Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland
section 99 problems

Man who mugged student freed from custody amid suspended sentence law confusion

Officials at the Department of Justice are discussing the ramifications of the ruling with the Attorney General.

A HOMELESS MAN who was out on a suspended sentence when he stole from shops has had his case dismissed because of the recent Constitutional ruling on suspended sentences.

In March 2013, Judge Patrick McCartan sentenced Karl O’Brien (24) to four years with two suspended for the mugging of a UCD student in Dublin city centre.

O’Brien had pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to the robbery of Barry O’Sullivan on Dame Street on 18 September, 2011.

Last December O’Brien pleaded guilty at Dublin District Court to offences, including a minor assault and theft, committed in January 2015.

Garda Peter O’Brien told the court that O’Brien had stolen food from a shop in Dublin city centre and later hit the shopkeeper outside the shop.

As per the “Section 99” legislation, part of which was ruled unconstitutional yesterday, the District Court remanded O’Brien to the next sitting of the Circuit Court because he was serving a suspended sentence from that court.

No order 

This morning Derek Cooney BL, prosecuting, told Judge McCartan that his instruction from the Director of Public Prosecutions was that no order should be made in light of the recent decision.

O’Brien was in custody but was released as a result of the inability to re-activate the suspended sentence.

Garda O’Brien cautioned him to appear again at the District Court for sentencing on the more recent offences.

At his 2013 hearing the court heard that O’Brien had admitted to the mugging but said he had no memory of it as he was on a “two day bender” at the time. He had 20 previous convictions at the time.

The victim was walking along Dame Street on his way to a concert when he was dragged down a laneway by four men. The court heard that two of the men kept watch, while O’Brien and another man beat Mr O’Sullivan until he handed over his belongings.

The robbers took a Nokia phone, a wallet, a neck chain and €15 in cash before fleeing the scene. The total value of the stolen items was €155.

The re-activation case today was remanded on two occasions since December last.

In February lawyers for O’Brien told the court he was doing well and Judge McCartan asked for the Probation Services to carry out an assessment.

Confusion

Today’s developments come amid confusion over what will happen to address the problem.

In a statement today, justice minister Frances Fitzgerald insisted the government still has the power to introduce emergency legislation should it be required.

“The consequences and implications of Justice Moriarty’s judgement have been under urgent examination in consultation with the Attorney General,” the minister said.

Comments have been closed for legal reasons.

Read: Minister insists Dáil can deal “quickly” with suspended sentences ruling >