We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The new version of published this evening did not mention the proposed removal of Article 42(5) from the Constitution.

Children’s Referendum website corrected after omitting part of amendment

The government’s scaled-down version of needed amending this evening after it omitted part of the referendum being held on Saturday.

Updated, 21:17

THE GOVERNMENT has published a slimmed-down version of its website on the Children’s Rights referendum, after this morning’s Supreme Court ruling – and amended the text of the revised website after it emerged that the text published on it was incomplete.

The Supreme Court this morning ruled that the website published by the government in September was in breach of the terms of the 1995 McKenna ruling – in that it contained language which implicitly advocated a Yes vote in Saturday’s referendum.

The website was taken offline within an hour of that ruling being published, and was this evening restored with most of its content removed – containing only the text of the proposed new article 42A, which would be inserted into the Constitution if Saturday’s vote is passed.

However, the text displayed on the website upon its return this evening was not a complete version of the referendum text being put to the public – as the single-page website had omitted a reference to the proposal to delete a section of another Article elsewhere in the document.

The edition of the website which returned this evening – shown in the image above – did not include a reference to the proposal which would see Article 42(5), dealing with the removal of a clause which is superseded by a portion of the new text.

Alongside the inclusion of a new Article 42A, the proposal being put to voters on Saturday also includes the removal of Article 42(5), which already provides that the State shall “endeavour to supply the place of the parents” if the parental role is not being fulfilled by the child’s own parents, though always “with due regard for the natural and imprescriptible rights of the child”.

Though this clause is superseded by the provisions being included in the new Article 42A, the wording of the new article is slightly different – in that it removes a clause which says the State can only exercise this role if the child is being failed for “physical or moral reasons”.

This was not referenced on the new website when it first appeared this evening – and only appeared after the replaced website was amended at about 9pm this evening.

Read: Supreme Court says Government’s Referendum site ‘not fair, equal or impartial’

Reaction: Minister: Government acted “in good faith” on referendum information

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.