We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Pharrell Williams Suzan/EMPICS Entertainment
not so happy now

Pharrell Williams and other mega music stars threaten to sue YouTube for $1 billion

It’s all about copyright and who gets paid for artists’ tracks.

A GROUP WHICH counts some of the biggest names in music among its members has threatened YouTube with a $1 billion lawsuit if it doesn’t pull down 20,000 tracks.

The newly-formed venture, called Global Music Rights, claims the Google-owned site hasn’t got full permission to broadcast thousands of songs hosted on its video-sharing platform.

The group has been spearheaded by industry heavy-hitter Irving Azoff and it controls the performance rights to tracks from artists including Pharrell Williams – the singer behind the hit song Happy - The Eagles and John Lennon.

The developing copyright brawling comes as YouTube takes the wraps off its Music Key subscription service, which will allow ad-free and downloadable tracks to be played on smartphones and other devices.

The group’s lawyer, Howard King, told the Hollywood Reporter that if YouTube didn’t blink first a $1 billion copyright-infringement lawsuit would be filed on the group’s behalf.

(YouTube’s) music service will be adversely impacted if they let this go to adjudication,” he said. “It seems silly that they would let this be the test case.”

The dispute revolves around whether YouTube’s existing deals with record labels also covers the public performance of the songs.

2014 KIIS FM's Jingle Ball - Show AP / Press Association Images AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

‘Serial and wilful infringers’

Azoff previously claimed YouTube knew it lacked the proper license to perform the songs and he labelled the company “serial and willful (sic) copyright infringers”.

YouTube, for its part, claims it has the proper licenses and had struck arrangements with labels and publishers to host artists’ music on Music Key.

Azoff told the Reporter that the reason for singling YouTube out over other streaming services was because it had been the “least cooperative”.

“(It’s) the company our clients feel are the worst offenders.”

READ: The Pirate Bay has been taken down after Swedish police seized servers >

READ: Playboy sues over nude Kate Moss photos >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.