TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: Renting is the future – and not just for houses

As the property crash continues to bite, people are avoiding big commitments to their homes, cars and even relationships, writes Gerard O’Neill.

Gerard O'Neill Gerard O'Neill is a business man, author, part-time economist and a director of a market research agency in Ireland (Amárach Research).

I’VE BEEN STRUCK recently by the similarities between the Irish consumer and the American consumer.

Both went on a borrowing binge fuelled by cheap credit. Both poured unprecedented amounts of money into property thereby fuelling a massive bubble. Both are now struggling to undo the damage by paying off debts and avoiding additional borrowings. Surveying the US consumer landscape, the Blackrock Investment Institute has observed that:

In the past expansion, consumer spending growth was able to outpace income growth because of the wealth effect created by the housing boom [...] In our view, however, the era of abundant consumer credit has ended, at least for the time being. In future years, it is more likely that secular tightening in consumer credit markets will force US consumers to keep consumption growth roughly in line with income growth and to slowly reduce their current level of leverage.

The same, alas, applies to Ireland. The big de-leveraging has still some way to go. Irish consumers know this of course. The fundamental psychological driver is risk. People consider it too risky to buy house, change their car, or even to take a holiday. But life goes on, and people want to live a little. That is why consumers in America and Ireland are increasingly attracted to options that allow them to de-risk the future. And the best way of de-risking a purchase decision? Don’t buy, rent.

I’ve suggested before that we will be renting the future. I was thinking mostly about tenure. But now it looks like renting is becoming the new buying across a wider range of consumer markets. For example, US home furnishings store Best Buy have set up ‘Rent-a-Centers‘ where consumers can rent furniture etc, and return the items if they no longer wish to keep them.

Sure it’s a variation on hire purchase, but such innovations are now much easier and cheaper to operate (for sellers and buyers) thanks to communications technologies. One fascinating example of the impact of technology is Airbnb. This turns consumers into landlords: so you can rent a spare bed (or air bed – hence the name) for one or more nights, generating extra income when you need it. Two million bed nights later it looks like there’s a demand for it. Ireland’s B&B industry could be transformed (or obliterated – depending on how it plays out) by such innovations.

These are examples of the new reality: buying is the new ‘wasted money’. Renting is the least risky way to get hold of the things (furniture, cars, accommodation) that people still need. There is a new generation growing up in Ireland most of whom will never know job security, will never see property as a sure thing, and who will avoid those life decisions that are ‘irreversible’ and therefore risky for as long as possible. Sadly including getting married and having children.

Just like their American counterparts.

Gerard O’Neill is a businessman, author, part-time economist and a director of market research agency Amárach Research. He writes at Turbulence Ahead, where this article first appeared.

About the author:

Gerard O'Neill  / Gerard O'Neill is a business man, author, part-time economist and a director of a market research agency in Ireland (Amárach Research).

Read next:

Comments (32 Comments)

  • Aydo 15/09/11 #

    The first 2 comments show how the Irish mentality of ownership, stemming from the time of English rule, will be hard to break.

    How anyone can think taking out a loan that will take virtually a life time to repay is a good idea is beyond me.

    Most people end up just handing that property to their kids anyway. You only get one life, why pour it into one patch of brick and mortar.
    You can make anywhere a home. I’ve rented for 6 years now. Never looked back. Most people I know are now 50% in negative equity which may or may not come back over their whole lives.

    Renting is SO flexible. If you change job you rent closer to the job, if your pay goes down you rent a less expensive property, if your pay increases you can upgrade, never being tied to one property, always able to live where’s suitable at a given time. No brainer to me. Costs are similar too.

    Reply
    • The English and her fascination with land ownership…the only place in Europe that has this attitude (and of course Ireland).

      The situation is so bad in England that they barely have any countryside left because of wannabe landbarons.

      Reply
    • I could not have said it better myself. I really don’t see any sense in owning a property, unless you plan on farming the land.

      Reply
    • The bubble made a lot of us overpay for our homes and distorted our view of things

      In a “normal” market the cost of renting should be marginally higher than buying, because landlords must make a profit on their investment. I say “marginally” because should demand and supply match (again, a theoretical case) then competition would keep rent and house prices very near.

      In the end it depends on our individual priorities – young, unattached people will probably prefer the freedom of renting – no investment risk, no being tied down to a property you might want to leave. But if you have children, by buying a house you are going to increase the family’s assets and pass them on to future generations – even if it takes your entire lifetime to pay it off.

      Reply
  • I’m not sure we are growing up with a generation who will never have our obsession with property.

    "the one thing we learn from history is that we don’t learn from history" Warren Buffet

    Reply
  • made 15/09/11 #

    Too right, I have a mortgage at the moment albeit not as bad as some people but as soon as I can sell I will and I’ll never touch another mortgage again.

