We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Replacing Ruth

Senate votes to advance Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation

Republicans have mostly united to support Donald Trump’s pick to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

SENATE REPUBLICANS HAVE voted overwhelmingly to advance Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett towards final confirmation despite Democratic objections, just over a week before the presidential election.

Her confirmation tomorrow was in little doubt, with the majority Republicans united in support behind President Donald Trump’s pick.

The final vote was 51 to 48 in favour.

Democrats have been poised to keep the Senate in session into the night in attempts to stall, arguing the November 3 election winner should choose the nominee to fill the vacancy left by the late justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Republicans are excited by the chance to install a third Trump justice on the court, locking in a conservative majority for years to come.

Barrett’s ascent opens up potential new rulings on abortion, gay marriage and the Affordable Care Act.

A case against the Obama-era health law is scheduled to be heard on 10 November.

“The Senate is doing the right thing,” Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said, vowing to install Barrett to the court by Monday.

The 51-48 vote launched 30 hours of Senate debate.

Two Republicans – Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, and Susan Collins, of Maine – voted against advancing the nominee, and all Democrats who voted were opposed.

California Senator Kamala Harris, the vice-presidential nominee, missed the vote while campaigning in Michigan.

Vice-President Mike Pence would typically preside over the coming votes but after a close aide tested positive for Covid-19 it is unclear whether he will fulfil his role for the landmark vote.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the Trump administration’s drive to install Barrett during the coronavirus crisis shows “the Republican Party is willing to ignore the pandemic in order to rush this nominee forward”.

The conservative judge picked up crucial backing on Saturday from Murkowski, one of the last GOP holdouts against filling the seat in the midst of a White House election and with more than 50 million people already having voted.

Murkowski said she disliked the rush towards confirmation but supported Trump’s choice of Barrett for the high court.

She said she would vote against the procedural steps but ultimately join GOP colleagues in confirming Ms Barrett.

“While I oppose the process that has led us to this point, I do not hold it against her,” Murkowski said.

Now the only Republican expected to vote against Barrett is Collins, who faces a tight re-election in Maine.

She has said she will not vote for the nominee so close to the election.

McConnell noted the political rancour but defended his handling of the process.

He scoffed at the Democrats’ “horror stories” about the judge’s conservative qualifications.

Barrett, 48, presented herself in public testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a neutral arbiter and at one point suggested “it’s not the law of Amy”.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel