#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 20°C Wednesday 6 July 2022

Photographer back in court over monkey selfie

US animal rights activists PETA have taken the nature photographer involved to court over the snap.

Naruto the monkey
Naruto the monkey
Image: Wikicommons/David Slater

US ANIMAL RIGHTS activists filed an unusual lawsuit this week on behalf of a macaque monkey who snapped selfie photographs, arguing it owned the photos rather than the nature photographer involved.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed the suit in federal court in San Francisco on behalf of six-year-old Naruto, seeking to have the macaque “declared the author and owner of his photograph.”

“Our argument is simple,” PETA said in a statement. “US copyright law doesn’t prohibit an animal from owning a copyright, and since Naruto took the photo, he owns the copyright, as any human would.”

The photos were taken in 2011 on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi by British nature photographer David Slater.

He later published a book of his photographs that included two selfies taken by Naruto. The San Francisco-based company that published the book – Blurb – is named as a co-defendant in the suit.

monkey selfie - 2 Source: David Slater/Wikicommons

“If this lawsuit succeeds, it will be the first time that a non-human animal is declared the owner of property, rather than being declared a piece of property himself or herself,” PETA said. “It will also be the first time that a right is extended to a non-human animal beyond just the mere basic necessities of food, shelter, water, and veterinary care.

“In our view, it is high time.”

But Slater insists he owns the rights to the photos since he set up the tripod and walked away for a few minutes only to find out that the monkey had grabbed his camera and snapped away.

He told the Washington Post last year, when the copyright controversy erupted, that the widespread distribution of the photos on the Internet had cost him a lot of money.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

“This is ruining my business,” he told the paper. “If it was a normal photograph and I had claimed I had taken it, I would potentially be a lot richer than I am.”

Last year Slater was caught up in a battle with Wikipedia over whether or not the photograph was in the public domain. 

- © AFP, 2015

Read: Photographer loses battle with Wikipedia over this amazing monkey selfie

Also: 8 Humans of Dublin stories that will melt your heart

About the author:


Read next: