TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Priory Hall: ‘Families have had to press pause on their lives for the last year’

As the one year anniversary of their evacuation appoaches, ex-residents of Priory Hall are planning a ‘March for Justice’ as they continue their search for a solution.

Darren Kelly and his 3 year old son Evan at a Priory Hall protest last December.
Darren Kelly and his 3 year old son Evan at a Priory Hall protest last December.
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

AS THE ONE year anniversary of their evacuation from Priory Hall approaches, its residents feel no closer to a solution.

Having evacuated their homes on 17 October last year, Graham Usher, a previous occupant of the development, believes that ‘the Government has made every attempt to avoid this issue for the last year and they’d be completely happy for it to disappear’.

To mark to unhappy anniversary, the residents have planned a ‘March for Justice’, which is due to take place this Saturday at 2pm at the Donaghmede Shopping Centre.

Speaking to TheJournal.ie, Usher believes that ‘the state and the local authorities are trying their best to avoid our situation’.

There is a resolution process in place, but the fact of the matter is that no work that we are aware has been carried out. If it needs to be knocked down, knock it down. If it needs to be fixed, fix it.

One year on, life for the 256 former occupants could be about to get a lot worse.

With Dublin City Council going to the Supreme Court to try to stop paying our rent, we’re still facing the situation where families are going to be out on the streets. If they’re successful, we’re going to be in serious trouble.

Despite some residents having moratoriums in place so that they aren’t currently paying their mortgage, Usher knows that this isn’t a long-term solution.

“As the time passes, the interest continues to build,” he says. “Even if a solution is found, people may well find themselves too far behind [on their mortgage] to catch up.”

Families have had to press pause on their lives for the last year. We need an end to the limbo that we are in.

In pictures: Families pack their belongings at Priory Hall >

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • Aarum 08/10/12 #

    As have people suffering from pyrite, it’s not right the developers can just walk away and declare bankruptcy and then start a new building company

    Reply
  • Certainly it’s a long time since anything has been mentioned in the media about them, and I had forgotten about the situation assuming it had been resolved as I hadn’t heard any recent news. I think a March on Leinster house where they’d be highly visible would remind the public more but either way a bit of press can’t hurt them

    Reply
  • Write off the mortgages,give them deposits for new properties of their choice, there are plenty at half the price .its done all the time in regeneration areas.the residents are given an option of where they want to live and their old house is knocked .why can’t it b done here.

    Reply
  • There was always a Clark of works on sites like this size many years it was his job to make sure every thing was proper and correct the last time I worked with one was on the first Luas line never seen one after that , they worked for the Local government body .Yes it was greed on behalf of the developer but who changed these rules I think there to blame for letting cowboys build these blocks and they will keep coming up as time goes by

    Reply
  • Jay 08/10/12 #

    Plenty of nama properties out there. Given the awful circumstances they should be rehoused to one.

    Reply
  • The banks simply let them get a property for half the price as property has dropped by 50% write off the other half . Then the banks (mortgage provider)can sue the council as they had a duty of care to ensure the properties were sound .and these people can get on with it .do not get the problem here. Again innocent people being stressed no fault of their own .

    Reply
  • Well isn’t it the tax payers prob when they have to b given social housing .such s—- that people are being forced to accept .a big Nama bulldozer knocking perfectly good houses and people forced to live in accommodation they don’t want to b in with a threat of homelessness .they should b getting compensation and a thousand apologies not abuse .

    Reply
    • Exactly Eilish. Thereu is an estate around the corner from Priory Hall unfinished with houses boarded up just waiting to be lived in- why not get them finished by selling McFeehilys properties in NAMA and rehousing some residents there….gets the families sorted, gets rid of an eyesore and an unsafe unfinished site..

      Reply
  • Faulty product sold ,if it wasn’t in a sale u get ur money back . Insurance I suppose .

    Reply
  • B Lowe 08/10/12 #

    Is it time for an armed revolution? Absolutely disgraceful the way these people have been treated. It could be any one of us in their position. How would you feel? Just disgraceful. The government can bring in legislation for new taxes in weeks yet for cases like this it does nothing and relies on existing egiskstiin which just does not cut it.

    Reply
  • Tragic story but exactly why as a taxpayer is it my problem?

    Reply
    • Because it could be your home next, maybe fire issues or pyrite or radion or something else.

      Reply
    • Because it was the the local government working on your behalf that was responsible for ensuring that the building was built to standard. Instead they allowed the RIAI away without taking any responsibility for their work & the Developer was allowed away scott free… all due to corrupt legislation biased towards making wealthy people more wealthy at the cost of the working & middle classes.

