TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Burton: Unemployed who work over Christmas “should not have any concerns”

Those who are unemployed are able to work or attend a training course for up to eight weeks without it impacting on their various allowances.

Christmas lights on Dublin's Grafton Street.
Christmas lights on Dublin's Grafton Street.
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

THOSE WHO ARE unemployed should not be put off taking temporary jobs over the Christmas period, the Minister for Social Protection, Joan Burton TD, has said.

“Improvements” in the department now meant that any unemployed person could work or attend a training course of up to eight weeks and still have their payments “reinstated without delay”.

Those wishing to avail of this need to contact their local social welfare office both before and after their period of work or training.

Burton said:

The period between now and Christmas is a very busy one for many employers and they may need to take on extra staff for a short time. Jobseekers who take on temporary work of up to eight weeks will not lose out on any secondary benefits when they resume claiming their jobseeker’s payment after temporary work.

Read: Careers clinic: Get a reference… from your colleagues >

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • I can remember listening to one of the politicians last year, if i remember coreectly, Stephen Donnelly, speak about hurting his back and having to deal with the social welfare. after being refused paperwork as it was to be handed out at a particular time, he rang a supervisor who rang the social welfare office to give him his paperwork, when he went back in, he asked if they could give him the paperwork, and they told him yes come back between this time and this time tomorrow. When you are dealing with some people within the Social Welfare Office like this, it will never work.
    I know where I live, if I find a job for a few weeks, i Have my repeat claim sorted within a week of that job finishing, but I have heard of people in other parts of the country who could be waiting for 6 or 7 weeks, that when you have no money coming in is morally wrong on the deciding officiers part. The paperwork is there, just frozen, and its not as if yoiu would have earned a vast amount of money that would affect your claim in a few weeks.

    Reply
  • Paul – I think Ms Burton is one of the few effective ministers in this govt. She seems to have a genuine interest in her portfolio. All she is doing is clarifying the situation – surely there’s nothing wrong with that. When u compare her to the likes of Reilly, Quinn and Hogan she more than holds her own.

    Reply
    • Neil. Effective Minister. What she is doing is making political capital out of the misery we are in. Genuine interest, If she is that interested then let her take a pay reduction, better still, let her survive on 180 per week . I don’t compare her who to anyone, She is part of a collective Government that sit down and make colective decisions that effect all of us. They prmoised a lot and delivered nothing but misery

      Reply
    • I know someone who recently waited 9 months for FIS payment to come through – hardly effective and hardly encouraging people to go back to work when doing so sends you into more debt and leaves you even less able to meet mortgage repayments – people out there are trying to get work but this government is punishing them for bothering! Don’t believe a word they say – they really haven’t a clue about how much people are struggling – don’t think they care either!

      Reply
  • It’s not up to government to create jobs; it’s up to the government to create the conditions required to allow for job creation i.e. making it easier for businesses to develop and grow so they can take on people.

    Reply
    • So goes the ‘Efficient Markets’ orthodoxy of the last decades. Just hand out tax breaks to business & keep hands off when it comes to ‘regulation’.

      Precisely the kind of thinking that has created this mess & the deep & prolonged unemployment that has followed & is still getting worse.

      The real ‘conditions’ that need to be ‘created’ to stimulate employment is an increase in aggregate demand (spending). The EU has done exactly the opposite & we see the results – more countries slipping into crisis.

      The government sector should, & easily could, play a role that would quickly lead to recovery. We have a currency issuing authority – the ECB – that could finance a Job Guarantee (at minimum wage, & strictly voluntary for the unemployed) entirely debt free. The spending of those JG wages would have an immediate demand stimulus effect & importantly help to rebalance a deeply flawed Euro system. (In the same way as regional assistance & balancing transfers take place in sovereign currency issuing countries like US & UK.)

      Unemployment benefits already provide a similar ‘automatic stabiliser’ function to help maintain demand (spending) & avoid further uneccesary knock-on job losses. But without our own currency issuing authority (or low gov borrowing rates – if we insist on the myth that a currency issuer must ‘borrow’) & given the severe depth & international nature of the recession, & massive private sector debt after being royally scammed by the banking sector, the existing automatic stabilisers are woefully inadequate. (And being diminished further by deliberate policy vandalising our economies.)

      Of course, for the top few percent, which includes political leaders & their economics ‘advisers’, their is no recession. Rather, if anything, opportunities to buy assets, like rentable property, at firesale prices.

      Ever wondered why the bogus, ideolgical rubbish that passes for mainstream economics is so well supported as ‘sound’ policy? Falsely presented as ‘…no alternative..’ ?

      Our so-called ‘authorities’, elected & paid by us, have nothing to gain, indeed probably something to lose, by adopting policies in the interests of ordinary citizens (the majority).

      The last few years, & the cause of the original banking bust are unequivocal proof.

      Reply
    • Listen to the truth about the Eurozone mess here:

      Modern Money & Public Purpose 3 : The Eurozone

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpIsZL5FJVs&feature=player_embedded

      Reply
  • It seems a bit of an oxymoron that people are afraid to lose a jobseeker’s allowance by seeking a job.

    Reply
  • no it went bust,he was a bra fitter

    Reply
  • A young lad that comes into the pub told me he took a job and 3 months later it went burst ,he signed back on the dole in september and is still waiting for his money. So beware folks.

    Reply
  • I can only presume that the jobs Ms. Burton is talking about are in the North Pole!

    Reply
  • It’s a bit late to be giving out this info, any employers taking on Xmas staff aren’t leaving it till the end of November to do so.

    Reply
  • Perhaps those of us paying tax all year could have Dec tax free ! Only 4 weeks , not a lot to ask !!!!!

    Reply
  • “Should have no concerns” the verb “should” is in itself very un-convincing !!! Romantic ireland is dead and gone! It’s with I O’Leary in the grave!!

    Reply
  • I presume they will get their tax back as well, I would be unthinkable if they had to contribute to a society which has been bailing them out……..

    Reply
    • Pay tax?? Don’t be absurd, they will most likely be given a “declaring bonus” as well as their Christmas bonus.

      Reply
    • there is no christmas bonus, it was the first sw cut after the bank collapse

      Reply
    • He Ronan so paying tax gives you your worth in society? so if somebody paying more tax than you cut in front of you in a queue that would be ok then?
      How bout motor tax should those with bigger engines therefore paying higher tax have more rights than smaller vehicles?

      Reply
    • Ronan so paying tax gives you your worth in society? so if somebody paying more tax than you cut in front of you in a queue that would be ok then?
      How bout motor tax should those with bigger engines therefore paying higher tax have more rights than smaller vehicles?

      Reply
    • Hmm, Dermot, there’s a concept… the more you pay, the more you get… I like it, I wonder what we could call such a system… Capitalism, Reality, Equitable maybe, just three possible names… a man walk into a pub with no money and another walks into the pub with money, who will the barman serve? If you earn and contribute then you have a right to partake and complain etc. but if you have your hand out for your “entitlement” not having contributed (If you have paid stamps and contributed, but lost your job or are on genuine disability, this is not for you…BTW), then sit back down and be glad you live here, where you are given money for nothing, and not in the US.

      Reply
  • Ah Isn’t she very good for letting the people earn a bit of money of Christmas, such a thoughtful Minister. She would be a lot better in getting down to her work and creating jobs instead of doing the complete oppoisite. Also maybe she xould take a huge pay reduction as she goes about her business in cutting home help allowances,and destroying communites. How Insulting is this Minister

    Reply

Add New Comment