    Reply
  • Maybe there is another option, what about shared or fractional ownership? Instead of purchasing ‘all’ of the expensive asset, you can purchase just a portion. Equally, if you have purchased a property during the boom times and now find that repayments are becoming a little steep, share the burden. One such example of this can be seen on http://www.sharespark.com where one Irish investor has decided to lighten the load by offering other investors the opportunity to acquire 50% of his investment property. Ok, so he now doesn’t own his property outright, but at least his monthly repayments are towards an asset that he will ultimatley own 50% of in time.

    I recall hearing of an Irish builder who — in desparation to try and shift his newly built properties — offered to rent them to prospective buyers who could then elect to purchase them at any time less the rent that they had put into the property! I am sure there was lots of T&C’s and fine print to boot, but maybe there is a clever idea in there that would be a middle ground between renting forever and having nothing at the end of it versus upfront outright purchase?

    Reply
    • Great post! You hit the nail on the head – there are more potential models than the two we have at the moment (well 4 really).

      Part of the problem is that so many people are stuck in the buy/rent mindset is because they have no other options. Or sometimes really only one option. The rent to buy schemes are a good idea but need careful regulation so people don’t lose money. Its a good idea though – also part ownership and communal ownership schemes are good ideas. But I do think rents need to be forced down, if you look at CSO, the average rent is 800 a month but the average wage is about 34k – that means that a person on the average wage would be paying well more than 30% of his/her wage on rent, that is a high risk scenario.

      And anybody who thinks you can just walk away from renting nowadays is wrong: it used to be the case before PRTB came in, back in the days of periodic tenancies. Now most landlords more or less force tenants to sign leases to lock them into the 1 year lease. Look at the accommodation section of boards.ie and you’ll see it flooded with concerned tenants who need to break a lease but are being pursued by landlords for the difference in rent or having their deposits withheld because of it. Renting is pretty grim in Ireland, unless you have a lot of money to spare.

      Reply
  • Surprised at this. If you are blessed to still have your parents ask them if they struggled financially for years when they bought their first home? Most likely they did. When I was younger I lived and rented all over Ireland and lived for years in America and Australia. Their comes a time when a desire develops to settle down and buy a HOME! This I did and while I might have overpaid the future is not bleaker but ultimately brighter for it. At the very least I will have some sort of legacy of my life work and and an inheritance for my children and grandchildren. Owning and paying for a home is something to be proud of.

    Reply
  • If Someone in their 30′s rents now and never gets a mortgage, lives to 80′s or 90′s will they still want to be renting at that age? With a mortgage you have some hope of eventually owning your home in possibly your 50′s or 60′s

    Reply
    • You are too right. Another thing you don’t realise is you can’t really share a house once you hit your 40s: its just not the done thing, you don’t really want to be 10 years older than everybody else in the house. So you are forced to pay the full whack for a whole unit – meaning you either end up in a shabby bedsit or else paying top dollar for a 1 bed unit. Which in Ireland is still very, very expensive relative to buying the same place.

      Recently, I had a look at the rents going in the Dublin city council fire sale properties – the places were selling for around 125 to 150k which is a mortgage of around 600-800 a month – but rents in the same place were 1000 a month! And the buyers may still have got interest relief (it was before that was phased out!) so essentially tenants were paying 25% over an above to start with – which means in 10 years time they could be paying a huge amount more.

      Reply
    • Laura, all your calculations are far too optimistic.

      If you buy a 150K house you have to have about €20,000 deposit. Then you have to pay €700/month over 20 years. If you rent and put €20K in a deposit account it will grow, very roughly doubling every 10 years.

      You haven’t taken into account the very strong possibility that interest rates will rise. You’ve left out all the stamp duty, estate agents fees, solicitors fees, decoration (to make it less tatty), furniture, repairs and ongoing repairs, house insurance etc etc. All these costs are missing from renting.

      What is the value on the loss of flexibility? What would insurance cost per month to protect you from a reduction in the value of your house? You have ignored that the principal is almost untouched for 10 years. The initial payments are almost all interest. If you decide to emigrate, you’ll still owe 90% that principal.

      Reply
  • Darren 15/09/11 #

    I’ve never understood this argument. I see renting is less risky and more flexible but over the lifetime of a service it will cost significantly more. Clearly it has a place when you are young. Even if house rent dropped to 50% of the monthly cost of buying a house you still would pay more over the time you need a house. ???

    Reply
    • Darren. Where do you get your figures? A house bought for say half a million, when repaid costs 1.5 million. Every time you change house you pay stamp duty, solicitors fees, estate agents fees. Up to recently it would been €40,000 on such a house. You are far less flexible if you own a home. It’s much more difficult and expensive to move. You have to pay for the maintenance and insurance on your own home. You can’t easily change, upsize or downsize, when family circumstances change. My old mum lives in a four bed-roomed house on her own. You can’t say, “I think I’ll live in France for a year” without enormous costs. The notion of being wedded to a house strikes me as absurd and is mainly caused by cultural & historical reasons in Ireland. It’s not logical. Maybe the exception is to buy a flat near the sea when you want to retire and are done roaming.

