport options will be available to larger population centres. In the context of Dublin, a public transport journey between different suburbs of the city will usually involve a number of changes, so it should be no surprise that there are no direct options linking an outlying rural area to a Dublin suburb.

      Reply
    • Just a thought – she should get a day rambler from Dublin Bus, get the 184 to greystones or bray, get the 84 to Cherrywood and the Luas stop is about 5-10 mins walk from the Cherrywood stop. It’s so far away as they were meant to be building an even bigger shopping centre than dundrum over the two stops & motorway – hence the big empty space..
      It’s a pain in the you know what – but this should work out cheaper and more convenient.

      Sadly, the 84 is hourly, but you can get the 145 from bray, get out and walk a little further (from the N11 – the stop just after the cherrywood flyover) it’s about 5 mins more, likewise when coming back, the 145 goes from the other side of the flyover. You can meet up with the 184 at the Gala on bray main street..

      Still way easier than how it used to be to walk up to Sandyford Luas from the N11 :(

      Reply
  • Brilliant idea, overdue in my opinion. For all those who think the city will become inaccessible, the fact is all the city centre car parks will still be available with these improvements, it just means once you get out of your car, the experience will be improved dramatically. Why is College Green so shabby and unpleasant to walk through when it could be the greatest public space in Ireland? Didn’t wider footpaths vastly improve O’Connell Street? Wouldn’t Westmoreland Street be incomparably better with similar wider footpaths, cleaner without so much visual clutter in the form of signs and randomly placed street furniture? This plan will improve the experience of the city for tourists too, helping tourism. It’s win/ win as far as I can see. Obviously the public transport needs to be continually improved too, which is happening with the Luas link up.

    Reply
  • Excellent idea.

    I trust then that some of my car tax will be refunded to be replaced with a walking tax ???

    Reply
  • The number of umbrella eye-gouging incidents will soar. Wet, tired, cranky walkers…? More pressure on health service. :p

    Reply
  • You can bet the driving route into city council offices won’t be pedestrianised!

    Reply
  • I think it’s a fairly good idea to be fair.
    Ok, people will have to walk.
    Though eh.. isn’t it about time for most of them? >:D

    Reply
    • There seems to be a misconception that “people will have to walk”. It will still be possible to drive to, through and park in Dublin City; this plan simply means to improve the public realm- the quality of experience for all users of city streets (most of whom are pedestrians).

      Reply
  • Ciaro 04/01/12 #

    Millions given in tax breaks to build car parks, monkeys would manage the city better than DCC

    Reply
  • If they want to encourage people using the city as pedestrians more often it seems strange that for so long they have been removing public toilet facilities, public seating, having city center bus stops with no rain cover (nassau Street for example), and leaving pavements in rag (if not dangerous) order in some cases ( temple bar cobbles are a joke at this stage with broken stones and embedded glass). If they want people in numbers in the city then they have to provide the basics to allow them to move freely, rest, and shelter. Basic stuff, but I doubt seriously the Council are up to the task with their hands off, we’ll only fix it if it is reported, attitude.

    Reply
  • another good idea bad idea time !

    Reply
  • Do planners not realise we live on a rainy little island? Car free zones work great in Spain, but dragging your wet miserable self around without a vehicle in irish towns and cities is why we all end up in giant dry covered shopping centers in the burbs instead.

    Removing the vehicle access sucks the soul right out of irish towns. Don’t do it.

    Reply
    • Dublin has a similar number of wet days as cities like Copenhagen, where a third of all journeys are by bicycle.

      Reply
    • Paul 04/01/12 #

      Galway is twice as rainy as Dublin and the city centre is almost entirely car free. People predicted that pedestrianisation would kill the city centre…hasn’t happened yet. Same happened when Grafton street was closed to cars. You may need your car if you’re doing a big family shop and if that’s the purpose of your trip you’re likely to stay in the burbs anyway.

      Reply
    • P Wurple…
      I couldn’ agree with you more.
      Great post.
      And furthermore I don’t agree with Brian Meade.
      What is the problem with providing a basic shelter for rural bus stops as out here we have to wait for a long time for a bus to show up.
      If we are unlucky, it won’t show up at all.
      Why are the two Luas lines not linked up?
      Why do we not have a direct rail link to dublin Airport?
      If it wasn’t for so many private operators we would be in a bad way.
      It is obvious that this and previous governments have no long planning strategy.
      No wonder that the EU/IMF have taken over the fiscal running of Ireland.

      Reply
  • Only way that could work is if the public transport system pulls it’s head our of it’s arse. Tighten up,a bus or train that’s on time would make a huge difference. Standing in the rain for 30-45 minutes,weighed down with shopping bags, waiting for a bus is a joke and would put anyone off. Whereas,going to a city and having a wander around,doing a little shopping,heading to a bus SHELTER for a bus that arrives on it’s scheduled time and getting to another destination would actually be lovely. I’d go to Dublin much more if that were the case. Last time I went in though I had my son in the buggy,ignoring all the other details, the train ride was awful. It was 25 minutes late and we were pushed around pretty badly. That’s a few months ago,I just don’t want to bring my son in around that crap again

    Reply
  • Melvin 04/01/12 #

    TED Talk Paul Steely White of Transportation Alternatives New York http://youtu.be/PQ47OByEyLY

    Reply
  • Without a truly viable alternative to private transport in the city (and without any forseeable prospect of a metro system) this is yet another short-sighted plan from our masters.

    Reply
  • Yet another reason not to go near Dublin City.

    Reply
    • Why? Because it will be pleasanter to walk around, more attractive and cleaner?

      Reply
    • No Stephen. it’s because it will be more expensive for those of us with no other method of getting to Dublin other than car. plus, access to your car in the city centre allows you buy more as you can pop over and back to your car. instead of being able to buy warlords of goods in Dublin city centre, people like me will now only be able to buy harmful of goods. this removes the incentive to go in the first place. More expensive to go and when you do go you’ll get less out of it…

      Reply
    • warlords should have read carloads. predictive text…

      Reply
    • And harmful?

      Reply
    • It’s a well known fact that petrol heads have smaller brains than goldfish and are not endowed with any imagination.

      If you head far enough east, you’ll come to the shoreline. This is possible by car. Beyond the shoreline is a lot of water. We call this the sea. If you can find some way of crossing the sea (there’s these things called boats. Many are propelled by internal combustion engines, just like cars), you may arrive at another shoreline. Beyond the shore there may be a town or city. Do not fear. Many such places are friendly and cheerful. They did away with city centre traffic years ago…

      Reply
    • Brian, as per my comments below, nobody is proposing a ban on cars in the city. Dublin City Council has always had to allow vehicle access to privately operated car parks in it’s civic improvement/ pedestrianization schemes- this will not change. You will still be able to travel in by car- but a car lane here or there (like Westmoreland Street, with 5 traffic lanes in one direction) can be given over to pedestrians. The headline of this article is misleading- improving the public realm by enhancing the pedestrian experience does not prohibit the city being accessed by cars. Also I don’t see your point about it being “more expensive”.

      Reply
  • Dave 04/01/12 #

    Great idea – but we need the public transport infrastructure before much of the proposals can reasonably be enacted!

    Reply
  • Good, hate cars in the city! Only taxis, buses and various public servants should be allowed drive in the city.

    Reply
  • Watch the number of claims sky-rocket!!!

    Hard enough drivin thru the city as it is, with amount of idiots who just step out in front of you!

    Reply
  • Bad idea. :( traffic has eased significantly in the past 4 or 5 years

    Reply
    • The volume of traffic doesn’t affect how much space pedestrians have in such bottlenecks as College Green/ Westmoreland Street. Addressing the public realm in College Green is long overdue.

      Reply
  • Until we have a decent public transport system how can anyone expect people not to use their cars.
    Try get a dart or Luas around 5pm from the city and tell me that’s a pleasant way to travel.
    Just this week all public transport hiked up prices.
    Sorry Until there’s a proper system I’ll use my car.

    Reply
  • Blah, blah blah, forget about investing in giving Dublin a facelift and put the money into schools and health. I met somebody at the weekend who had 50 people in her primary school class. Put the money into the actual welfare of our citizens and not superficial things like this.

    Reply

Add New Comment