We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Naruto the monkey Wikicommons/David Slater
hail to the chimp

Photographer back in court over monkey selfie

US animal rights activists PETA have taken the nature photographer involved to court over the snap.

US ANIMAL RIGHTS activists filed an unusual lawsuit this week on behalf of a macaque monkey who snapped selfie photographs, arguing it owned the photos rather than the nature photographer involved.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed the suit in federal court in San Francisco on behalf of six-year-old Naruto, seeking to have the macaque “declared the author and owner of his photograph.”

“Our argument is simple,” PETA said in a statement. “US copyright law doesn’t prohibit an animal from owning a copyright, and since Naruto took the photo, he owns the copyright, as any human would.”

The photos were taken in 2011 on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi by British nature photographer David Slater.

He later published a book of his photographs that included two selfies taken by Naruto. The San Francisco-based company that published the book – Blurb – is named as a co-defendant in the suit.

monkey selfie - 2 David Slater / Wikicommons David Slater / Wikicommons / Wikicommons

“If this lawsuit succeeds, it will be the first time that a non-human animal is declared the owner of property, rather than being declared a piece of property himself or herself,” PETA said. “It will also be the first time that a right is extended to a non-human animal beyond just the mere basic necessities of food, shelter, water, and veterinary care.

“In our view, it is high time.”

But Slater insists he owns the rights to the photos since he set up the tripod and walked away for a few minutes only to find out that the monkey had grabbed his camera and snapped away.

He told the Washington Post last year, when the copyright controversy erupted, that the widespread distribution of the photos on the Internet had cost him a lot of money.

“This is ruining my business,” he told the paper. “If it was a normal photograph and I had claimed I had taken it, I would potentially be a lot richer than I am.”

Last year Slater was caught up in a battle with Wikipedia over whether or not the photograph was in the public domain. 

- © AFP, 2015

Read: Photographer loses battle with Wikipedia over this amazing monkey selfie

Also: 8 Humans of Dublin stories that will melt your heart

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.