TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Column: These arrests won’t tackle the root causes of crime in Limerick

On Limerick’s estates, crime is being spurred by pressing social problems – and they’re not going away, writes sociologist Niamh Hourigan.

Niamh Hourigan

Yesterday, gardaí arrested five men over the Limerick murders of Shane Geoghegan and Roy Collins. This is good news, but it won’t tackle the real causes of gang crime, writes sociologist Niamh Hourigan.

THE ‘PITCH FOR Shane’, a terracotta army created by ordinary Limerick citizens this month to celebrate the life of murder victim Shane Geoghegan, serves as a stark reminder of the continuing challenges posed by gangland crime in Limerick city.

However, a number of arrests by gardaí this week in the Geoghegan and Roy Collins murder investigations show how much has been achieved since 2008. The increasing number of gardaí policing the city, the establishment of an Emergency Response Unit and the installation of CCTV systems have all impacted on crime rates.

Community policing has been particularly successful in building better relationships between gardaí and residents of disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Limerick. In this context, the most recent crime statistics for the mid-west for the 12 months ending in September 2012 – which show a marked and continuing decline in violent crime rates – deserve more fanfare than they have received.

Perhaps this lack of acclaim is linked to a fear of complacency in a city which has been hit hard by the current economic recession. During the Celtic Tiger boom, Limerick city possessed some of the most socially excluded districts in the Republic of Ireland. Reductions in welfare payments and deeps cuts to healthcare, education and juvenile justice projects are only likely to worsen this social exclusion. Limerick is also facing a growing heroin problem which has generated a raft of new concerns in relation to street crime, muggings and child protection.

‘Young children are being exploited to gain territorial control’

Apart from the crime statistics, though, there are other reasons for hope. 2012 will see the amalgamation of Limerick city and county councils, which may lead to progress on the complex housing management issues which have bedevilled local authorities in the city since the 1960s. The new Joint Authority will also be in a stronger position to develop the commercial core of Limerick city, providing the jobs which are so necessary to preventing social exclusion.

However, there are some trenchant problems in Limerick which are not visible in local crime statistics. In August of this year, Fr Pat Hogan, parish priest in Southill, highlighted the continuing problems experienced by residents in his parish in relation to intimidation and anti-social behaviour. Within my book Understanding Limerick: Social Exclusion and Change, I highlighted the specific difficulties in tackling the anti-social behaviour of children under 12 in disadvantaged neighbourhoods.

During the interviews conducted for my research on fear and feuding in the city, residents repeatedly indicated that the anti-social behaviour of young children was being exploited by gangs to gain territorial control over pockets of disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the city.

The age of criminal responsibility in Ireland at the moment is 12, therefore gardaí are not in a position to tackle the anti-social behaviour of the under-12s. Child protection services are not in operation in the evening and during the weekends when anti-social behaviour is at its most prevalent. It is possible that much of the good work being achieved by agencies like Limerick Regeneration will be undermined if measures to tackle the anti-social behaviour of the under-12s are not developed.

Another invisible issue which contributes significantly to social exclusion in Limerick city is moneylending.

In many disadvantaged families, deep poverty and stress leads to active addictions to alcohol, drugs, or gambling. In these households, money from welfare payments which should be devoted to providing food, heat and clothing for children can end up in the pockets of the local drug dealers or bookies. These families then turn to local money-lenders who charge extortionate interest rates. In some cases, these money-lenders will ‘keep their book’ for their social welfare entitlements, go with them to claim the entitlements, keep the money and keep the book until the debt is paid.

‘Law-abiding families will be pushed into the arms of moneylenders’

During the three years I spent researching the links between crime and social exclusion in Limerick, I found that this practice of illegal money-lending played a significant role in pushing vulnerable families deeper into poverty and in some cases, into criminal activity.

As cuts to welfare loom in the next budget, it is likely that even the more advantaged law-abiding families in disadvantaged communities – who are already struggling to make ends meet – will be pushed into the arms of moneylenders.

Of the many failures of the last government, one of the most significant was the failure to tackle financial exclusion in Irish society. Many law-abiding hard-working families in disadvantaged communities still have difficulties opening bank accounts and gaining access to credit and saving schemes because of stigma linked to their address or dependence on welfare payments.

