Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A new exhibition in the Little Museum of Dublin reflects on the relationship between victims of the Great Famine and people from all over the world who seek shelter in Ireland today.
‘Leave to Remain’ features the story of a young Irishman on a coffin ship bound for Quebec in 1847, in a text written by the Irish novelist Sebastian Barry. This is the text.
THE SAD TRUTH of hard times is there are few heroes.
It was our own people knocked our cabin. The Peelers that came with them up the valley were Dublin boys.
The landlord never made an appearance at all for he did not need to. He could get anyone he liked to do anything he liked because he had the pennies and they did not.
Looking back it seems to me that you will never save a starving people with committees and yet that is what was attempted.
The committee to do this and the committee to do that and then the people dying in the margins between. The poorhouse in Westport so full to the brim that only death made room for more entrants.
The feverhouse behind the great building a factory of suffering and hopelessness. It is hard to look back and tell what was to be seen.
My father came in from the valley when his place was knocked and went into Louisburgh because he was told the Poor Law Guardians would be there and he could ask for a ticket.
The little town of Louisburgh was also full to bursting like it was a fair day but it wasn’t for a fair day. Then the desolate crowd was told that the Guardians had gone up to Delphi Lodge in their side-car and my father would be obliged to follow after.
We were just two wretches holding a hand each, myself and my brother, and of course our mother was dead.
She died on the cabin floor like a mouse melting after being hit with a shoe. She went black as a weed in November.
Up we went my father and ourselves with about three hundred others to see the Guardians. You might not know that district and it is all mountains and cold valleys and rivers as black as dried blood.
Way up the head of the mountains is a fine house called Delphi Lodge. That’s where the gentlemen were having their lunch. We waited out on the lawns in front of the house while they ate.
I won’t even say when was the last time any of us saw food.
The truth is my father was ashamed of our emergency and all the long traipse he never spoke a word. He was a proud man in his way that had worked his quarter acre like a Trojan for long hard years.
Now he was nothing and blowing with his own sons along the road like the curling leaves of autumn.
At length the Guardians came forth and bid us return to Louisburgh and clear off the lawns because the tickets for the poorhouse were below. We had come many miles to hear that.
So with great and strange sighing the whole body of emaciated people turned from the cold windows and back we went the way we had come. Snow and its sister icy rain lashed against us and many started to fall, weak as they were.
Mothers went down and children and then even my father stumbled and down he went. He went down like a shot dog and never to rise. I went on with my brother Jamie following the buffeted crowd and by some strange grace we got back to Louisburgh.
The next day we got our tickets for Westport. It was a seven hour walk across the mountains and by exactly the same narrow track we had come.
The sun because it has no sense of occasion had risen clear and bright as it sometimes does in an Irish autumn and all along the way we saw little humps of people, women with their long ruined faces, and babies and children frozen and starved to death.
A glaze of frost threw its fancy lace across their limbs. We passed them as if we were beings of another world called the living.
Out past Delphi Lodge the country became so desolate God Himself had never visited. It had neither character nor location but seemed merely a blank district of nowhere. Jamie and myself went on and even our hardened feet began to swell and crack.
We came down into Westport and proceeded to the poorhouse but though we had tickets they were useless. In front of the poorhouse was a crowd so immense they made a music like a lamentation of the mad.
By some instinct I cannot identify I brought Jamie to the quay and when night fell we crept onto one of the old ships that we hoped would carry us away.
There were men selling passage on the ship. We had no money so I judged it would be beneficent to stow away. Now you will realise that we had stowed away on Hell’s cargo vessel. The passengers numbered about three hundred on a boat designed for at the most a hundred. It had maybe forty berths.
The people were obliged to bring on whatever provisions they could muster because the master had no food stowed for them.
Water was to be two cups a day and it seemed like water taken from a black drain. The hatches were locked and never to be opened and so began four weeks of filth, destitution, misery and death.
There are no gods and no priests for such a people. We were nothing and so nothing needed to be done for us. The hold remained closed and pitch-black and storms were only to be endured.
Empty bellies vomited the last froth of life and we shat and pissed where we lay. The bilges rolled with every type of human liquid. The air was air that could only have pleased Beelzebub.
All around me people died in a simple conclusion of calamity. Efforts were made in the dark to eat whatever was to be eaten. The abysm of suffering reached has not been described in human history because it would disgust and repel any reader.
No camera could capture it because it all took place in utter darkness as if we were already deceased and we were being punished for terrible sins.
Our sin was that we were poor and therefore nothing.
Our sin was that we were too many in the eyes of the government and that it would be a blessing on the country if we were to perish.
In this way we were described as a plague on our country and nothing more than vermin and rats.
Now a sensible and resourceful God was visiting destruction on us to rid the world of a colossal nuisance.
Will I tell you that Jamie died beside me, a boy of some seven years? I felt for his body in the darkness and touched his cold form.
His body was lying in a shallow lake of filth. That was his burial place, the dark hold of history.
When up we came into the waters by Quebec and the long nails were pulled from the boards of the hatches and light came into the hold like a pour of water.
Bleak eyes reflected it like fireflies in some adamantine region. What had been women stared out as if their minds were cancelled. Men raised their skeletal forms and tried to stand.
Everywhere around me were corpses and corpses with the ship’s rats using them unimpeded.
These small black ministers scampered away into the deeper bilges at the flooding of the light.
A ladder was let down and the survivors were brought up onto the deck. Sailors themselves had died of fevers caught from us and even the master himself was dead.
The ship’s owner had got his money and the brokers had made their profits and they cared neither for cargo nor crew.
Profit in such circumstances is surely on the highest spot on the tabulation of evil. On the list of deeds that cannot be forgiven in any court of man or god.
Quebec was in that time in a great terror about these famished nothings because all we had to offer this new place was a great clamour for assistance.
But we were calling out, it seemed to them, from a region of virulent fever and indeed contagion had already burned through the town and further out into the countryside as if demons were firing heather.
Their solution was to herd us into long wooden sheds. Pastors and women almost insane in their bravery came in to us where we lay on the hundreds of pallets. Efforts were made to feed us and yet many were now beyond the benefit of food. The bodies were carted off and let down into pits.
No place on earth it seemed could have wanted us and all behind were coming another thousand ships heaving with their melancholy freight.
Humanity had slipped away from us and it was as if the candles of our souls had been snuffed out.
We had made our desperate attempt to escape the pestilence of hunger but because we were nothing – nothing could be done for us.
Leave to Remain is on view until April 29th in the Little Museum of Dublin, 15 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
The big 2 parties have an ingrained fear of young people being more active in politics. Besides the fact that younger people tend to be more liberal minded, FF and FG rely on a lot of the grey vote casting their ballot based on their parents/grandparents legacy support from the civil war era.
@The Risen:
And you don’t think a 16 year old would be influenced by their parents? I think there is more chance of an 18 year old showing independent voting choice than a 16 year old which would mean it would be in the interest of FG & FF to reduce the age to 16
@Joe Phillips:
Thanks Joe. Does that mean you believe that 16 year olds will have independent thoughts on their voting and not be influenced by their parents?
@Joe Phillips: ‘@Nick Allen: That’s the greatest load of absolute sh!te I’ve read from you today’
…..so far.
Trust me Joe, he’s only warming up.
@Nick Allen:
That’s total BS.
@The Risen:
Anything but address the points made. You are consistent
@The Risen: “YOUNG PEOPLE” meaning 16 year olds typically live with their parents and do not operate in the same world as me and you. They don’t work pay taxes or bills so why on earth should they have any mention in how the country is run ? They barely qualify to operate a scooter so sssshhhhhh !
@Alfred Pennyworth: most 18 year olds still live with their parents. A lot of 25 year old still do. A fair few 30 year olds still do.
Do you wanna take all their voting rights away too?
@The Risen:
“No to the vote at 16, No to the vote at 17″.
Why did ML O Donnell stop there? The Seanad she is elected/appointed to has a policy of “No to the vote unless you are a University graduate” thus excluding half the adult population of electing our Upper House
#Votail100 #NewPolitics
@Nick Allen: I don’t believe most 20-80 year olds have independent thoughts on voting. Not sure where you think you’re going with that one.
@Alfred Pennyworth: “They don’t work or pay taxes or bills why on earth should they have any mention” so were in the constitution dose it say taxpaying voters only, is ther a bracket?
