TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Public service will lose 9,000 staff in next three months – Howlin

Public expenditure minister Brendan Howlin says around 9,000 staff will take advantage of a handsome pension deal and retire.

Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MINISTER Brendan Howlin has said that the public sector will lose around 9,000 staff in the next three months.

Addressing TDs at the Public Accounts Committee, Howlin said some areas of the public sector would see major challenges as a result of the retirements, as staff opt to retire on their pre-cut levels.

Staff retiring before February will have their pensions calculated on the basis of previous, uncut salaries – with their retirement lump sum also subject to lower rates of tax than they would be after March 1.

Around 1,000 teachers are expected to take up the retirement package, though arrangements are being made for some second-level teachers to be re-employed until the end of the school year so that Leaving and Junior Cert students are not interrupted in their exam preparations.

The largest numbers are set to retire from the health services, which has already lost thousands of staff in voluntary redundancy packages in the last year.

Howlin said the relaxation of the public service recruitment moratorium – which will allow staff to be recruited in some areas where certain expertise is needed – would lead to around 3,000 new appointments.

In his Budget speech last week, Howlin said the service would lose around 6,000 staff on balance in 2012. There are currently just under 300,000 people currently employed in the sector.

The government said last month it hoped to shed a further 23,500 public sector roles by 2015.

Decentralisation scrapped and over 23,000 public sector jobs to go by 2015

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • We wont have any type of health service shortly with no staff replacements and the closure of our hospitals.With premiums rising you cant afford to get sick.

    Reply
  • Sack us all!! We’re not needed! Sorry, couldnt resist being the first to have a go at the public sector!!

    Reply
  • James, I’m not on a high horse. Problem is, its only the outrageous pension deals that SOME public servants get, that make the headlines! No public servant should be entitled to a pension, until they reach retirement age.

    Reply
  • public servants dont get pay full prsi do they? therefore they arent entitled to the same privileges and payments that other people who are full stamp paying paye-ers can avail of so in a way for the low to moderately paid ps worker it probably roughly balances out. plus they have to put up with this sh*t all over the media! problem is the public service was expanded massively by the previous government at a whim at times and now there are tons of surplus staff! the otger problem is the newer staff are young office types not the older retiring types so we still have staff where they’re not needed and we’re losing teachers and highly experienced and expert nurses and the like! doesnt make for a good set up really does it?!

    Reply
  • This are the people taking the very generous redundancy teems that we are paying for any way. Pat Spillane said it on the late late show. How good it was and he had to take it before February. So even when they are gone the tax payer will still be taking the bill for them.

    Reply
    • Great, so now we’re not entitled to a pension. This is getting better!

      Reply
    • See the problem here Paul is the type and value of the pensions have been overtly ring fenced and the age at which people can swan off and take them is another issue.

      There are many many many more people out there that have contributed vastly more into pension schemes that are now at a 50% loss ( if they are lucky)

      So get down off your horse there now. The pensions should be paid but by god there should be conditions attached to them. Including swanning off into other employment. Which happens quite frequently.

      Reply
    • @james. Why? Why should there be conditions attached? There are plenty of pension schemes out there, some have lost money, others have not. Why should someone who has paid into a pension scheme every week for 35 years be told just as they’re retiring “sorry bud, some people are looking for a scapegoat, so we’re going to have to dock your pension” Where’s the logic in that?

      Reply
    • Pat Spillane, the Milton Friedman of our times.

      Coincidentally, also a cnut.

      Reply
    • Maybe so but the pension is half of salary so it’s still a 50% saving to the taxpayer. Are we now going to begrudge a teacher or nurse a pension after 40 years of service? I’ve said it before and I’ll continue to say it.. Public service workers did not cause the economic collapse of our country so give them a break.

      Reply

Add New Comment