We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

spcbrass via Flickr
Your Say

Poll: Should a doctor's note be needed for all sick days?

Sick leave costs the Government and businesses millions every year. So should employees have to provide proof?

THE DEBATE OVER the cost of sick leave has been reignited, after it emerged that sick days cost the civil service more than €26million each year.

The figures have reopened controversy about absenteeism in the public service, which the Government has pledged to reduce as part of the Croke Park Agreement.

However, Ibec has also said that sick leave costs the private sector as much as €1.5billion a year.

Currently, civil servants are limited to seven days of uncertified sick leave per year. However, there have been accusations that this is being abused and treated as extra holiday.

Many private businesses have a similar arrangement, with staff not required to produce a doctor’s note for short absences.

So what do you think? Should a doctor’s note be required for all sick days?

Poll Results:

No (2482)
I don't know (1033)
Yes (666)

Read: The annual bill for sick leave in the public service>

Explainer: How much sick leave can civil servants take?>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.