#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 19°C Sunday 13 June 2021

You might care about your online privacy... but would you pay for it?

Would you pay for any the services you can currently use for free if it meant you had more privacy?

Kevin Koidl

IF YOU ASK anyone how much they care about their online data, and its privacy, they are likely to say they care a lot. But if you ask them whether they would open their wallets to pay for the many services they currently use for free, some would likely answer yes, and many no.

In my experience, asking those on the yes side how much they would be prepared to pay tends to draw the answer that a flat fee such as a fiver or a tenner would be OK, (remembering that most apps cost less than this).

But is it that easy? Online services are expensive to maintain and to adapt as the quality of the services constantly increases in tandem with evolving technology. The perceived concern about losing control of our online data is actually far smaller than the desire to control our purse strings.

How much is your data worth?

To understand the value of your data a bit more you can perform a simple but very powerful calculation; you can take the market cap of each online service that you enjoy using free of charge, and then check via a simple search query what the average number of active registered users of that service is. By dividing those two numbers you will have a fair approximation of what the perceived (by market approximation) value of your data is for that specific service. Some companies also make money with other services not directly linked to your data, but the calculation should be sufficiently accurate to give you a fair idea.

All you need to do now is do this across all services you use on a regular basis (email, social media, video, music, browsing etc) and then sum the pieces. This is what you would have to pay, on average per year, for all the services you currently use for free. My number was close to four digits, just to give you a ballpark idea.

So this brings us to the most important question in this debate: would you rather pay this sum or continue using online services free of charge by consenting to your data being used by third-party companies for use in advertisement, marketing and promotion campaigns? Despite society shouting out loud about its privacy concerns, I suspect the vast majority of us fall into the latter pool.

Someone has to pay and at the moment it’s our data that foots the bill

For me, like many other things in life, this is what this debate comes down to at the end of the day: money. We should certainly not be blasé about the use of personal online data; indeed, there are several simple – and in some case, complex – issues that need to be addressed, both on the legal side and on the services side. However, we often forget that we are talking about great services that we take for granted, and for which we pay very little (or no) money. Someone has to pay, and at the moment it is our data that foots the bill.

For me this is fine, but that’s easy for me to say as I work in that research field and run a college spin-out in the web personalisation space. However, if you don’t like what is happening with your data, and if you think you are not alone, you might consider offering an alternative service that charges its users and keeps their personal data behind lock and key.

If you are thinking about doing this please let me know, as I think it would be a very interesting experiment. I might even help you build it. While I suspect that maintaining free services will win the battle, I would not mind to be proven wrong.

Dr Kevin Koidl is a Research Fellow in the School of Computer Science and Statistics at Trinity College Dublin and the ADAPT Research Centre.

The User Modelling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) conference, currently being held at Trinity College Dublin, is the premier international conference for researchers and practitioners working on systems that adapt to their users.

WhatsApp fails almost all criteria for data protection

This man’s privacy case against Facebook could be a ‘near-disaster’ for tech companies

About the author:

Kevin Koidl

Read next:


This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

    Leave a commentcancel