Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Anthony Devlin/PA
Media

BBC and The Guardian announce hundreds of job cuts

The BBC intends to implement 520 cuts and The Guardian newspaper plans to axe 180 jobs.

THE BBC AND THE Guardian have both announced plans to cut jobs today, as UK media outlets reel from the pandemic’s economic fallout. 

The BBC said today it will go ahead with hundreds of newsroom staff cuts delayed during the coronavirus crisis. The Guardian newspaper has also said it plans to axe 180 jobs.

In January, the BBC had announced plans to cut 450 newsroom jobs to meet changing audience needs and savings targets. Today the broadcaster said it now intends to implement 520 cuts.

The redundancies, which were paused as the Covid-19 crisis hit Britain severely from March, will now be implemented “in stages”, it said.

“If we don’t make changes, we won’t be sustainable,” Director of BBC News and Current Affairs Fran Unsworth, who heads the department’s workforce of around 6,000 people, said in a statement.

This crisis has led us to re-evaluate exactly how we operate as an organisation,” she added, noting it was focused on delivering “fewer stories, more targeted and with more impact.

In separate streamlining moves previously unveiled, the BBC will also shed hundreds of jobs in its sprawling regional operations.

It will axe 450 positions in England, as well as 150 in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, as the broadcaster tries to cut costs and shake up its local radio stations and TV news.

‘Unsustainable’

The Guardian today became the latest British publisher to announce redundancies as the pandemic drives readers online but slashes advertising revenues.

In a staff memo it said the 180 cuts would affect around 70 editorial roles, with the remainder in areas such as advertising, marketing and events.

Editor-in-chief Katharine Viner and Guardian Media Group chief executive Annette Thomas said revenues would be down by more than £25 million (€27.6 million) this financial year, and the pandemic had created an “unsustainable financial outlook for the Guardian”.

The move follows an announcement last week by Reach, which publishes national newspapers the Daily Mirror and Daily Express, and a string of local titles, to cut about 550 jobs.

It also blamed the fallout from the coronavirus crisis, which had accelerated “structural change in the media sector”, with increases in digital revenue not making up the shortfalls from lost advertising income.

Reach’s proposed reduction of 12% of its workforce was part of plans to make annual cost savings of £35 million, it added.

The Guardian announced its cuts alongside financial results for the 2019-20 financial year, which cover the 12 months to the end of March – when Britain’s three-month virus lockdown was just a week old.

They showed company revenues had fallen to £223.5 million. Income from readers through subscriptions and donations made up for a drop in advertising income.

The paper, which switched to a new tabloid format in 2018 to help cut costs, has kept its online content free-to-read and, in contrast to many rivals, not adopted a paywall model.

Viner and Thomas told staff they remained committed to the strategy.

“Despite the pressures that coronavirus has placed on our business, our unique reader relationship model has proved successful, and the strategy of the past few years has been the right one,” they added.

- © AFP 2020

Your Voice
Readers Comments
39
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel