We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland
Irish Refugee Council

High Court case could be a 'step towards ending Direct Provision system'

The Irish Refugee Council has welcomed the High Court’s decision to grant leave to a family to challenge the system which it says operates at a ‘huge financial and human cost’.

THE HIGH COURT has granted leave to a family of asylum seekers to challenge Ireland’s Direct Provision system.

The decision has been welcomed by support groups with the Irish Refugee Council declaring it a step towards ending Direct Provision entirely.

“We hope that this will be another step towards ending Direct Provision and replacing it with a reception system that meets the needs of refugees at a reduced cost to the Irish taxpayer,” the group said in a statement.

“Direct Provision has operated for the last 13 years at a huge financial and human cost,” added CEO Sue Conlan.

The challenge has been taken on the grounds that Direct Provision – which sees applicants granted €19.10 per week, on top of accommodation and three meals a day – is unconstitutional.

The High Court heard arguments that the system violates rights to family and private life as the families are excluded from social welfare payments.

The family argues that the system has no legal basis, was unlawfully established and is operating in a legal vacuum. They also believe that forbidding asylum seekers both from working and from receiving social welfare payments violates the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.

Anyone requesting asylum in Ireland is placed into one of 35 direct provision centres around the country, where the average length of time spent in the centres is about four years.

The case will begin on 4 November.

Read: Immigrant Council call for clear procedures for stateless people in Europe

Shatter: “It is misleading to call Direct Provision inadequate”

Related: High Court case on whether direct provision is unconstitutional may take 2 weeks

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.