TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Here’s how Britain is getting its citizens to ‘behave’

The Behavioural Insights Team – nicknamed the ‘Nudge Unit’ – is working behind the scenes to stop Britons smoking, get them to pay taxes and other behaviour modifications.

The 'nudge' approach is designed to be a little more subtle than telling citizens what not to do.
The 'nudge' approach is designed to be a little more subtle than telling citizens what not to do.
Image: Michael Zysman via Shutterstock

IT IS A RIDDLE faced by cash-strapped governments the world over – how can people be persuaded to make decisions that leave them healthier and happier, while saving taxpayers’ money at the same time?

In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has set up a team to test out the theory that a gentle prod in the right direction can go a long way.

Nicknamed the “nudge unit”, the Behavioural Insights Team has been quietly reshaping a swath of policies to coax Britons into behaving – whether that means paying their taxes on time, saving energy or quitting smoking.

By tinkering here and adjusting there, the nudge unit claims that it will have saved Britain £300 million (€361 million) over the next five years — taking even its director David Halpern by surprise.

“We’re steadily surprised by how well it works,” Halpern told AFP in an interview at Cameron’s Downing Street residence, where the 12-strong team has been based since its creation in 2010.

“There’s more demand than we can meet. We’ve had pretty much every government department coming to us saying, ‘Can you help us with this policy?’ – and we’re getting a lot of requests from other governments.”

Favourite tactics

The nudge unit’s favourite tactics involve making it easier for people to do what the government wants it to do – and, perhaps less obviously, telling people what their peers are doing.

  • In one of its most successful examples, the team began sending letters to late taxpayers which casually mentioned that most people in their town had already paid.

This psychological trick boosted payments by 15 per cent, adding £30 million to the government’s coffers in a year.

“We’re very social creatures. When you see other people doing things, you tend to do the same,” Halpern explained.

  • In another experiment, the team looked at how to encourage people to save energy by insulating their attics – something that 40 per cent of homeowners have yet to do, despite years of government subsidy schemes.

Research revealed that for many Britons the main obstacle wasn’t the cost — it was that they used their attics to hoard junk they were too lazy to clear out.

“So we started offering a loft clearance scheme,” said Halpern. “Once we did that, we got a three-fold increase in uptake.”

Other governments are so interested in the nudge unit that it has begun selling its expertise abroad, helping Australia’s New South Wales state and another undisclosed government to set up their own.

Behavioural economists

Inspired by behavioural economists such as Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, the US duo who turned “nudge” into a political buzzword with their 2008 book of the same name, Cameron set up the unit immediately after coming to power almost three years ago.

He is not the only world leader to embrace the theory. Thaler has advised several governments including Denmark and France, while Sunstein held a senior post in US President Barack Obama’s administration until last August.

  • There are countless international examples of nudges. Famously, Schiphol Airport in the Netherlands dramatically cut spillages in its men’s toilets by etching fake insects into the urinals, giving passengers something to aim at.

But Britain has taken the idea a step further by setting up a government office dedicated to the art of nudging, a move Halpern said was heavily influenced by the feeble state of the British economy.

“When there’s no money around, these approaches start to look especially attractive,” he told AFP.

But the use of nudge theory by governments has been met with suspicion from some corners.

One Australian columnist described it as a “toxic import” that should not be welcomed by New South Wales.

Critics… deride interference by the ‘nanny state’

“Instead of democratic debate and argument, it opts for subliminal psychological techniques and manipulation,” Frank Furedi argued in The Australian.

British critics have also suggested that that nudging is a sneaky form of state intervention – and one that does not sit easily with Cameron’s Conservative party, who often deride interference by the “nanny state”.

But the nudge unit denies that there is anything underhand about its techniques.

“Almost all policy is about understanding how people behave and trying to encourage them to behave differently,” argued Halpern’s deputy, Owain Service.

The nudge unit says it simply encourages people to make good decisions for themselves – and Halpern happily admits that this doesn’t always work.

In another loft insulation scheme, Britons were offered discounts if they clubbed together with their neighbours.

“People really liked the idea, but they didn’t actually have that conversation with their neighbours,” Halpern laughed. “It might work in a country other than the UK, where people talk to their neighbours a bit more.”

How do you feel about the idea of society being given a ‘nudge’ to behave ‘better’, as outlined in the examples above?


Poll Results:





- © AFP 2013

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • i wonder if these techniques could be used in reverse on politicians themselves to make decisions that would benefit the public they’re meant to serve. ;-)

    Reply
  • In Ireland all that would be needed was to tell people they couldn’t do something you wanted them to do. Problem solved

    Reply
  • We’ve had this in Ireland for a while particularly in our revenue/excise. The plastic bag tax is a really good example which has been studied and copied elsewhere. Basing road tax on emissions is another good example, where Irish people have proven to be a bit too nudge-able, resulting in a serious loss of Revenue. I’m all for it and don’t see a correlation with the nanny state. If anything it’s moving us away from that by guiding personal choices instead of instructing through legislation, e.g. you’re free to continue getting plastic bags for your weekly shop, only now there’s a financial incentive as well as an environmental incentive not to.

    Reply
  • I am not sure that the article stresses the win win benefits of nudge theory enough – rather it describes it as a technique for governments to get what they want. The idea is that people often make poor decisions because of the environment in which they operate. For example, impulse purchases are often made in the last 20 seconds of a transaction – what surrounds the till in most newsagents? Crisps, chocolate, cigarettes – imagine the till were surrounded by healthy food snacks such as fruit? This would encourage the customer to make a better decision for him/herself.

    Reply
    • Not necessarily…its intended to make people do what they are wanted to do, not what they should do..but as you say, the flip side is that when people are informed of this it might just make them put a bit more thought into whether to do something or not.

      Reply
  • Perhaps the British government could forward some of these ‘nudge theory’ letters to companies like Starbucks, Amazon, Boots, The AA, News International, Vodafone, Manchester United and Google thus encouraging them to pay their taxes.

    Reply
  • Pearse 03/02/13 #

    Our government has done something here as regards the Property Tax by issuing letters to householders indicating that your neighbours have paid which in many cases has been very untrue. The Nudge Theory: we should call it ‘the nudge nudge wink wink theory’ . There’s been a lot of that type of stuff going on…..

    Reply
    • Pearse
      I don’t think any of those letters were untrue. There were always neighbors that had paid the Household Charge and letters saying this were clearly true. The Nudge theory is not based on telling untruths because that could arouse suspicion and result in the opposite effect.
      If we broadened out thinking here and considered some of the most undesirable public behaviors such as bullying and littering etc there are huge benefits for society were we to use this idea more generally.

      Reply
  • Aleo48 03/02/13 #

    I fear that the “nudge theory” as outlined here may only serve to develop the universal “**** off” reflex.

    Reply
  • 300 million generated over 5 years, being a government scheme it probably costs 500 million to run over the same period!

    Reply
  • That is the last thing I want is Kenny and his mob of clowns trying to brain wash me.

    Reply
  • If it cuts down on the huge amount of bureaucratic waste, failed government programmes etc. and improves peoples relationship with government services it is a good in my opinion.

    Another important action that should be taken is the use of Randomised Control Trials on government interventions. Often the state has no clue about whether a policy or intervention will work before it’s rolled out.

    Spending a bit of time and money upfront to test the policy could save huge amount in the long run

    Reply
    • This contributes to the lack of trust people have in those in power. Using your example above of telling people 60% of their area have done something, like paying property tax, when they clearly haven’t, just continues to erode any trust you have in the media printing it and the government pushing it.

      Reply
    • Jim, i didn’t mention anything about property tax. I’m not sure what example you’re referring to, sorry.

      Two (very general) factors in low levels of trust are a lack of transparency on the side of government and a readiness to base opinions on random anecdotal evidence (word on the street) on the the side of the public.

      Randomised control trials informed by nudge theory is one small step to increasing transparency and improving the evidence related to policy interventions.

      Reply
  • Government here has been doing it for a while.
    Numbers of household tax registrations ring any bells, playing up numbers of nurses taking yellow pack jobs, septic tank registations… they’re all in the post, wink wink!
    You better jump on board or you will be on your own! Haha Teachers and their pupils.

    Reply
  • Nudge nudge wink wink, haven’t we had this type of politics for years.

    Reply
  • sensational idea, absolutely love it. Using words that make you think rather than words which invoke fear or anger. Well done the UK.

    Reply
  • I think the best nudge-type approach was Twenty’s Plenty in Scotland, where they put up 20mph road signs in built up areas (that in other parts of the country would be 30mph zones) when they changed the legislation. It’s just as it says: Twenty is plenty. Why do you need to go any faster through a built up areas with children, elderly people, traffic lights and queues? Sensible, protestant, I love it.

    Reply
  • I can’t see this working in Ireland as it requires a carrot and stick approach, when it came to loft insulation in the UK they used the carrot approach; “So we started offering a loft clearance scheme,”. In Ireland our governments prefer the stick, every time.

    Reply
  • Name and shame… photos etc should be on a billboard. Look people in the neighbourhood not paying taxes and living off yours.

    Reply

Add New Comment