TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Transgender woman becomes first to enter Irish same-sex partnership

Transgender people can currently only enter same-sex civil partnerships if their new gender was registered in another country.

Image: Mr.Thomas via Flickr

SOCIAL PROTECTION minister Joan Burton is drafting legislation to address a legal problem where transgender people can only enter a civil partnership if their new gender was recognised abroad.

The loophole arose after it emerged that a transgender woman was able to enter into a civil partnership with her partner under the Civil Partnership Act introduced in 2010, even though the State currently has no mechanism to formally acknowledge the acquired gender of a transgender person.

The woman’s gender was officially recognised by the Civil Registration Service because their gender had been acquired in another state.

Burton said the circumstances had come about because the transgender woman, who is from another EU country, had her acquired gender recognised in her country of origin.

She was therefore able to have this acquired gender recognised in Ireland, with the Registrar General obtaining legal advice to the extent that the State was permitted to rely on the documents presented by the transgender woman, and not obliged to ‘look behind’ it.

A bill is now being drafted by the Department in order to offer legal recognition to the acquired gender of Irish persons, which will give equality to Irish people who seek to change their gender.

TENI, the Transgender Equality Network of Ireland, welcomed the news of the draft legislation and have urged that it be introduced as a matter of urgency.

Director Broden Giambrone said the group welcomed the State’s de facto recognition of the resident’s preferred gender, and asked Burton to “move quickly so that all transgender people in Ireland can enjoy the same right.”

‘Matter of equality’

Sinn Féin justice spokesman Jonathan O’Brien, who raised the matter in the Dáil, said the legislation was a “matter of equality”.

“People should have the right to equality and that is at the core of it,” he said.

The current legal situation, where transgender people could enter into civil partnerships in Ireland but only if their new gender was acquired in another country, “discriminates against people and it shouldn’t.”

O’Brien said the current status of the legislation meant it was not likely to be introduced within 12 months, a timeframe which he found unacceptable.

While Ireland currently allows transgender people to hold passports and driving licences reflecting their preferred gender, it did not allow birth certificates to be amended to reflect an acquired gender until the successful challenge taken by Lydia Foy in 2007.

In that case Foy, who was born a male, successfully argued (at the second attempt) that Ireland had failed to provide a “meaningful recognition” of her female identify, and had therefore breached a provision of the European Court of Human Rights.

Despite that ruling, however, legislation has not yet been brought to successfully amend Irish law. The Irish government initially indicated its intention to appeal the High Court ruling to the Supreme Court, but withdrew this challenge in 2010.

An independent committee came up with legislative proposals last year, but TENI criticised its report for proposing that people in heterosexual marriages be forced to seek a divorce, undergo a gender reassignment and enter a new civil partnership in order to remain married to their previous spouse.

Ireland is one of the last countries in Europe to amend its laws and offer statutory recognition of transgender people.

Explainer: Gender Identity issues

Read: Australia adds third gender to passports

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • It’s a civil partnership they’re talking about lads, your precious traditional marriage is untouched.

    Reply
  • ‘Marraige’ and ‘Civil Partnership’ are not mystical pacts but Social Constructs whereby two fully consenting adults formalise and seek to have their legally committed relationship recognised by the state to provide security in reguard to their shared assets and next of kinship etc. Congratulations to Dr Foy and partner and anyone else who decideds to formalise their committed relationship and Poopoo on anyone who may have mistakenly self-attributed upon themselves the notion that they hold the rights of relationship formalisation exclusivity or interference into the consenting lives of others.

    Reply
    • I cannot understand why people object to same sex marriages on religious grounds. Nobody is asking for religious marriages to be available to same sex couples – it’s entirely up to a religious organisation what they allow. However it’s not up to religious organisations or their followers to decide whether people are married in the eyes of the law. Furthermore law makers shouldn’t be deciding the availability of civil marriages on the grounds of their own religious beliefs.

      Reply
    • I used to be of the opinion that same sex marriage was wrong. But then I realised that what I was indoctrinated with is complete bollocks.
      Marriage is not a natural occurrence, but a social construct as you’ve said Lee. If two people of any sexual orientation decide they want to get married, we have absolutely no right to stop them nor basis to object.

      Reply
    • I love your first line Liam..
      sorry to be pedantic but it’s worth noting it’s a social construct founded on a natural occurrence as most social
      constructs are. Humanity has a tendency toward long term pairing.

      /Naturally/ of course this is selected for because it allows children a better chance of survival.
      If it didn’t then it wouldn’t be as selected for and it would likely not occur as often.
      The fun thing about it is that even though in this country the child’s survival chances and subsequent reproduction are not dependent upon the child’s parents staying together for longer than conception we still have the tendency towards long term pairing as this is not a conscious reason based decision on our part.

      @Conor
      It’s a lot easier to understand religion if you start calling it culture, to illustrate why this helps, talk to a catholic in Ireland about their faith versus talking with a catholic in Mexico, you will get a very different answer, you will almost certainly find them stating that things contrary to scripture are part of their faith purely because their parents and their community hold it to be true.
      People hate someone trying to change the culture of a community, they hate it, they feel threatened and they are right to, their community won’t exist unless it shares a culture.

      All of this is very natural, but when I say natural don’t think of it as positive, rape is rather natural in a lot of species, so is affection, think of it as arbitrary, when you hear me saying natural, think instead of the word as the phrase: “the way it has been doing since pre history”.

      But the fact is our culture has to change, and we need to challenge our culture, from our drinking habits to our reluctance to accept collective responsibility for the crimes of those we empower, it has to change because we have new circumstances, and like our dna, any culture we might adopt should only be sustained as long as it brings a benefit and it will only really change completely in the next generation.

      Reply
  • Thanks Jim

    Reply
  • Hey guys….Please stop making God angry. The weather wasn’t that nice yesterday as a DIRECT result of this type of stuff.

    Reply
  • fair play to her…she has some balls…ohh no wait a minute

    Reply
  • The core of the GRA ( Gender Recognition Act) legislation should be based on equality and human rights and nothing more. The principle should also apply to civil marriage. .Religion has no place in this debate. Unfortunately our legislators in both cases are jumping through hoops to avoid a legal challenge under our outdated 1937 constitution. The sooner we amend this document with a constitutional convention and seriously look at how we as a nation want to be governed by it’s rules the better. If it were not for the European Convention on Human Rights and subsequent judgments based on it we would still be in a legal back water, all be it with still some way to go.

    Reply
  • Why is this news? I wish the media didn’t make a political issue out of people’s private affairs.

    Reply
  • Interesting argument, if you feel and behave like a female, take female hormones, look like a female, I suppose you are de facto female now.
    But if you are born with a willy, testicles and genetic makeup XY, the birth certificate reflects the situation at birth, no?
    If I no longer feel 52, can I change my date of birth to reflect my youthful good looks?

    Reply
    • Maybe if you knew some transgender people you would understand the situation a lot more.

      Reply
    • And as if by magic one appears :)

      Age is something we all have to experience. Most seem to unfortunately forget that transgenderism this is an actual medical issue and not something dreamed up by lefty liberal doctors. I can assure you that 15 minutes with any of us over a cup of tea and you will understand the issue.

      Mr Brady, I’m sure ye have phenomenal youthful looks and they should never keep you back from being who you need to be to the best of your ability.

      Reply
    • transgendererersInTheConversation++

      OK @Jim I think this is worth reading in that it will answer your question http://freethoughtblogs.com/nataliereed/2012/03/28/bilaterally-gynandromorphic-chickens-and-why-im-not-scientifically-male/

      the tl;dr is that there is more to male/female than chromosomes.

      Also regarding how you feel younger. You are trivializing something really serious. I know you probably don’t know anyone going through this but it’s worth considering what it must be like at least. Not just to imagine if you had a female body but still felt male inside but what kind of pain must someone be going through in order to put themselves through a transition. If your DNA wasn’t mis-configured then you would be out of your mind to go through it.
      A little respect would go along way, particularly for people who don’t get a lot of it.

      Reply
  • There was report drafted recently, it took a year to do it, and it made some recommendations about what legislation for this kind of thing would look like.

    If you are familiar with this area you will quickly notice that they spent a year photocopying the British legislation. Something that was great for it’s time and practical for England but utter madness if they actually attempted to implement it here given our laws concerning divorce. Total waste of tax payers money and a serious blow to equality.

    Reply
  • I’m confused!

    Reply
  • Marriage is not what it used to be

    Reply
  • Marraige mean nothing anymore,is now a fashion must have…FACT

    Reply

Add New Comment