TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Column: Taking kids to beauty salons? It’s far from child’s play

From junior manicures to baby clothes reading “I’m too sexy” – this sexualisation of children isn’t just a bit of fun, writes Joanna Fortune.

Joanna Fortune

MEMBERS OF RETAIL Ireland (and some who are not members) have signed up to a code of conduct that they will not stock sexualised clothing for children. It reminds me of the situation in May when Vogue magazine launched their ‘Health Initiative’, hot on the heels of criticism after they had photographed children as young as seven dressed to look like adults in the magazine. Vogue said they would not “knowingly use models who were under 16 years of age or who appeared to have an eating disorder”.

While I welcome the safeguarding of children and childhood in these initiatives, I resent the publicity and clap on the back expected for such things. It is quite shocking that special codes of conduct and health initiatives are required to ensure that retailers and magazines do not exploit and sexualise children.

It is also regrettable that the code of conduct only covers clothing in the stores who have signed up. There is an entire industry dedicated to premature sexualisation of children. There was much media frenzy about a beauty salon in Essex, England that is specifically for the under-13 market. But there are online clothing stores selling similar items including make-up for children – even t-shirts for babies and children bearing slogans such as “I’m too sexy for this shirt” and “All daddy wanted was a blow job”. (Yes, that’s real, I saw it myself).

There are salons in Ireland offering Princess Pamper Parties for small children including manicures, pedicures and makeovers with soft drink “champagne” cocktails. This isn’t about being prudish or saying this is morally reprehensible. I see it as being far more serious than this, it is an issue with far-reaching consequences.

‘Just child’s play’

We are facing a generation of preschoolers who are preoccupied and anxious about body image, how they look and what brands they are seen wearing. By tolerating this premature adultification of our children, we are ensuring that their development is short-circuited, shooting them from childhood straight into adulthood, skipping normal developmental stages. Which is detrimental for children. How did we allow this to happen!?

I’m going to be very clear on my position on this. I do not approve of bringing young children to a beauty salon to have manicures, pedicures, facials, spray tans or any other beauty treatment. (For an extra cost, one salon will also provide your child with a photographer to follow them around – so is fame now also an entitlement that is closely aligned with beauty, and nothing to do with achievement?)

I’ve heard both sides of the argument: how it’s just child’s play, and children play Mummies and Daddies and other adult roles involving hair and make-up all the time, and that it is good for them.  Yes, this is true – and this is good for them. However, a child playing the roles they see their parents in – and using their imaginations to enact the experience as they see and understand it – is quite separate to the experience of being brought to a salon where a professional is attending to their grooming as though they actually were adults. This is not a subtle difference, this is a screamingly obvious difference.

‘Yes to dressing up in mum’s high heels’

Children are growing up in an increasingly image-obsessed society where the onus is on how you look, as opposed to what you do.  Parents should be focused on empowering their children to feel beautiful from the inside and to behave and act in a beautiful way towards themselves and others. This is enough ‘beauty’ for any child to be concerned with. Beauty salons are an adult experience, and we should not tolerate attempts to force our children to lose their already too short and too precious childhoods.

I have witnessed first-hand how little girls and boys are fascinated with watching their mothers engage in their beauty regime, apply make-up, paint their nails. This should not be confused with a fascination with beauty and make-up alone. This is a child’s fascination with watching their mothers and idealising their mother’s routines. This fascination is as much about the child’s preoccupation with their mum as it is about any preoccupation with make-up.

To introduce your child to a salon of this kind at such a young age is to expose and immerse them in an adult world at a premature stage, it takes away the creativity and imagination that is fundamental to this kind of roleplay; and roleplay is an essential stage of any child’s developmental experience.

All children, not just little girls, need to engage in fantasy and roleplay. They must be allowed to use their imaginations to express how they are experiencing their world and the people in their world; this is fundamental to their growth and development.

So, it’s a yes to dressing up in mum’s high heels and dressing gown while roleplaying, and it is a very big NO to eliminating imagination and having your child experience life as an adult prematurely. Parents must trust their own instincts on this – and not allow the normalisation of such practices in society to make us feel like prudes when we tell our children that they are too young for a manicure.

Joanna Fortune is a clinical psychotherapist and the director of the Solamh Parent-Child Relationship Clinic in Dublin. You can find out more at solamh.com.

Read: Penneys, M&S, Tesco and more sign up to code on children’s clothes>

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • I completely agree. I cannot understand why these companies are getting any credit for this. Any buyer who purchases sexualised clothes for children should be sacked. As a mother of a developing 11 year old I find it increasingly difficult to find age appropriate clothes. I have been told by M&S that padded bras are ‘better for girls’ and ‘sure they all wear them’. A huge anount of responsibility must be taken by the mothers who buy these items. It has to stop.
    As for beauty salons again I agree. As I work in this industry I have seen mothers try to push young girls into waxing etc. I have not done this but have been asked. Little girls want to live in this world in their imagination not in real life. As a bridal makeup artist I often have flower girls who want makeup. I use my ‘princess makeup’, sweep a clean brush over them and add a tiny bit of sparkle strawberry gloss on their lips and show them the ‘princess mirror’. They dont have anything on but they believe they do.
    Let their imaginations run wild, don’t ruin it with reality that they clearly are not ready for.

    Reply
    • Very well said Deborah. We only have 1 Childhood so let’s cherish it ands Stop making little girls into little looking (cheap) like little women We can not give them back their innocence once it has gone and as for cheap cute over aged shoes our little girls will not thank mum when She is all grown up and has developed problems with her hips/back because of bad shoes

      Reply
    • Excellent comments. Talke heed.

      Reply
  • Young girls have been ‘pressured’ into looking beautiful for decades through the fashion show that is their first communion… If we can start with an examination of this it would be a positive step in the right direction

    Reply
  • Do we really need the retail outlets to teach us how to bring up our children in a safe and self-respecting manner?

    I fear some mothers (fathers usually have no involvement) treat their children as some sort of ‘show-off’ playthings to make up for deficiencies in their own personalities or self-esteem.

    Why else would a mother expose their child to the evil of sexualisation at a tender age- to the delight of the predatory paedophiles that rejoice in this inane behaviour. Sadly, they have unlimited opportunities – even at church ceremonies.

    Many of the ‘children’s-discos’ are an abomination, nothing less.

    Just ask yourself, ‘ who is leering at my innocent child?’ And ask yourself ‘Am I the cause of it.’

    Reply
  • I hope a happy side effect of the recession will be the easing of social pressure on older women to spend half their lives in self beautification, not just children. This is what is being transferred to the next generation. I know a few people who’s calendars of full of this junk. Pedicures, day at the spa, shellac, hair coloured, hair styled, waxing, face muds, tanning, hamster-like on the treadmill, eyebrows tinted, fake eyelashes, ad nauseum. The whole thing is so ridiculously time consuming. It is hours on end, and an absolute fortune spent on it each week. I would be very ashamed of myself if I was condeming my daughter to that kind of meaningless lifestyle. Clean and healthy is much more attractive than any of that fake stuff.

    Reply
    • That I agree with, less is more, women with too much make up are a complete turn off, au natural all the way

      Reply
    • if an “older woman” wants to spend a fortune trying to look younger, who gives a hoot. we are talking here about “younger women” who are dressing their young daughters in clothes that is totally innappropriate and sexualising them, young women who you would not recognise on a night out with their fake tans, fake boobs , fake eyelashes, fake fingernails and fake hair. And they are the ones bringing up the children of today, what hope do these children??

      Reply
    • And after all that, the end result is that they look like clowns. Just curious, when you say older, how old are we talking about – the women you know, that is.

      Reply
    • Seriously, offense to the word ‘older’? Older than the children in the article is what I meant. Old enough to be a mother and young enough to still be an influence. so, my age. 20′s, 30′s and 40′s.

      Reply
    • False hair colour, make-up, fake eye-lashes, fake tan………………..all a complete turn-off for me and most of the guys I know. Not it really matters to me, I married to woman that never bothered with anything but the minimum amount of that crap. Hopefully, my daughters will be the exact same. There is nothing more attractive then a woman in her natural beauty.

      Reply
    • …and I still don’t understand why thejournal is THE only forum (I am registered with) where I cannot edit my posts

      Reply
  • Thank God for someone with some sense. Agree with everything you say except I live abroad where women wear comfortable shoes – no health hazzard heals required – so none to try on. i don’t wear makeup in front of my kids (or its no natural, they would hardly notice it), I do that in the evening when I have a babysitter. I don’t agree that young girls need to dress up with heels and makeup.

    It’s this Irish obsession, and it looks ridiculous to everyone else. They are beautiful naturally – that’s the message I want to pass on. In fact, I try to not even put any emphasis at all on beauty.

    Reply
    • 100 percent spot on, it is the mothers who are sexualising their young daughters. These clothes would not be for sale unless there was a demand for them. As for the women themselves and their makeup, I went out one night with a few from work and I hardly recognised them with their fake tan, fake boobs, fake eyelashes and fake hair. Some fellas must get some shock in the morning.

      Reply
  • Retailers and brand names will market anything that they can in order to make a profit. common sense, morals, and other things that are considered the fabric of society tend to take a back door to profiteering the majority of the time unless there is a public backlash against a particular item that gets media attention.

    As for parents, no matter which is to blame, there’s a lengthy list of things that most parents should be doing in upbringing their children (a list that’s been growing with each successive generation) for the last 50 years. whether it’s how to deal with social issues such as bullying, how they look, not being able to afford those expensive shoes or name brand fashions, to more mundane things such as not simply parking them in front of the tv to watch cartoons on a 24/7 network at a young age to get them out of your hair for as long as possible during the day, and so forth.

    There’s only so much you can do about social pressures from friend, at school, and from a commercial world that not only seems geared towards enticing the young into impulse buying (or begging, pleading, temper tantrum throwing until the caregiver caves in and gets them what they want), they honestly actually do market research into just how they can improve such enticements above and beyond what they do now. But it starts at home, with how the parents are (kids tend to watch, listen and observe what their caregivers do themselves and act accordingly in mimicking such behaviours), and with what children are allowed, or not allowed to do on a whim.

    let kids be kids, but sometimes, the adults actually have to be parents.

    Reply
  • Glad I’m not the only one getting innocuous comments removed, happening a lot lately!

    Reply
  • very strange my comment has been deleted but it comes up on my other feed…?

    Reply
  • Let’s get the facts straight here…… This is about he early sexualisation of GIRLS by their MOTHERS so enough of the PC bullshxt…

    Also the baby “blowjob” t-shirt is nothing to do with the “sexualisation of children” it’s a joke and quite a funny one too so please get a sense of humour and put that particular straw man to bed while you’re at it.

    Reply
    • I absolutely agree with you, Gavin. Unfortunately, it is the mothers who are to blame. However Pennys etc shoild not stock the merchandise. BJ tshirt? That is just sick!

      Reply
    • Yeah it’s all fun and games Gavin until Mummy’s little darling is caught behind the bike shed on her knees. Who will Mother blame for her behaviour? She will blame the school, society, the media the young fella getting the BJ, in fact she will blame everyone but herself. She will drive her little treasure to school because she is afraid that a paedophile will snatch her yet she doesn’t see the irony in dressing her child up in the very sexualized clothes that attract these predators. Anyone who has studied the hunting patterns of sex offenders will tell you that adult clothes on young children, especially clothes that carry an underling sexual message increases the danger of attack by a sex offender.

      Reply
  • Where has my comment gone? Is thejournal messing about? This keeps happening :(

    Reply
  • My comment gone too….very annoying!!!

    Reply
    • Wonder if we’ll get an explanation? It’s happened a fair few times lately and really irritating,especially when you submit and see it on the thread then later go back to see it has disappeared grr

      Reply
    • John N 02/07/12 #

      Hi Geraldine,

      Sorry your having issues with the comments, we’re looking into it to see what’s going on.

      Quick question for you that should help us fix it, when you make a comment, are you seeing the comment appear and then when you come back is it gone? If so, what device are you making the comment on, and is it the same device that you check later?

      Thanks,
      John

      Reply

Add New Comment