In the UK, Gordon Brown, for all his failings, made active and concerted efforts to force banks to provide services to socially excluded citizens in British society by establishing a Financial Inclusion Fund and establishing a special taskforce to tackle financial exclusion. These measures were designed to specifically to prevent vulnerable families on benefits becoming prey for parasitic money-lenders.

While Irish banks seemed happy to flood the country with cheap cash during the Celtic Tiger boom, many residents in stigmatised neighbourhoods remained excluded from their services.

Now that Irish citizens have taken on the burden of paying for the irresponsible behaviour of Irish banks, is it not time that we insist that Irish banks also take a more active role in promoting financial inclusion and make their contribution to tackling poverty-based crime in Irish society?

Dr Niamh Hourigan is Lecturer and Head of Graduate Studies in Sociology at University College Cork. Her book Understanding Limerick: Social Exclusion and Change is published by Cork University Press.

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • Are we forgetting about parental responsibility? Why would parents let their children run wild? This was highlighted with the murder of the 12yr old girl in Blanchardstown. She told her parents she was going out after midnight and they let her out???

    Reply
    • Yes I agree that parents should take responsibility. When I was young there was very little money; People barely had food on the table in some cases and they were a lot more ‘deprived’ than today. They had respect for people and their property. If they were given a house by the local authority, they appreciated it and it wasnt vandalised in a short time as is the case today.the parents were able to teach their children right from wrong. Now children are demanding from parents everything from high end clothes to hi tech phones and other gadgets. they aren’t expected to lift a finger to help anyone. We had to do errands for the elderly and were taught to respect them. We have gone too far to the other side now as parents and need to take our responsibilities more seriously.

      Reply
  • I live in Limerick and its the same old excuses to explain delinquency – kids have nothing to do, it’s the Govt’s fault etc etc. Many of the kids aspire to criminality, from seeing mobsters driving around in flash cars having never worked a day in their lives, which starts off as delinquency. They graduate to running for drug dealers, to selling and on it goes. Due to gangland murders and high ranking gang members getting locked up, there are frequent vacuums that have to be filled which makes easy money a reality to kids in a small time frame. The Limerick City motto in Latin is “Urbs antiqua fuit studiisque asperrima belli” which translates loosely as “an ancient city well versed in the arts of war”. Should we be surprised? People here have been knocking the lard out of each other for millenia.

    Reply
  • Waffler 24/11/11 #

    poverty may lead to “survival” crime like theft but it doesnt explain the gang culture which is based on pure greed not survival. someone who sets fire to kids in a parked car or murders a bouncer cant blame being disadvantaged for their actions.

    Reply
  • In my opinion many of the problems associated with socially deprived urban ghettos can not be seriously addressed and the true nature of the problem can only be ‘prodded at’.
    Many of these urban crime gangs are family based and are of a certain sociological group that it is hard to openly discuss the root causes of their existence and the underlying network that work within. If I were to openly identify the subculture of these gangs and family background the PC brigade would be up in arms straight away. One only has to talk to or listen to the Guards that deal with these problems on a daily basis to know about the real issues involved but the Head of Graduate Studies in Sociology at UCC can hardly be seen to be espousing the theories of eugenics or Social Darwinism.
    Grandiose notions about social exclusion are all very well but when you have a particular filial based gang intimidating householders out of their homes the interest of establishing a family based enclave it puts the issue of social exclusion in a wholly different light.
    The idea of making bank services more accessible to people from these family based gang enclaves has me in raptures here! I can just imagine them!
    There has been many cases highlighted of the absolute fear that ordinary decent people live under in these estates which are ruled and dominated by these family gangs and access to bank facilities is the least of their worries.

    Reply
  • I grew up in area in Dublin that could be compaired to these areas in Limerick and to say poverty is the reason for crime is wrong. In my class in primary school you could tell who’s parents let them run amoke and those who taught their children the difference between right and wrong. A few years ago we counted those who either went to prison, ended up a junkie and those who are dead ( aids and crime) from our class. There was no surprises.
    Family values and a good old fashion punishment system is what’s needed. Anyone who says locking them up is not the answer doesn’t live beside these people, if you live beside a violent Anti social criminal and he gets locked up for a spell your standard of living goes up tenfold. Lock ten up, 3 serious crimes and never let them out.
    As for money lenders well a long prison spell for those who engage in this practice would put a stop to this very quickly. It’s not as if we don’t know who these people are.

    Reply
  • I spent some of the happiest summers of my life visiting cousins in Limerick so I am really upset about the bad name it’s got. There is no doubt that the gang culture that exists within the families on these estates is not going to be easily solved. But herding disadvantaged families into estates like I saw on a recent programme on tv3 is a disaster and a downright disgrace.

    The residents on these estates have to use another address on cvs to get apply for jobs FGS! Ireland is going nowhere until we look on all our people as humans not statistics.

    Everyone has a value and something to contribute to society. I firmly believe that the current system of doling out the dole to long term unemployed is unimaginative and its no wonder there is so much crime.

    Nobody deserves to be dumped on the scrapheap. It suits because the system is lazy. There would be far less crime if people felt part of their community. If we look around our country there’s plenty of work to be done. But corralling disadvantaged people into these type of estates and hoping to forget about them is just plain imbecilic.

    We have a real community driven socialist president now and I hope Enda won’t gag him. Time for a real change!

    Reply
  • “…but it won’t tackle the real causes of gang crime”. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Yes it will.

    Jailing convicted criminals always stops the crime committed by them and sets an example to their peers. Criminality, anywhere in Ireland exists because it is not confronted and punished by a weak and “trendy” judiciary. To claim that poverty or “disadvantage” causes crime is an outright lie that fails to address why others who are just as poor, do not commit crime. It is insulting to lump ordinary people of limited financial means into the same pot as common criminals.

    Ms. Hourigan writes like she read about this stuff in a book. I’ll bet she doesn’t have to live in one of these blighted communities. I’ll bet she doesn’t have to live with the consequences of what she is advocating.

    Reply
    • She is advocating ‘that Irish banks also take a more active role in promoting financial inclusion and make their contribution to tackling poverty-based crime in Irish society’. What exactly are the negative consequences to this that these blighted communities will have to deal with? i only ask because you don’t make it clear in your comment. In fact you seem to be implying that Ms. Hourigan is advocating ‘trendy’ sentencing, which she has quite clearly not.

      Also, do you understand the difference between ’causes’ and ‘contributes to’? Here’s a hint, it is related to the difference between single and plural, simple and complex.

      Reply
    • I don’t believe that it will, Jim.

      Where a lucrative black market is in place, like the drugs trade, there will always more players waiting to step into the shoes of those who are killed or jailed.

      But I do agree that poverty in itself isn’t the root cause of crime. Personally I think that the causes go beyond simple economics – it’s a meaningful activity for those participants, often it’s as much about the transgressive “buzz” in breaking the rules and getting away with it, as it is about the material rewards.

      The “trendy judiciary”, though? Don’t make me laugh.

      Reply
    • I should say, though, that I agree with the author completely – the social exclusion caused by poverty is a key contributing factor to crime.

      Reply
  • Most of the people commenting have no real experience of the social conditions which spawn criminality.
    It’s no use theorising on it, until you have seen it at first hand and experienced it over a significant period of time you are merely a distant spectator. The only thing that will make a lasting impression on crime and the thought processes that produce it is education. Education of the right kind, starting at the bottom and sustained by the state in an ongoing way. What I mean is education for life, education that is relevant to the lives people lead in the modern era and definitely not some concoction dreamed up by people who are pandering to different values to those found in the environment inhabited by the people of the lower social economic group.
    When we do that we will at long last begin to address the real issues. In dealing with crime, we keep hacking at the branches whereas we would do a lot better to desist and instead snip a few of the roots. Furthermore and very significantly, the actions of the priviliged in terms of their absolute smartass but callous abuse of power and the positions entrusted to them has unleashed a lot of unrestrained activities on the part of the less well off who feel that since the rich can act without restraint well so can they. Now truthfully, who is to blame for that, I wonder ? The answer is to reinvest in education with a better focus and to put in place a tough regime to carry through the democratic will of our people.

    Reply
  • Very well put @John McGroarty

    Reply
  • Wait, a sociology is actually a thing? I thought it was just a subject that D4 girls did while attending Trinity College.

    Reply

Add New Comment