Maybe if it was lowered to 16 then it would become part of discussion in schools, & lead to more social engagement, & interest in politics going forward. All the students would be in it together, & maybe this would help foster an interest This country could do with that.
Used to think it was a terrible idea, but if you look at it that way, I actually think it could have benefits.
@Ann Experiment:
That’s a valid point but they do discuss politics in school these days, it is also a new subject on the leaving cert from this year. My own opinion is that 16 is just too young.
@Nick Allen: why is it too young? That’s not a full opinion. It’s half an opinion.
@Joe Phillips:
Unlike your quality opinions on here.
I think at that age children haven’t developed critical thinking skills and do not realise the impact of all aspects of what a party is saying. To vote at the age of 16 means that your opinion would have to be informed before that while they were 14 and 15. I don’t believe a child has the maturity at that age
@Ann Experiment: and they could easily be influenced by their teachers preference! Teenagers are impressionable voting age should remain the same!
@Nick Allen: I don’t believe you should have any right to make that call about people you don’t know. I think people are more than sufficiently aware of their surroundings by 16 and should absolutely have a say as to whether the system is working for them.
@Joe Phillips: do you think 16 year olds are adult enough to make their own decisions?
@Paddy: I know some that absolutely are, yes. I also know plenty of 18+ year olds that aren’t.
The bottom line is our health and housing systems are very, very broken and they were broken by middle-aged people in suits.
They’re the worst they’ve ever been.
I think it would make more sense now to apply an UPPER age restriction.
Not really, because that’s not fair, obviously, but neither is telling 16yr olds that the rest of the country chose FFG on their behalf and then expecting them to have any respect for us.
@Joe Phillips: It’s too young to sign a legal contract, buy tobacco or alcohol or get a driving licence….all for a reason
@marg fitzgerald: old enough to pay taxes tho, marg? How do ya reconcile that?
“Give us your money. No, not your opinions. We’ll make the rules and install the rulers. Just give us your money”
@Joe Phillips
You’d be happy to reduce the age one can vote to 16 and collectively make decisions that affect everyone so you should be in favour of all of these….
you’d be happy to reduce the legal age of consent to 16!
You’d be happy to reduce the legal age one can drive a car to 16!
You’d be happy to reduce the legal age one can consume alcohol to 16!
You’d be happy to cut child care supplements at the age of 16!
You’d be happy to send a 16 year old juvenile to an adult prison!
After all these young adults can make decisions that affect them and others.
@Joe Phillips: hmm ‘whether the system is working for them’ ? You really think that would be the outcome ?? Jaysus I am not sure if you have taken a look around ireland but you will only be adding thousands more people to tick ‘the system isn’t working for me box’ – wherever that is ?? I am all for ‘more empowerment’ for young people and we have come a long way from school leavers finishing education at 16- as a coutry we could look at the way we teach irish language ( 18 years compulsory teaching and I still cant hold a conversation ) religion ?? , physical education ?? , apprenticeships ?? theres tons of areas worthy of looking to change and improve for our young people imo.
@Paddy: feck it… I’ll bite for the craic
The legal age of consent is currently 17 so I don’t think that’s as dramatic as you’re making out.
The legal age to drive was originally 17 before being raised fairly recently. It’s 16 in America and I don’t really think that’s the biggest of their problems.
I’m sure I wasn’t the only one in Ireland who was drinking by 16. It probably would’ve been safer to allow me to do it legally than to send me knacker drinkin’ in the woods with naggins of vodka but whatever makes you feel better.
Absolutely happy to cut the childcare supplements at 16. They’re old enough to work, ffs.
To be continued…
Never happy to send anyone to prison but if a 16/17 year old commits a violent crime, yes, I think they should be treated the same as an 18 year old.
Anything else?
agreed. since politics isn’t thought much in schools, the only time young people get political is for referendums. I know many young people who only cared about gay marriage, legalizing weed, abortion and prostitution
@Nick Allen: Most 16 year olds are good at sussing out liars.
Ah, I see that Sinn Féin are trying to ingratiate themselves with the young, probably because their minds are still developing and they feel they can easily influence/manipulate them.
@Johnny Bellew: yeah cos looked at the fully developed geniuses currently running this place like a well-oiled machine. Right wing parties are terrified of youth. Bring it on
@Joe Phillips: *look
@Johnny Bellew: “they can easily influence/manipulate them.”
This from a Catholic defender LMFAO :-)
@Joe Phillips:
I see you have been on the same training course as TheRisen. Lots of deflection, lots of accusation and zero substance and zero ability to actually debate.
@Nick Allen: what?? Did you read the comment I replied to? Have you been up all night on this thing and kinda lost track of things a bit now?
ye using using government funds for their strategic propaganda unit, oh wait…..
@Johnny Bellew: like Bill Kenneally was with fianna fail? #paedo
16 is the legal working age in Ireland. If we are saying that you can work and pay tax at that age then being allowed to vote should be an entitlement.
I’d rather have 16 year-olds voting than the hundreds of thousands of geriatrics still giving the Catholic apologist party, Fianna Fail, their votes.
Why are people afraid of young people voting on their future??. 16/17 year olds have the biggest stake in our future.
@Jonathan Gaffey:
Would 10 and 12 year olds not have a bigger stake?
@Nick Allen: have you ever met any young people?
Would you know the difference between a 16/17yr and a 10-12yr old if ya saw them? Just wonderin’ like. Comparing the two groups is idiotic.
@Joe Phillips:
It must have struck a nerve when I said that I am anti SF. Rather than playing the player trying playing the ball, it’s more effective!
The comment I made is highlighting that 16 year old’s do not have the biggest stake in the future as the previous commenter suggested. It also highlighted that age does matter and it would be completely ridiculous to have a 10 year voting. The debate here is about allowing 16 year olds vote and as I said, in my opinion it is too young. I have also explained my reasoning.
All you appear to be able to do is argue that my comments do not make sense and you aren’t even doing a good job at that. Why don’t you try arguing what you disagree with me rather than just saying my comment is stupid?
@Jonathan Gaffey: I believe I can say without fear of contradiction that the majority of 16 year olds would barely know their a*** from their elbows.
@Nick Allen: your politics have always been apparent on here. You’ve never struck a nerve with me so don’t be worrying.
My point is there is little difference between 16 and 18 year old minds, other than one is aware they’ve crossed a threshold to legally vote and drink and the other is aware that they haven’t. I think bringing 10-12 year olds into it shows you to be extremely disrespectful towards a lot of intelligent young minds and I think you have far too much of a platform on here, with the amount of time you devote to these forums.
Basically, I think you’re part of the old team of dinosaurs that we desperately need to get away from.
@Joe Phillips: difference between a 16 year old and a 12 year old is that a 16 year old can work full time and pay taxes. So they should have a say in how they are used.
@Ben Slimm: Well said, Ben
I personally don’t think the vast majority of sixteen year olds have the maturity to vote or to fully comprehend it. At 16 life is about selfies and snapchat and going to teenage discos it’s not about trying to understand an election.
@Tom Harpur: __ I can think of quite a few adults who don’t understand elections, yet vote in them because they’ve been pre-programmed to do so.
It’s a bit rich for someone, sitting in an anti democratic institution like the senate’ to say they are in favour of people voting when they themselves are not subject to those votes.
Times catching up with corruption in politics. 2 years from now will see seismic changes in the Dail… FF FG and Liebour will not see that magic 100 year rule ;-)
@Willy Malone: O really. So who will be in government after the next election.
@doorhandler:
There must be a new party going to be announced that none of us know about.
@Nick Allen: I would like to invite you all to the pants party.
@Willy Malone: If everyone voted for anyone but FF/FG. and see will the world end.
Absolutely right about that. young people of 16 don’t know enough about politics and that’s what SF and other liberal left wing parties like. Much easier to indoctrinate youngsters and pull the wool over their eyes. The politics of objection and perception appeals to people who are politically ignorant and are used all the time by left wing parties. They need people
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana:
Nicely put
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana: In other words it’s all about FEAR. Fear that those 16yr olds who are full of ideals can see reality for what it is might upset the status quo.
It suits the establishment to wait until the ideals are diluted and polluted.
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana: oh and your in depth knowledge of economics lead you to vote finagael did it?
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana: “Much easier to indoctrinate youngsters and pull the wool over their eyes. ”
Said the devout Catholic.
You don’t do irony do you Sighle?
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana: SF is not a liberal left-wing party
@Sighle A. Ni Chuana: haha, right wing don’t need young idiots, right wingers are idiots for life. Bang on baby
@Dave Doyle: I’d say more about manipulation and spin than fear. Seasoned politicians know how to manipulate and use situations that appeal to voters because it will be something that affects their lives but they won’t have a hope of getting it done because they are not usually in power and if they ever get into Government, it will be with people they can manipulate and use such as 16 year old youngsters.
@Jem Hughes: Actually I studied Politics and economics but I worked in the area of both for some years. I don’t vote FG.
@Jem Hughes: not quite sure what you are actually saying here. I don’t often bring my own personal beliefs into debates.
Two sides to this argument. Some say that 16 and 17 year olds should be allowed to vote as they are mature enough. At the same time their parents are receiving Children’s Allowance for their 16 and 17 year old children. So they are still classified as children by one state department.
No I don’t think she right. Condensending yea. There’s no age limit on being a gobshit.
It’s just a pity Marie Louise O’Donnell didn’t stay away from politics. Another of Enda’s lackeys.
16 is too young. Nobody expects a 16 year old to be fully aware of whats going on politically, and at that age, you are much more vulnerable to propaganda.
The maturity levels and understanding of politics between a 16 and 18 year old are pretty much the same. I think however on important issues that will effect their future like abortion rights and other constitutional issues – I don’t see why the people who will have to live through the consequences or benefits of a vote wouldn’t have a say on it.
Imagine you’re a 16 year old girl and suddenly realised you were pregnant but had no voice in the referendum to decide whether or not you could have an abortion and ended up stuck at home taking care of a child you aren’t quite ready for and losing out on your education.
I think young people do have certain contributions to make in politics. I’m undecided but leaning towards allowing them to vote on referendums that will change our Constitution.
@Seán Ó Briain: Imagine you’re a 16 year old girl and suddenly realised you were asked to vote on something like the Lisbon Treaty, or Irexit.
@Do the Bort man: What of it??
@Seán Ó Briain: so they should be allowed shape the decisions, but not the group of decision-makers?
@Do the Bort man: Or a 16 year old boy
She is right. The last thing I was thinking about at even 20 was fecken politics.
@brendan H: I registered to vote as soon as I was able to
a vote at 16 would help see an end to parish pump politics and would only serve to create a more harmonious society where young people will be given an actual chance to effect change, those who are opposed know that their party is irrelevant to young people, let the young people have their say. The electorate has screwed them for long enough, also there has to be some form of irony in O’Donnell telling young people to change out of democracy when she wasn’t even elected to the position that she is currently in..
@John Madden: I wish I could give you several thumbs up
Good old shinners and their famous altruism. 18 is fine to start voting.
It is cruel to impose a responsibility to immerse themselves in life’s grim realities and understanding the complexities of national policymaking on 16 year olds.
Perhaps those recommending this are hoping that shallow populism is most effective on the minds of children in order to aid their party’s progress.
SF presumably believe that 16- and 17-year-olds may know no better than to vote for them.
@Brendan O’Brien: SF receive the most first preference votes of any party on this island. So good man for insulting such a large chunk of the population.
Such a big ol’ chip on that shoulder of yours.
@The Risen: FF and FG voters are a large chunk of the population (far larger than SF voters in this state) which you seem to have no problem with ‘insulting’.
@The Risen: In a 2 horse race against PBP? Quite the boast. You supporters cling to all manner of irrelevancies. Speaking of chips on shoulders regarding large chunks of the population, didn’t you disparage the “grey vote” who you maintained only voted in line with their parents/ grandparents? You really should think these things through before finger wagging at others.
@Honeybadger197: Extremists like ‘The Risen’ never think things through. If they did, they wouldn’t be extremists. They operate on gut feelings and prejudices.
@Brendan O’Brien: He’s a belieber alright!
Yes, young people who can see the complete f ups, bribery, backhandedness and downright corruption should not be allowed ruin the status quo.
We need forward thinking youth to stop these leeches and parasites from destroying this country even further.