      I’m not saying its fair, but the local authority are responsible for this situation for not inspecting the building and making sure it is up to standard. The architects for refusing to stand over their work (a certificate of compliance isn’t worth the paper it is written on, seriously you should read one, its hilarious). The Developer is in this case (I believe) has acted in a criminal way & should be accountable for all costs… but that is a matter for the courts…

      Reply
    • Paul, the only way an architect can completely certify a building is if he witnesses absolutely EVERYTHING on site before it’s covered up with finishes. On a project the size of PH this would require say 30 architects on site, every day from 6am – 8pm. That’s just ridiculous (and would also multiply architects fees by a huge factor given the additional time that would need to be spent on a job – so you couldn’t afford to hire this kind of service anyway!). The engineers/architects certify DESIGN, not construction. To construct in accordance with e design is the contractor’s responsibility.

      Reply
    • John F 08/10/12 #

      @Jay. Pyrite problems shouldn’t fall on taxpayer either, accountibility lies with the developer, source of pyrite contamination (quarry). All of these entities should have liability insurance? Surely this is common practice! Everyone wants a bail out from the Taxpayer, it seems to be the norm these days! I wonder did any of the Priory Hall buyers get any independent assesments or surveys done before they handed over their money?

      Reply
    • I’m inclined to agree with you Kingston, builders have liability insurance so do architects etc. let the insurance pay for it and jail all involved for 30 years to make an example of them. taxpayer seems to pay for everything in this country, where do you draw the line?

      Reply
    • @ JohnF when you buy an apartment it is not possible or practical to open up the walls or look into the foundations. A professional survey/snag which many Priory Hall owners got wouldn’t have turned up the problems that presented themselves later on. For most of the construction you rely on the building certs and fire certs which were provided prior to completion. You should have the confidence to rely on these certs, if the local authority did their job properly.

      @Conor many builders do not have liability insurance and it certainly wasn’t compulsory

      Reply
    • jailing them is just going to cost the taxpayer again. the ever winning insurance companies should cover the cost of the repairs, the contractors/developers should have their name placed on a black list never allowing them near a building site again.

      Reply
    • What do you mean jailing them is just going to cost the taxpayer again??? maybe so, but it’d be money well spent!!
      You think this doesn’t qualify as real crime?? If those responsible for this type of screw up were held accountable perhaps the country wouldn’t be in as big a mess as it is. Even if this was accidental, something overlooked rather than malicious (which I severely doubt) they should still be held accountable. These people have had their lives put on hold because various companies involved were too lazy to do their jobs properly or out for a quick buck!! The culture of short cuts when doing these types of jobs has to be stopped!!
      Typical in the housing industry, remember drive by valuations??? what hell were they about?? it’s ridiculous!!
      @Kingston, as a citizen of the Republic of Ireland it’s your problem because you want a fair society for all citizens, so they get justice where it’s due, and criminals are held accountable for their actions. Incompetence and ignorance does’t negate the crime.

      Reply
    • @Kingstown

      It is your problem, it’s my problem. It could be you or myself, this year, ten years time. You would want the support from other homeowners, that is paying a morg. on a home that they trusted would be built to proper specifications, safety etc. They were under the impression that this builder was a professional honest builder, not in fact, who we all found out whom he was really in the past few months! One would assume, when purchasing a home that the people in charge and paid to do their job would do it with full honesty and to rules and regulations.

      Sadly, Priory Hall was not. There will be more places like Priory Hall that will be in the papers, where residents will be forced to leave due to unsafe building work done in the past 10 years. Watch this space. I will be there to support these families and yes, I am a tax payer. They did not ask for this stress, to be held up in rented accommodation for now, running into a 2nd year. All they want is a home, somewhere they can celebrate Christmas and their children’s lives. Just in case you didn’t know, these families are still paying morgs. for a hole that should be demolished and rebuilt by proper builders. This is DCC, Safety, architects and labourers fault. Not one welder was trained to put those railings on balconys. Have a look at the photographs.

      Reply
  • sid 08/10/12 #

    its a horrifying story , however not sure a broken state can pick up the tab.
    what we do need is to see the clowns who made.the mess pay the price ,if its the planning dept or whoever.
    bad precedent for the state to pick up the bill again as we don’t know what’s down the road.
    on saying that the families do need.justice and swiftly

    Reply
  • Another story where the taxpayer is supposed to pick up the tab. Hard luck but it isn’t the taxpayers problem.

    Reply
  • Can Paul Murphy please inform us as to the nature if any of the work he suggests the RIAI carried out at Priory Hall?

    Reply

Add New Comment