We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA Archive/PA Images
circuit court president

'How can I do the work the Government expects me to do when they wont give me the judges I need?'

The president of the Circuit Court, Justice Raymond Groarke said he would be five judges down in the New Year.

THE PRESIDENT OF the Circuit Court, Justice Raymond Groarke, stated today that if the Government was not prepared to give him judges he was “not going to obey their legislative strictures”.

In one of the toughest judicial criticisms to date of the Government’s refusal to appoint new judges, he said he was already three judges short of the court’s quota and, due to new developments, he would be five short by the beginning of the new legal term in January.

Judge Groarke said that in the New Year, he had to provide a judge for sittings of the Special Criminal Court and another judge was due to take sick leave involving surgery which would leave him five down.

He said if the Government was not prepared to give him judges “I just can’t obey their legislative strictures.”

Judge Groarke was referring to a legal directive under the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 which specifically states: “the Court shall not exercise any power it has of postponing the hearing of an application for interim relief except where it is satisfied that special circumstances exist which justify it in doing so.”

The President, sitting in the Circuit Civil Court, had been asked to set a specific date for the hearing of a claim under the Protected Disclosures Act 2014, known as the Whistleblowers’ Act, by the Principal of St Andrew’s College Junior School, Dr Jacquie Campbell, seeking reinstatement to the job from which she claims she was unfairly dismissed last month.


The College denies she was sacked unfairly and Martin Hayden, SC, counsel for Dr Campbell, said the dispute would take two days for a full hearing and that, under the Act, the court did not have a jurisdiction to adjourn the hearing.

Today’s planned hearing had initially been listed before Judge Jacqueline Linnane who said there had been six new sworn affidavits placed in the court file and she believed it would take more than the suggested two days for the hearing.

“It will take at least a day to open the affidavits to the court,” she told Hayden, who appears with barrister Mairead McKenna and Hayes Solicitors. She directed that the matter be mentioned to the President.

Barrister Tom Mallon, who appears with Tom Connaughton, SC, and Solicitors Mason, Hayes and Curran, for the College said that although there was an issue of protected disclosure in the case he felt it could be dealt with in two days.

Judge Groarke said counsel could forget about the statutory directive in the Act that a case could not be adjourned and must be dealt with on the first day it is before the court.

He said:

How can I do the work the Government expects me to do when they wont give me the judges I need?

Following an adjournment the President told the parties he was aware of the urgencies and would try his very best to deal with it.  He would seek to have the case heard in the second week of December but could not guarantee which court it would be heard in or by what judge.

Termination of position

The court has heard that mediation talks have already failed in the case in which Dr Campbell has stated she was head of the junior fee-paying primary school which has 28 teachers.  She said she had been appointed 11 years ago to what she described as a prestigious position carrying a significant remuneration package.

She is challenging what she describes as a purported and allegedly unlawful decision of the college to terminate her position which, she claimed, was clearly and inextricably linked to complaints she had made to the college Principal and the Board of Governors.

Dr Campbell claims she had not been given any support in dealing with “one particularly difficult family” from whom she had suffered “aggressive conduct,” unprecedented in her 33 years of teaching.  She had felt increasingly threatened and intimidated.

She has already stated she had been shocked when called to a disciplinary meeting for “conduct causing concern to the Board of Governors.”

Hayden told the court today that school parents had already mounted a petition calling for the reinstatement of Dr Campbell. Mallon told the court Dr Campbell could not be reinstated under the Act without the consent of the Board of Governors.

Comments have been turned off as the case legal proceedings are ongoing.

Read: Taxi driver who harassed ex-girlfriend ordered to leave Ireland within 48 hours >

Read: ‘Left to die alone’: Premature baby spent final two hours in hospital sluice room >