TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Students lash out at plans to change law on universities

Five students’ unions believe allowing the government to control pay rates will also mean controlled curricula.

Image: Trinity College photo via Shutterstock

THE STUDENTS’ UNIONS at five of the country’s seven universities have criticised plans to reform the laws surrounding Ireland’s universities, which would give the government the power to centrally control pay rates for staff.

Education minister Ruairí Quinn is drafting legislation to amend the Universities Act from 1997, which gives each university’s governing authority total autonomy in relation to the number of staff that a university can hire and the amount its staff can be paid.

The proposals, which have already been approved by the cabinet, would return direct control of these to the Department of Education – a move the unions say is unnecessary and could undermine the universities’ ability to decide what courses they teach.

In a statement this evening the presidents of the students’ unions in UCD, UCC, NUI Galway, DCU and of both unions in Trinity (undergraduate and postgraduate) said the changes were “a knee-jerk and populist reaction to recent expenditure and remuneration controversies”.

Universities were already fully accountable in their spending because of their responsibility to the State’s spending watchdog, the Comptroller & Auditor General, and to the Dáil’s Public Accounts Committee, they said.

“This Bill undermines the internal control mechanisms and the ability of the Universities to innovate and develop strategies for the future”, they said, arguing that “constructive engagement” with the colleges was required instead of direct intervention by central government.

“University Management, in consultation with members of the academic staff, must be able to design and implement curricula independent from fear or realised government intervention,” they said.

This amendment threatens principle of academic autonomy and will relinquish control of such decisions to the Minister and the Department of Education.

The students cited the recent problems regarding grant distributions at SUSI – the grant processing body set up by the Department of Education to process maintenance grants for new students – as an example of how the intervention of central government could be anti-constructive.

“Irish Universities are reliant on human capital and being able to secure Academic Staff who can facilitate the highest quality learning and research among students, which in turn produces the highly skilled graduates a smart economy requires,” they concluded.

By taking away control of the most important element for success from those managing the institution and passing it to the Minister and the Civil Service the government are putting the quality of teaching and learning in Ireland in grave risk.

Read: Ireland launches ‘radical’ new university rankings system

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • I agree that salaries are often bloated (not low wage earners!) but I don’t trust the government to get it right though. I see salvation in universities starting to work smart and use the “internet” concept in conjunction with traditional to face learning. Reducing the cost of education enabling access to all is paramount.

    Reply
  • The proposed change doesn’t take into account the complex funding sources in most universities; corporate research funding, EU funding, philanthropic funding, earned revenue… It doesn’t make sense to give give one funder absolute control

    Reply
  • Quinn playing the populist and short-sighted game again. Some legacy you’re creating, Minister.

    Reply
    • So, currently Universities enjoy “total autonomy in relation to the number of staff that a university can hire and the amount its staff can be paid”. That’s an incredibly stupid way to operate from a budgeting perspective. While I disagree with the D.o.E being in charge of them, I think an amount per student would be the best way to go and would mean all universities are equal.

      Reply
    • John I don’t think you get it, at present the uni get a fee per student (plus any other money the raise through licensing etc…) then the choose how to spend this including wages of staff.
      The change will mean the loose a big part of the budget control which means all universities will pay all lecturers about the same

      Reply
    • Universities are not primarily about undergraduate students; adding to existing research is the main objective. Your model doesn’t take this into account.

      Reply
    • I’ve seen many top lecturers leave my Universities’ department for other universities over the years, for the UK and Germany, where the pay and research budgets are higher. Most past lecturers, all very competent, were fresh out of a Phd or a postdoc before teaching, they leave after a few years to teach at another university. They are not retained. Kinda like 2nd Division Football player snapped up by a Premier Division club.

      Irish universities need to compete internationally with other universities to attract the best and brightest. In turn, top lecturers also attract further funding and investment for postgraduate research. If lecturers pay is equalised across the board universities can’t compete between each other for top talent, everyone losses.

      Reply
  • I think if the government (any government) could dictate the curriculum based on the future needs of the economy (jobs, predicted areas of growth etc) then that would be a welcome move. Given that they haven’t a hope of achieving this please leave it in the hands of the professionals. It’s primary and secondary education that needs an overhaul, start there Ruairi

    Reply
    • Following your logic a lot of courses like World Religions and Theology, Classical Civilizations and other niche courses would disappear. Do you think that’s a good thing?

      Reply
    • @ Liam – that’s not the function of a university. A university is not about training people for specific roles, it’s about advancing existing research.

      Reply
    • @Liam, I think the government should give extra support to economy boosting courses. But…To dictate what courses do and do not exist, due to economic profit sounds terrible to me, I would feel disheartened by the country’s new education system and emigrate. Having courses exist because they sell, sounds good to me. Supply and demand.

      Reply
  • Why is it that each time there’s an article about Universities, it’s always a picture of Trinty that goes with it? We have many other beautiful campuses in Ireland – food for thought!

    Reply
  • Denis 30/01/13 #

    In the 60′s students protested against denial of human rights for non-whites and other oppressed minorities and against imperial vested interests in post colonial Asia. Today it’s against constraints on bloated budgets, oh dear!

    Reply
  • Ger 31/01/13 #

    I’m a student. Fully support this. The fact that Universities have continued to pay bonuses etc. that they were explicitly told they were not to pay, shows that they cannot be trusted with this.

    Once they overpay on salary, the State has no real remedy. Refusing to pay the salary means the Uni will just take it out of something else.
    This is the only way to ensure they are paying only salaries they are supposed to.

    Reply
  • If people saw some of the obscene salaries staff in the universities are on from low to high level they wouldn’t be so critical. I think the Irish state is mature enough now to be trusted not to interfere with the curriculum.

    Reply
  • pauric 31/01/13 #

    Headwreckers

    Reply

Add New Comment