TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: Here’s what our leaders need to deliver in the new Dáil term

Independent TD Catherine Murphy gives her take on the challenge faced by the Government.

Catherine Murphy

IN THE MID-1990s I was fortunate enough to participate in a two-week-long initiative associated with the peace process at Harvard University. One key concept that kept cropping up again and again was that one important part of leadership is to be able to ‘deliver loss’ – essentially, to seize the opportunity out of crisis by recognising the chance for radical reform it presents.

Back then leadership was undoubtedly shown in the context of the peace process at the highest political levels by successive Irish governments; unfortunately the opposite was occurring in so many other areas of political life and economic policy.

The era of the Celebrity Taoiseach arrived, and the Teflon was provided by outsourcing governance. Instead of strengthening and reforming the institutions of the State, already fragmented and incoherent political and public service institutions became even more fragmented and incoherent; regulation was relaxed and money was often just thrown at problems. Unravelling all of this is a task of monumental proportions.

In addition to institutional reform there are a number of key challenges facing us:

  • Delivering a reduction on the debt burden, disgracefully imposed on Irish citizens, is essential. The government must be bold and ambitious about what can and should be delivered.
  • It cannot be overstated how important it is to deal with the unemployment problem. Plus the lack of bank lending particularly to small and medium business simply cannot be allowed to continue as it is where most jobs will be created.
  • Getting to grips with the burden of unsustainable mortgages and finding ways of using the 230,000 vacant properties (Census 2011) at a time when there are 100,000 individuals or families on housing waiting lists are other issues of major importance.

The Government’s “reform agenda” in respect of political institutions has to date been very superficial, while their civil/public service reform has lacked transparency and seems to be very one dimensional – a bookkeeping exercise with no overall blueprint, no vision of what will ultimately be created. The lack of transparency I believe is in no one’s interest. It sidelines the citizen from the kind of mature, balanced debate that needs to be had if the institutions are to be moulded in their interests.

Zero-sum game

Currently there are only two parties involved, with the citizen omitted entirely from the process. Many public service workers are themselves struggling to survive, yet many are going the extra mile in a system they know needs reform, a system that was not of their making. It pitches public and private sector workers against each other and creates a dangerous vacuum which is often exploited by a hostile media. It’s a zero-sum game.

Political reform must begin with our outdated local government system. I believe the reform must be radical, as proper local government has the potential to be a unit of governance that can deliver enormous returns. Unfortunately imposing new taxes and charges to fund a dysfunctional system at a time when so many are struggling to keep the roof over their heads just won’t wash.

Local government in other countries provides everything from childcare to leisure services, and people can see a return for what they pay in local taxes. If ‘leadership is all about delivering loss’, then telling people their home will be taxed because the Troika said so will be quickly seen through and will be resisted.

This Government was elected on a reform agenda. It promised that the vulnerable would be protected; they had five-point plans; a strategic investment bank; shovel-ready jobs; not another cent to the bondholders; recapitalised banks that would start lending again; and the Taoiseach’s friends in Europe would help us renegotiate the debt.

We need to begin seeing a coherent reform program that genuinely protects the most vulnerable. With projected new taxes and cuts to the tune of €3.6billion due in December’s Budget, the challenge for the Government is to demonstrate that they can ‘deliver loss’: to ensure we don’t merely end up with a poorer version of a dysfunctional State, but rather we come out the other end of this crisis with a functioning, trusted political system primed for recovery.

Catherine Murphy is an independent TD for Kildare North.

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • Best thing is to head away for about 20yrs plus until this mess is sorted out. This govt would rather leave their rich golfing buddies off the hook and target the other 99%.

    Reply
  • Great article – sums up the situation very nicely indeed!

    Reply
    • Shame there were no actual concrete ideas. It’s not enough to say something is important and must be dealt with. A little disappointing considering the start of the article referred to leadership. None in this article.

      Reply
    • Donncha,
      I think the article is excellently written, it points out quite clearly the real situation that prevails in the country today and the downright lies we were told before the election and the stagnant state of government policy .
      The article is informative in that it also says that the citizens of this country have been more or less abandoned….of which you are one too… pre election we were given concrete promises & Ideas, but they were lies, now that’s what I would call dissapointing, to say the least!!!

      Reply
    • Yes, it sums up what we know already. What we need now is action, not words.

      Reply
    • @john, so what you’re saying is that there was nothing in the article that we haven’t heard before. I don’t know Murphy too well, but I would have hoped for an idea or two instead of some ditch hurling.

      Reply
    • She says that local government should be reformed, which I agree completely with, but provides no actual ideas or suggestions on how to do this.

      I know she has done good work in the past and ranks as one of the best Technical Group TDs (see her bill proposing reform of Presidential elections) however I’d love to see ideas rather than the same kind of comments we read here on a daily basis.

      Reply
    • Anne O’Callaghan Dunlea, What is great about this article? Tons of ink has been spilled and millions of bytes have flown on this subject already and now all we get is yet another mere description which proposes nothing new. It is at best just a TDs creed; I believe in the almighty ‘deliverer of loss’, maker of heaven on earth……

      Reply
    • Yawn, gibber jabber. Some ould crap, pointing fingers and no ideas….

      Reply
  • get the builders plumbers electricians carpenters of fas to finish the houses as part of their course and sell the houses at a cheap rate.. 3 problems 1 solution

    Reply
  • Well said & well put together.Our local government ,in my opinion,needs huge reform.This is where reform should start & it needs to be radical.We should not need,nor can we afford,more than one local council,eg,Cork & Tipperary have 2 each.All of these should be merged.Smaller counties local governments should also be merged.Perhaps the number of Councillors should be looked at.We should also remember that all of our local government bodies played a huge part in the property bubble & bust.It was they who re-zoned huge tracts of land . Kerry for instance,had as much zoned building land as Belgium! It was also local government who then granted all the various planning permissions for all those lovely “ghost estates” we now have throughout the country,together with planning granted in the most unsuitable & congested areas,I.e flood plains etc.What was the upshot & result of all this blatant mis-management? Absolutely nothing.Can some one politician stand up & say enough-let’ us reform.

    Reply
  • Beautifully written ! I f only that all could be followed through ! Disgraceful what is happening ,funds taken from you by force if necessary to fund those able and unwilling to work ! problems are complex , and too many stealth taxes . As a self employed person , I am about to give up the ghost ! The amount of regulation, red tape , fees , charges and the list goes on,is totally abhorrent ! All for a debt I neither needed or asked for ! Wipe the slate clean and start all over again , yes there will be drama , managed effeciently correctly with honesty integrity in gonna be some task .cant keep propping up a system that doesn’t work !

    Reply
  • Thank you for your comments- just to address one or two of them. As an Independent TD lacking much of the resources parties get it’s sometimes difficult to have your voice heard above the political fray, so it’s understandable that some might think that members of the Opposition criticise with suggesting alternatives. For my part I’ve put out a number of proposals which you can see in the publications section of my website – http://www.catherinemurphy.ie. In the last Dáil term I focused on political & institutional reform, copyright law reform, public service reform, political funding reform, presented a Climate Change Bill and I also commissioned the independent think thank TASC to produce detailed research on a realistic economic stimulus package. Later this week I’ll be launching my proposals on Local Government reform which as I mentioned I feel is crucial. If you’ve any specific comments please feel free to contact me on catherine.murphy@oireachtas.ie

    Reply
    • Catherine the problem is that politicians have no credibility with me anymore. Every single experience I have had has involved lies, broken committments and a complete lack of ability or qualification.

      Just because someone has a good lie in waffle does not mean they should be elected to govern.

      Fitness & Probity are the current watchwords used by the Central Bank and this principle should apply to politicians who are putting themselves forward to run a country.

      I cannot think of one politician I have met. read about or listened to that fits any of these criteria.

      My faith in political resolution. and governance is non existent as we fumble from one screw up to another.

      Reply
  • Very good article. Forget the knockers, it would take 10-20 pages to be specific. Does Catherine have a blog?

    Reply
  • Unfortunately Politicians are unlikely to reform the institutions that got them elected in the first place.. With the Party Whip system hijacking democracy it is unlikely that we will see any type of reform in the near future. It would appear that our politicians view democracy as the process of getting them elected and that they then are not answerable for their actions to those that elected them. It’s sad, because democracy is something that would be worth a try !

    Reply
  • No substance. Lots of the “the government must…” Not one single alternative proposed. You do get tired of it…

    Reply
    • Complete bollox. We need a Government that cares about its citizens, not this self centred crowd, who only care about themselves and their wealthy pals. They had a great chance to make big names for themselves, but as soon as they got the chance to make the big decisions, they lost their nerve. Cowards and liars!

      Reply
    • There is nothing wrong with the ideas. They’re not new because they are all promises that FG made in their election campaign. Unfortunately, they never had any intention of delivering on them.

      Reply
    • Paul, perhaps if she came out with her own views on bank debt, Croke park, job initiatives etc rather than simply stating the obvious – gov must deal with it… Alternatives please…

      Reply
    • The alternative is that the government should start to address some of these issues as promised. Some of these issues aren’t overly complex. You are either determined to default on unsecured bank bondholders or you’re not.

      Obviously, other issues like institutional reform require debate. But this debate is not happening because government aren’t addressing the issues.

      I take your point but alternatives are for a time when the debate is taking place. That is not even happening currently. This seems like a high level article not intended to address lower level detail in particular policy areas.

      Reply
    • the “alternatives” you refer to were promised pre election……By Kenny and Gilmore, but they lied, its an alternative to this sort of corruptness that is required!!.

      Reply
    • The ANSWER was to let the banks collapse, burn the bondholders and start again, that would have been the fair, ethical and legal thing to do. But too many people at the top would end up at the bottom if that happened, so they forced the public to pay up instead.

      Reply
    • @Paul Mallon that’s what Iceland did; let the banks collapse. The money they loaned was used to shield it’s nation from the collapse (which, surprise, is in line with what a government SHOULD be doing: protecting the people).

      How did that work out? Pretty well. They have less than 6% unemployment, paid off their loans – early – and a booming economy.

      We had options O’Reilly, and even Mr Kenny promised some of those options that worked for Iceland when he campaigned. All we want is him to keep his word… and he failed at that. A man without his word is about as good as a man with no penis or testicles; essentially a no-man.

      Reply
  • I don’t mind the author highlighting what we already know as it keeps a focus. But I do agree that there are no solutions to bolster this article.

    Since time and memorial politicians have been over promising and under delivering at election time yet we allow it to continue…

    My solution?

    This country needs to be governed by “qualified” people. Proven, tried and tested performers who we should remunerated based upon clearly defined criteria that are visible to all citizens. I have no issue paying a big salary to someone or some people who can be neutral, make the tough decisions that benefit the majority citizens of this country and be completely transparent.

    Currently we have the exact opposite…but we still allow them to act in this manner.

    Reply
  • I think that window of opportunity has passed some time ago.

    Reply
  • We were driving on a freeway (Celtic tiger) when the road ended and took a bad turn (bank bail out) down a a narrow bog road. That road has ended and we have no choice but to take apart the car and carry it bit by bit across the bog to get to a new single carriage way. It really doesnt matter who takes charge as we all know the new road is over there. Carrying the car, people are going to get hurt and left behind but for this never to happen again those that survive this journey must put signs and roadblocks for future generations.

    Reply
    • At least we have plenty of bridge builders if we need them…

      Reply
    • Complete rubbish…that’s two minutes of my life I will never get back.

      Reply
    • Here’s an easier way. Instead of continuing down the bog, turn around, and take the left turn instead of the bad one. Shoot any aligators (imprison the bankers and gamblers that let it happen, blow up any trees in the way (let the failing banks fall), and get the hell out of the sinkholes.

      Easy? It’s what these apes in charge promised to do. Yet we’re about to hand over another BILLION to unsecured bondholders who took risks of their own accord, to their own greed.

      Reply
  • Establishing the principle of subsidiarity is the essential reform needed for Irish Local Government. To be effective this needs a news provision in the constitution. This and four other essential reforms are referenced at http://www.mylestierney.com .

    Reply

Add New Comment