We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File image of former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams Alamy Stock Photo

High Court trial in London against Gerry Adams set to begin

Adams denies that he had any role in the IRA and is opposing the claim.

A CIVIL TRIAL between three men injured in IRA bombings and Gerry Adams is set to begin at the High Court in London later.

John Clark, a victim of the 1973 Old Bailey bombing in London, Jonathan Ganesh, a 1996 London Docklands bombing victim, and Barry Laycock, a victim of the 1996 Arndale shopping centre bombing in Manchester, all allege that Adams was a leading member of the Provisional IRA on those dates, including of its Army Council.

The trio are bringing legal action against the former Sinn Féin president and are seeking just £1 (€1.15) in damages.

They claim Adams “acted together with others in furtherance of a common design to bomb the British mainland” and was “directly responsible” in various roles within the IRA for decisions made to place devices in 1973 and 1996.

Adams denies that he had any role in the IRA and is opposing the claim.

The trial before Mr Justice Swift, due to begin at 10.30am at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, is expected to last seven days.

Lawyers for the three bombing victims told a previous hearing that Adams should be considered a representative of a class of people who “were members of the Provisional IRA/its Army Council between 1973 and 1996”.

The men also wanted to sue the IRA but Mr Justice Soole said that claim must be struck out because it is “not a legal entity”.

Two of the witnesses due to give evidence against Adams will be anonymous and will speak at the trial from behind a screen.

Anne Studd KC, for the three men, told a hearing last month that one of the witnesses believes “the Provisional IRA or people associated with it still exist” and will be in danger as a result.

She said: “This case is very likely to increase interest again in these issues and this witness, with his past experience, is concerned about that.”

She also applied to include more witnesses being able to give evidence, which Mr Justice Swift allowed.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds