TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

‘Subversive website’ comments taken out of context – FF Senator

Marc Mac Sharry said yesterday that certain online forums amounted to “legalised subversion of the State” but insisted today his comments were taken out of context.

Senator Marc Mac Sharry
Senator Marc Mac Sharry
Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

FIANNA FÁIL SENATOR Marc MacSharry has defended his criticism of online forums yesterday saying that his view that they amounted to “legalised subversion of the State” was taken out of context.

Speaking in the Seanad yesterday, the senator said: “When people are tweeting, texting or online, for example, on boards.ie and Politics.ie. In my view that does not amount to free speech, but legalised subversion of the State. It is fundamentally wrong.”

He was the subject of considerable criticism on both websites yesterday but he defended his comments today.

Mac Sharry insisted that he was speaking in the context of the misuse of a tweet during the RTÉ Frontline presidential debate, an incident which he said “had the potential to subvert the State”.

Speaking to TheJournal.ie today Mac Sharry denied that he was attacking Boards.ie or Politics.ie saying that: “There will be people who choose to interpret this as a personal attack on fora. It certainly isn’t that. It’s the fact that we need to look at all of these areas. I am pro-free speech.

“What I meant and the whole train of the debate was on standards in the media relative to the misuse of kinds of social media and online media as a reputable source that is unverified. In that context, the misuse of them by traditional media can be subversive.”

He said the criticism of him on Politics.ie, which he noted ran to some 50 pages and had, he said, been described to him by some as “frenzied engagement” was “focusing on a context that wasn’t there”.

Frontline inquiry

Mac Sharry echoed his party’s call for a public inquiry into RTÉ’s use of the ‘bogus tweet’ and the overall editorial processes behind the controversial final presidential debate last October.

“Everybody who was involved in it [the Frontline debate] all feel this is something that shouldn’t have happened,” he said.

“It is something that had a bearing on the outcome. I’m not saying it would have changed the outcome but it changed the actual result in terms of votes. It was the Frontline that did that”.

“We need to understand how it happened and why it happened. There needs to be an independent inquiry but far be it from me to dictate how that should happen.”

The Taoiseach said yesterday that the government would not be ordering a review of the Frontline programme while the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, which has already adjudicated on the ‘bogus tweet’, said there was no reason to review that decision.

The BAI last week upheld former presidential candidate Seán Gallagher’s complaint over the programme, ruling that the “broadcast of a tweet incorrectly attributed to the official Martin McGuinness for President Twitter account was unfair to the complainant.”

In full: Our coverage of the RTÉ Frontline debate controversy >

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • The thread on politics.ie contains little ‘frenzied engagement’ but is rather aimed at taking the proverbial out of him.

    Reply
  • His rambling attack on free speech was probably down to stress caused by the fact that his family are caught up in a court case concerning development land and property. This is a man who was tipped to be a future leader of FF by the Sindo. Crikey, if he can’t keep his cool around the stress of court cases then he is hardly fit to be a cllr for that party.

    You may be familiar with his daddy, Ray McSharry. He had to resign from the Govt. in the 1982 after being caught in possession of Gardaí bugging devices he was using to record his cabinet colleagues. He said he got them from the then Justice Minister Seán Doherty who was bugging journalists homes and phones and shown to be interfering with criminal cases for personal and political gain.

    Apart from having a poor grounding in ethics and public service from the family side, McSharry has proven that he does not have the intellectual horsepower to be a public rep. Time for him to have his daddy arrange a new job for him.

    Reply
  • Give me subversion of the State any day over outright FF treason of the State.

    Reply
  • Starting to retract what he said or trying to re-spin what he said?
    Yep, he’s a standard FF politician!

    Reply
  • Aidan 14/03/12 #

    At least we know how he feels about free speech, laughable

    Reply
  • The comments from this senator are a throwback to a Victorian period when the people’s “betters” knew where to draw the line. Does he travel in and out by horseless carriage?

    Reply
  • Alan.V 14/03/12 #

    I think governments around the world and here are really scared of the Internet and the power it gives the little man.

    Reply
    • AlanV.
      they are terrified of us having a voice and that we will join the ”dots” and realise what they are really up to ….

      Reply
    • The Irish Spring will start any day now.

      Reply
    • @skeolawn,
      Sadly, I don’t think it likely. We as a nation, for the most part are too content with our lives. Most people have homes, electricity, running water, food etc. We haven’t yet been pushed out of our comfort zones and nothing dramatic will happen until that does happen.

      We had our chance a year ago to shake it all up, and nothing has changed, just the party in charge.

      Please don’t think that I believe we should shut up or anything, but the fact is, we’re too apathetic in our politics because we no longer have severe hardship (bar a small amount of people).

      Reply
    • @Seán
      You say we had our chance to “shake it all up” but what do you mean? Who would we elect instead of our current government and what would you have liked them to do? Is the fact that nothing has changed perhaps to be seen as a vindication of the decisions of the outgoing government in their twilight months rather than an indictment of the present lot? Ultimately, despite the leftist zeitgeist we are NOT on the streets regularly enough to justify the cynicism that many people here and elsewhere online/across the media seem to present as omnipresent in Irish society.

      I’m not saying I think this government is overly impressive but what exactly is so bad about it, given the reality of our situation? The left will always be up in arms in times of recession and that is good because it is the most vulnerable that take the biggest hits. But does the left have to collapse into sniping cynicism? Why can’t we try to have some discussion in this country where the left forfeits it’s self-righteous indignation and actually attempts to convince conservative Ireland that its ambitions can be reasonable as well as noble?

      I’m no undercover blueshirt – just tired of the cynicism, tired of the self-indulgent detachment. This is OUR country and though the buck stops with government WE are the ones that are responsible.

      Reply
  • alan 14/03/12 #

    unbelievable that a member of the senate should come out with rubbish like this. if anything, HE is the one who is ‘subverting’: subverting the right of people to express themselves freely in the forums of their choice. a real killer to think that we are paying this man’s wages and then he makes worthless pronouncements like this (the kind of thing that would be dismissed instantly or laughed off if he was to make it here for example, yet because they are made in the senate they are taken serioulsy. same goes for norris (senator and tv critic) and his comments yesterday. if they are trying to highlight the uselessness of the senate they are doing a good job!

    Reply
  • The quote in the second paragraph shows he wasn’t speaking out of context. Maybe he didn’t mean to phrase it that way but it shows a big contempt for social media and free expression online. Boooo.

    Reply
    • It’s a contempt for the right of people to set their own agenda,where the likes of Mark cannot call up editors or journalists etc etc to spin an article. In the modern era, it is harder to hide his parties activities in the dark corridors and car parks of hotels.

      He could not care less if it is online or offline. This is a man whose father had to resign as part of a scandal in the Haughey years over the bugging of journalists in 1983.

      When you grow up in that kind of house how can one expect to know right from wrong. He had no chance, the poor kid. At least he connections were able to get him a 100k job in the Seanad.

      Reply
  • Sad, all the same, when a member of the Seanad has to state that he is pro free speech. I mean, shouldn’t that be a given for a democrat?

    Reply
    • He’s not pro free speech. His comments show he’s actually against free speech.

      However, “free speech” is one of those interesting things that everybody has to see to be pro – even if they’re against. Like the way racists can’t accept that they are actually racists – because everybody knows being a racist is a “bad thing”. Orwellian indeed.

      Reply
  • “Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?… Has it ever occurred to your, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?… The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking-not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”
    - George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 5

    Reply
  • Will Martin the Reformer discipline him?

    Reply
  • He didn’t mention TheJournal.ie.

    We need to try harder.

    Reply
    • He did when I spoke to him earlier but only in the context of lumping it in with any other website such as Facebook and Twitter. His general point was that he was referring to online media and platforms on whole.

      Reply
  • Scarr 14/03/12 #

    There is an uncomfortable level of negative interest from this government regarding online freedom, be that in terms of speech or actions we can take. I foresee this heading towards the Powers that be attempting to regulate the Internet ala the newspapers. I think they hate not having a mouthpiece online like rte or the sindo.

    Reply
  • Ciaro 14/03/12 #

    Marc McSharry, son of Ray, estate agent, career senator, gobshite!

    Reply
  • B7584 14/03/12 #

    Cant take the heat?

    Reply
  • People, why can you not all just do what FFG/Labour tell you to do .. FFS, stop this non-compliance and become good little droids for the established parties, and then they will be happy… Pay your household charges, and what was the new bill brought in bg FG 2 weeks ago to restrict internet freedom???
    And no more sarcastic comments by anyone about FFG/Labour. This is against the states wishes.
    1984 … Big Brother is watching you and is not happy ….
    Anyone who doesnt comply to the established parties is a “Shinner” and shoul be sent for re-education ….

    Ahh to hell with the subtle attacks … FFG/Labour want to control us .. They can go fcuk themselves. I will not be put in a corner and told not to challenge these crooks and their idiotic decisions.

    Reply
  • Marc bought a massive bank of land along with a group of his Daddy’s friends in Hazelwood, Sligo – what he is defending at the moment is that he and this buddies didn’t immediately flip the Green Belt/Unlined land deal to a larger group of ‘investors’ and thereby removing the need for Cash advancement to the bank for the original finance loan (now in a state controlled institution – no doubth) This ‘Senetor’ is a walking example of what is still wrong with FF and is reason enough for a call to abolish the Seanad

    Reply
  • Yip total gobshite with a very low IQ. Where would he be without his daddy? This fool never stood on his own two feet . . Never!

    Reply
  • Himself and Leo Varadkar should form their own political party, the PDs. Protests Denied Party. Do these people realise how anti-democratic their comments seem to some people, including anyone with an IQ?

    Reply
  • another senator talking shite…two in the one week

    Reply
  • this guy is a real chip off the old block!

    Reply
  • Shall we shut up like he wants us to ?
    Shall we like F**K … No we will continue to have our say ,
    and discuss the politicians and their lack of ”character” :)

    Reply
  • Yeah the riots in the Uk scared the shit out of them

    Reply
  • Why was my earlier post removed?

    Reply
  • With the amount of comments that are frequently removed from this site while not breaching any code except some personal secret code of the censor/editor, I thought that Marc McSharry had a job with the Journal

    Reply
  • Being fully aware that “My comments were taken out of context…” is quite a standard defence when people say silly things, it should be noted that considering he was speaking in the context of #tweetgate, it would appear that his comments were genuinely taken out of context…
    Calm down p.ie warriors!!

    Reply
  • The man has a point, but it’s not so much subversion of the state, more that the kind of people who spend more of their time posting online are the kind of people who have the time and inclination to do so.

    Reply
  • There’s nothing wrong with expressions of opinion. The problem it seems to me is the opinion offered there is often bile and that’s probably what Mac Sharrey was driving at.

    Reply
    • If he was driving at that, why didn’t he say it. He’s a politician, presumably he chooses his words carefully – or do you mean he’s not competent to express himself?

      Reply

Add New Comment