This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
Dublin: 24 °C Monday 25 June, 2018

Appeal against 'unduly lenient' sentence for rapist who served no jail time

Magnus Meyer Hustveit was sentenced in July of last year.

Image: LinkedIn

A NORWEGIAN MAN who was given a wholly suspended sentence for raping his girlfriend multiple times while she slept must wait to hear whether he will be sent to jail following an appeal by prosecutors.

Magnus Meyer Hustveit (25), had pleaded guilty at the Central Criminal Court to one count of rape and one count of sexual assault committed against his 28-year-old girlfriend between 2011 and 2012.

He was given a wholly suspended seven year sentence by Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy on July 13 2015.

Waived her anonymity

Hustveit, whose former partner waived her right to anonymity so that his identity could be published, returned to his native Norway after sentencing.

In seeking a review of his sentence today on grounds that it was “unduly lenient”, prosecuting counsel Mary Rose Gearty SC cited a former Chief Justice when she said that it wasn’t easy to imagine circumstances which would justify a non-custodial sentence for rape.

Gearty said there were multiple rapes in this case and a “shocking betrayel of trust”.

It was unusual in that it combined a sleeping victim and a relationship.

Counsel said the victim’s trauma was increased by Hustveit’s suggestions that she had lied about the symptoms from which she was suffering. Hustveit had instructed his lawyers to cross examine her in relation to what she said about the symptoms, Gearty said, when the disclosure of medical documentation was not forthcoming.

It made matters so much more distressing for her, Gearty said, and lead one to question whether Hustveit was “filled with remorse” and had taken “responsibility for what he had done,” as had been submitted on his behalf.

‘Flawed understanding of the law’

Gearty submitted that the judge erred by not acknowledging that this range of behaviour and class of conduct merited a lengthy period of custody.

Coupled with that was the judge’s “flawed understanding” of the law, Gearty submitted.

The judge operated on the basis that that if the conviction comes from of the mouth of the accused, he could eradicate any custodial element from one of the most serious offences on the statute book, she said.

Counsel for Hustveit, Caroline Biggs SC, said the exceptional circumstance in this case was “the all important email” Hustveit had sent to his former partner in which he acknowledged what he had done.

He pressed ‘send’ on the email because she had asked him, Biggs said. She needed to understand exactly what he had done so she could get closure and move on with her life.

Hustveit had put his own interests aside and acknowledged that what he was doing may well lead to a prosecution when there wasn’t a shred of evidence against him and no prospect of a charge, Biggs said. There was at its very highest the possibility of a sexual assault charge, she said.


The rational for the sentencing judge saying that he had never come across such a case did not relate to the act but the way Hustveit had dealt with his culpability, Biggs said.

She said the law did not mandate that suspended sentences could not be afforded for rape.

The cumulative affect of the email and all other mitigating factors – his previous good character, young age, low risk of re-offending, general assistance to the authorities and plea of guilty – put this case out of the normative range. She said Hustveit had gone through a “battery” of tests from Norwegian psychologists.

Biggs said the DPP were seeking to punish her client for seeking to cross examine his former partner on her medical information. It had to be tested, she said, and the cross examination wasn’t lengthy.

Reserving judgement

Mr Justice George Birmingham, who sat with Mr Justice Alan Mahon and Mr Justice John Edwards, said the court would reserve judgement.

Mr Justice Birmingham said the court appreciated that hearings such as this caused stress for everybody.

He said Hustveit’s status – he was present in court for the hearing – remained unchanged but that should not be taken as any hint or indication one way or another as to the likely outcome of the appeal.

Hustveit’s victim, Niamh Ní Dhomnnaill, was also present in court with several friends and supporters.

Comments have been switched off as legal action is ongoing. Additional reporting Michael Sheils McNamee

Read: Court to hear appeal that wholly suspended sentence for rapist was ‘unduly lenient’

Also: No jail for man who raped his girlfriend up to 10 times while she slept

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

About the author:

Ruaidhrí Giblin

Read next: