We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A man with the Ebola virus lying outside his house in Freetown, Sierra Leone Associated Press/Michael Duff

There ARE simple treatments for Ebola that could have saved lives

Experts have argued that better managing of fluids and electrolytes could have prevented a number of deaths.

MISCONCEPTION ABOUT THE treatment for Ebola has led to a large number of preventable deaths, according to new comment published today.

Leading expert in the virus, Dr Ian Roberts from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in the UK and Dr Anders Perner from the University of Copenhagan, have disputed the view that there were no treatments for the condition.

The new paper outlines that “it is often stated that there are no proven therapies for Ebola virus disease but that potential treatments, including blood products, immune therapies, and antiviral drugs, are being evaluated”.

“This view is inaccurate,” it contends.


It is argued that the lack of fluids and electrolytes being delivered intravenously could be to blame for a large number of deaths – stemming from the dehydration common with nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea.

The comment article goes on to attack the presumption that practical protocol relating to fluid and electrolyte management would ineffective in the affected regions.

“Before assuming that west Africans will reject the benefits of high quality clinical research we should first seek their opinions,” it says.


It goes on to conclude that a greater focus needs to be placed on the care required by patients with the condition.

This is described as being “not only a humanitarian imperative, but could also help to bring the epidemic under control.”

It encourages treatment centres to act as more than quarantine units, pointing out that sufferers are unlikely to attend if the treatment is worse than what they would receive from their own families.

The full article is published in The Lancet and can be read here. 

Read: Sperm can carry Ebola for at least 82 days — WHO

Also: Good news: Scientists may have discovered a vaccine for Ebola

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.