TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Column: ‘Free preschool has to be backed by strong political will’

Education and care go hand in hand, argues Irene Gunning, and the care of toddlers and preschoolers can’t be separated as two different processes.

Irene Gunning

THE SUSTAINABILITY OF the free preschool scheme was high on the agenda for the 250 delegates attending our conference “Leading the Way in Early Childhood Care & Education” in the RDS over the weekend.

As the representative group for 80 per cent of preschools, daycare, parent & toddler and after school services, we are calling for an additional €5 million budget to maintain the free preschool scheme to deal with Ireland’s baby boom.  While our members were somewhat reassured by the Minister for Children’s comments that the free preschool year is here to stay, this has got to be backed up by strong political will to keep this scheme free and universal.

Referred to as the ECCE (Early Childhood Care & Education) scheme, this is I believe the best single policy measure ever and it has saved the childcare sector from buckling under, but finances are still too tight for many.  The way the ECCE scheme works is that the government are the buyers and control the price as they put the money into the services and parents put their children into the services.  However, there’s only so much downward pressure that can be applied to the capitation rate, without putting people out of business.  I would invite politicians to have a go at balancing the books of their local preschool for just one week, to get  a true sense of the challenges being faced every day by those working in the sector.

“If we are to follow that utopian childcare model in Scandinavia… we have to invest in the sector to get there”

Through the scheme, we’ve embraced more young children from disadvantaged backgrounds into preschool, something they wouldn’t perhaps have experienced without the ECCE scheme. We want to repeat our call to expand the scheme to 2 years, as Ireland plays catch up with our European partners who have way more State investment in both preschool and after school services.  We must also address the needs of children with special needs who also have a right to attend preschool.  If we are to follow that utopian childcare model in Scandinavian countries that Minister Joan Burton refers to, we have got to invest in the sector to get there.

And speaking of Minister Burton, the escalating debate around childcare for lone parents in light of proposed social welfare changes was considered by our 250 delegates who came from after school services nationwide, as well as preschool and daycare.  We were reminded by those delegates that we already have the blueprint for the free preschool scheme, a scheme that was fast-tracked by this sector as we demonstrated great flexibility in implementing this scheme over the past 2 years.  This blueprint will be the starting point for joint discussions with Ministers Burton and Fitzgerald regarding their action plan to support lone parents with the best quality childcare.

We will also use our meeting with Minister Burton to once again warn her about proposed legislation whereby employers would be made responsible for the first four weeks of an employee’s sick leave.  If implemented, this would devastate the sector because of the ratio regulations and many providers would simply have to close their doors as they couldn’t afford that double whammy in terms of cost.

The recent €60 million in applications from the childcare sector for capital grants from a €6 million fund was also discussed, and this is a sign of the times and indicative of the needs for building improvements in the sector.  Responding to this and expanding the fund will have real benefits to childcare providers, the construction industry and the children.

“There are inconsistencies around whether childcare facilities qualify as ‘education facilities’ which are exempt from rates”

Another bugbear for our members that raised its head at the conference is the issue of commercial rates and the inconsistencies around the country about whether childcare facilities qualify as ‘education facilities’ which are exempt from rates.  This is an issue that both Minister Fitzgerald and Minister Hogan are well aware of and we need a solution fast before more people go out of business, the last straw being their big rates bills.

We have argued with both Ministers that the care and education of toddlers and preschoolers can’t be separated out as two different processes, something that is actually reflected through the merger of the inspection process between the Department of Health and the Department of Education, which makes absolute sense.  Education and care go hand in hand and the bottom line is that more childcare services should qualify as education facilities and therefore be exempt from rates automatically.

It was heart-warming to hear keynote speaker Dr Anne Looney, CEO of NCCA (National Council for Curriculum & Assessment) acknowledge the leading role that early education and care plays in modern day Ireland.  What a champion for the early years sector Anne is.  I totally agree with her observation that the most important influence in education is not the policy, or the curriculum, or the building, all important elements in their own right.

Rather it is the quality of the adult that interacts with the child and it’s not just how well they know their stuff that matters. It is what they believe that really counts. Do they believe that every child can learn and has the potential to succeed?  We’ve got recognise the quality people working in the early years sector and invest in them through continuous professional development and training.

We welcome the Minister for Children’s announcement of a new Expert Group to advise on Ireland’s first Early Year’s Strategy, and I look forward to playing my part on that group.   Childcare is a critical issue that must be higher on the government agenda and linked directly to jobs.

To put it in context, the early childhood care and education sector generates almost €320 million in salaries, with a further €105 million spent in the wider economy and employs 22,000 qualified professionals.

Every effort must be made to that services remain open and viable, so that they can support children and enable parents to participate in the workforce.

Irene Gunning is CEO at Early Childhood Ireland.

Read next:

Comments (19 Comments)

  • TNR 28/04/12 #

    DubInNass, ur comment is disgraceful, arrogant and shortsighted. I work hard both in the home and outside of it as many other mothers do. I’m not farming my children out, that’s an outrageous statement to make. I pay my taxes and my children are entitled to a free preschool year which will allow them to socialise and interact with other children their age. This is an important part of a child’s development and is an excellent introduction into primary education. Added to that I firmly believe that as a working mother I am a good role model for my children. I work hard to make a better life for my children so how dare you accuse me and others like me of farming my children out. I am no less of a mother than you because I’m not in the home all day. You annoy me!

    Reply
  • The family is constitutionally protected. Its a shame that constitutional protection is not remembered by those who draft our tax laws. Far better for our society if we had tax incentives to encourage one parent to stay at home and raise their own children. Parents will always do a better job of raising their children than the state or a state-funded care facility.

    Reply
    • P Wurple 27/04/12 #

      You can thank Charlie McGreevy FF for that one. Tax individualisation in 1999 wiped out parents financial ability to stay at home with their children.

      Reply
    • Ok guys let me tell you a true story about this country and its madness ( I agree with the free preschool year its only 60 euro per child per week for one year). A couple I know she is stay at home mom (3 kids), he was made redundant and is on job seekers allowance. Ok so far, now she decided to do a one year course on child care, he could mind the kids, its only 4 days a week, hes not working. Wrong, because she was doing course and he is on benefits their three children attended a creche from 8 till 6 5 days a week for FREE. The government pays the fee. So he is at home, she is also home from course two days a week but their 3 children attend free creche.
      THe cost of this is 450 euros a week. Now the course is finished, but she was told that there is another follow on course for two EVENINGS a week, if she does it her kids can stay in creche again paid for by the government. This is not a fairytale, so add up the amount of people who are availing of this and see the cost of this to the taxpayer, dont be worrying about a 60 euro a week payment, worry about the 450 a week payment.

      Reply
  • Am I the only one who thinks these universal schemes have got to be abolished NOW? Never mind where the funding is supposed to come from, it’s very simple…those who can afford to pay, should. Are we that naive to think this country is completely devoid of wealthy people? Universal schemes mean less money available to those who genuinely need it.

    Reply
    • Following that train of thought, should we abolish “free” primary and secondary school for those who can afford it too? Our children should be entitled to an education regardless of whether their parents have money or not, and that definately should include the first year of pre-school.

      Reply
    • Louise, the logic behind these universal schemes baffles me. Irish taxpayers providing financial support to the D.O’Briens and M.O’Learys of this country (child allowance?!). If we means tested to exclude the very wealthy, wouldn’t it mean the system was more equitable? More universal schemes = more taxes.

      Reply
    • Whilst I agree somewhat with your sentiment, I do think children’s education should be omitted from the debate of rich/poor social devision. Education is supposed to be available to every child no matter the circumstances. Children’s Allowance should be means tested yes, but not children’s education.

      Reply
    • I don’t think it should be abolished, that wouldn’t be fair on people who can’t afford it but maybe means test it in some way so that the people who can afford pay their share

      Reply
    • Hey Simone, maybe I’m mistaken but aren’t universal schemes by their very definition NOT means tested? I think we’re saying the same thing. Those who are rich enough should pay their share. I’ve heard Michael O’Leary (worth approx €140 mill) talking about how farcical universal schemes are e.g., his entitlement to claim children’s allowance etc. Doesn’t that seem wrong?!!!!

      Reply
  • Oh great. More ‘Free’ stuff. I hate that word. Nothing is Free. This just means someone else will pay.

    Reply
  • Good to see Ms Gunning and her organisation actively putting their ideas and proposals to Ministers, rather than merely criticising everything done by Government and offering no alternatives. The introduction of the ECCE by Brian Lenihan was long overdue, given all the coverage of childcare costs during the good years.

    Reply
  • I’m not a great fan of some of the expectations in the formal education system either, TNR. A lot of children enjoy preschool, but interaction with peers isn’t confined to the preschool setting. I have a 5 yr old who didn’t avail of the free year and you couldn’t meet a more sociable child. At a young age, the best social tutors are loving sensitive parents who are better able to react to their child’s needs and guide them through their early social interactions. Children will meet other children anyway-it doesn’t have to be in a particular setting for a set time every day. It just seems like a bit of a luxury when so many vital services are being cut back or removed. If parents really want to send their children, they should pay. Of course, there should be free access for those who are struggling and would find it impossible to provide the skills and experiences that preschool can provide, but, as I suggested, this should be targeted to those who are really in need.

    Reply
  • It’s a bit of a fallacy that children have to attend preschool to learn how to interact and socialise. I think the benefits of preschool are more marked in those children that are disadvantaged and these are the groups that should be targeted. Let’s face it, people who are on fairly good salaries are well able to afford the books, crafts, trips and other facilities that help to expand a child’s horizons. In an time when some families can hardly afford to put food on the table, I think it’s a luxury to provide free preschool to those who are more than capable of paying for themselves. I also wonder about the so-called utopian model in Sweden. Most babies are in full time day care by the time they are 18 months old. This, despite it being better, if at all possible, for children to avoid full time day care until they are 3 yrs old. There seems to be huge pressure on women to get back to work and there seems to be a pressure to conform to the status quo. Not a model I’d like to see here in Ireland where many mothers or fathers choose to care for their children on a full time or part time basis.

    Reply
  • Free re-school and care of toddlers does exist.
    Its called staying at home and raising your children, instead of farming them out to an orphanage every day.

    Of course that notion just isn’t considered seriously anymore, because of the way society has gone.

    I had hoped that post the ‘celtic chernobyl’ we would have reviewed the way Irish society was organised

    Reply
    • For the year before school I think that every child should be able to go to preschool. It’s a good way of introducing them to a classroom environment. Before that I think you should pay. I’m lucky in the way that we can afford for me to be a stay at home mom,or at least,I wouldn’t earn enough to make it worthwhile doing it any other way and this suits us.

      Reply
    • I’m lucky enough that I can afford to stay home with my son, but a lot of people cant afford to and don’t have other available family members for the job, farming them out to an orphanage is a really insulting way of putting it when people dont have a choice.

      Reply
    • Well said it’s way gone beyond a joke that one wage cannot sustain a family and their needs.
      It was the biggest coup ever for greedy billionaires to force childbearing women to remain their slaves and neglect their most important role Motherhood .

      Reply
  • TNR 30/04/12 #

    Hi Maria,
    Firstly I didn’t say that children need to attend preschool to learn how to interact and socialise, however I do feel it is necessary for children to interact with their own age group to improve their social skills. Despite being able to provide art and craft and what ever else at home I don’t feel this is itself prepares a child properly for primary school. Many primary teachers will tell you that it’s easy identify the children who have attended preschool and those who have not. I have no problem with anybody who decides not to avail of preschool however for someone to suggest it’s farming your children out is ridiculous. What a great introduction into the formal education system.

    Reply

Add New Comment