      Reply
    • I rent and I’m in my mid-thirties, wouldn’t touch a mortgage with yours! As soon as I can I will be emigrating. I give a months notice and clear my crap out. Case closed. Love the freedom. My flat is nicer than most people’s houses and certainly bigger with a huge private garden but best thing of all my rent is much lower than most mortgages taken out in past 10 years

      Reply
    • Correct, the problem in Ireland with renting almost anything is that unless you pay considerably more than you would to buy the original product, you end up with something shabby, substandard and worn out. Renting property reminds me of the old days of renting a TV – you always ended up with a model from about 10 years ago, totally battered and probably far cheaper to buy.

      If anybody wants figures, here is one. I paid more than 50,000 euros to rent from 2001 to today. That includes 3 years of very modest “rents” paid to family or shared with an ex partner. Most of the places I rented were pretty tatty, but still very expensive. I still know of people in Dublin who pay 625 a month to SHARE an apartment.

      Its all very nice thinking of renting but until the cost falls to the kind of levels that most peoples incomes are at, there will be a marked desire to buy and take control of the long term costs.

      Reply
    • Laura, some of your points have merit but the “tatty” comments are partly to do with the lack of a rental market caused by most middle class people buying. That has changed. It takes a similar amount of effort to find a good rent as to buy. My experience is mixed. I have rented and owned.

      Unless you have the cash in hand, buying is a gamble that most people on a fixed salary should not take unless they can buy very cheaply, as now. It’s not just negative equity, do you remember 18% interest rates? My experiences have been far more positive than yours.

      You say since 2001 you have spent €50K. What’s your debt/negative equity situation vis a vis all those people who are technically bankrupt? How much stamp duty, solicitors fees and estate agents fees did you save? In 10 years you would have paid well over €100,000 in interest payments alone on a €300K mortgage.

      Reply
    • William – your figures don’t add up. What magicians hat did you get the 20k savings out of?

      Look at this. 50k over 10 years is a lot of money for somebody whose gross earnings for most of that period was around 26-30k a year – the equivalent of 2 years entire pretax earnings or 20%. Bear in mind the total tax relief for the entire period was only 2400 in total.

      Starting in 2001, it was still possible to buy a small house in my home town for 130k. Lets say I had a 100% mortgage for 30 years with an average interest rate of 6% (just to allow for future interest rises averaged out over 30 years – considering in mind interest rates have been lower since 2001) – the monthly repayment is 780 euros per month and I will finally be loan free in 2031.

      But the other scenario is the rental scenario. Lets say my rent started at 600 euros per month in 2001 (actually less than many were at the time, even outside of Dublin). And allow an averaged annual increase of 2% – actually less than the real rate of rise but this is an exercise. Using compound interest, by the end of 2031 I would have paid 292,090 euros in rent. But it doesn’t stop there. At an annual rise of 2%, my rent in 2031 – at a conversation estimate – would now be 1087 per month – and I would still have to pay it and any future rises.

      In the buying scenario, I would now be rent/mortgage free, albeit still with the costs of living.

      By the way, the total cost of the mortgage for the buy scenario is 280800 (780*12*30) so the imaginary 20k you pulled out of a hat in 2001 would have already been eaten to pay the rent AND now I would be facing yet more rent. In fact looking at the additional rent over a 10 year period I would be looking at more than 12k per year for the following 10 years – very distressing for the pensioner of the future with very very modest pension savings.

      Why do you all assume that tenants have huge savings amassed? Most of the reason people rent in the first place is because they cannot afford to buy!

      Reply
    • You picked 2001 as a starting point. Do your sums again but start in 2005. That’s like saying if you backed the winner of 2:30 race yesterday you would have won.

      The 20K I was referring to is needed to get a mortgage. You don’t need to save 20K if you rent. That was my point.

      If you did rent AND saved 20K, it would turn into about 60K to 80K after 30 years and that’s just on deposit.

      Where in your calculations do you include all the agents and solicitors fees, stamp duty, insurance, repair etc… Calculate again and take into account say moving 3 times as most people do.

      Reply
  • People still ignore the little fact that even if your mortgage has time to run when it ends you either have (a) no more payments an therefore live rent free (b) a serious asset to sell (c) even if there is negative equity you will be in a better place at the end of the mortgage than when you started….. Renting will never be financially viable on a long term in this country cause all the rights go to the tenant leaving the landlord exposed so who the hell is going to be a landlord ?

    Reply
  • there is a Guy in my work who has informed us the mortgage payers that we would better off renting Every single day for the past year, he is also of the mind dumping the girlfriend because it would save him a few euro traveling back and forth to her house… myself and the other mortgage payers in work may be poor but we are rich in love.

    Reply
  • your house is a valuable asset to be sold to fund your retirement in the sun ! renting is paying somebody else’s mortgage !!!!

    Reply
  • social housing is the way forward , affordable rents allowing for quality of life.

    Reply
  • Fools buy, clever people rent.

    Reply
  • Aydo 15/09/11 #

    Was just supposed to reply in general not to a particular comment, my mistake

    Reply

Add New Comment