I believe she should find the nearest tree and apologise profusely for wasting its oxygen.
MORON.
In other words, we’re in charge, know your place.
@Kevin Geraghty: Pretty much what I’d tell my kids in most matters, yep!
I have hosted over the years foreign students aged 13-18 from Korea, Germany, France, spain, Italy and Austria. All, no exception, could confidently discuss the current politics of their countries. If you don’t engage with the youth, they grow up uninterested in politics, which is a common issue in Ireland.
On a more serious note. most 16 year olds are struggling with (in no particular order)exams, social media, rapidly changing hormonal development and boy/girlfriend issues etc. Adding a further responsibility on these young shoulders would amount to abuse of said teenagers. Let them have as trouble free teenage years as possible. This seems like a very cynical attempt by left wing agitators. No surprise there, they (the left) are past masters at social engineering attempts.
Free designer Fidget Spinners for every under 18 voter, and be entered in a draw to win the newest iPhone. They’d be the only age demographic with 100% turn out.
@Tommy Roche: I hope you’re joking…..
The only way that young people should not be allowed to vote if it over 70s are banned from voting. Otherwise the voting age should be once you can read and write.
Pity she didnt take her own advice.
I don’t believe in reducing the voting age to 16. It is certainly a time when you want to awaken an interest and knowledge of politics and the political system but I don’t believe a 16yr old has enough life and independent experience to make an informed choice
16 is too young for voting. However young people shouldn’t be banished from politics.
If you are of an age where you could pay tax why should you not have a voice in how your money is spent ?
@Anthony newey: You will when you’re 18, it’s only a short while until you’re 18. It feels like a lifetime at that age though. You COULD spend money on drink too, that’s nearly all tax, still doesn’t make me think to lower the age to drink.
@Gav Quinn: No taxation without representation or something like that rings a vague bell .
@Gav Quinn: No taxation without representation or something like that rings a vague bell .
@Anthony newey: Ok so give them a VAT card so they can scan it with every purchase…?
@Anthony newey: Yawn !!!!!!!
Here, here … who wants some kid who can’t clean their own nose, hasn’t worked a day, cannot support themselves and hasn’t even finished college casting a vote that could have serious repercussions for the populace. Raise the voting age and make it contingent upon experience, employment and maturity!
I personally don’t see the voting age at 18 as an issue. You can wait until you’re 18. I don’t agree that it needs to be lowered. This is actually a non-issue to me, just teenagers being impatient – that goes with the territory.
Another more pertinent question relating to this would be how many 16 year olds actually have an interest in politics or the constitution? How much do they actually know? and is it sufficient enough to justify lowering the voting age?
Wh
@Robbie Delaney: ah balls, my finger slipped. I’m not even going to write my original comment now. I’m just ashamed and embarrassed. I’m sorry.
@Robbie Delaney:
Ah go on, the suspense is killing
@Nick Allen: ah now I can’t remember. This day is going from bad to worse
@Nick Allen: yea, do tell,go on, go on,go on,go on, go onnnn!
They’d hardly manipulate the youth, now would they. Right, left, center, independent or not, 16 year olds can be manipulated by emotion alone. We think companies like CA are bad, they are the future of the corrupt capitalist world. We might as well get used to it.
Not to be a republican at 20 is proof of want of heart; to be one at 30 is proof of want of head.
I assume that all those who oppose lowering the voting age because 16/17 year olds “can’t make informed decisions” would also be in favour of revoking the voting rights of those below a certain intelligence threshold? Why should the future of a bright 16 year old be reliant on the voting whims of a moronic 40 year old?
Of course she would say that. Wasn’t she Endas little lickarse, part of the in crowd. They just don’t want the status quo to change. I’m alright Jack f##k you that’s her attitude. I’d bring the voting age down to 10 if it meant getting rid of the likes of her and her FG cronies.
Good move by SF. Young people are easier to manipulate and would swallow the SF ‘money for nothing’ line quicker than most adults.
35 yrs old – to be the new Vote Limit.
Voting age should be reduced to 35 yrs … to exclude the immature, irresponsible, uneducated who landed us in such a mess – the total crash of our economy in 2008.
What a cheek this Seanad person has to refuse 16 yr olds a Vote.
16 year olds barely know what day of the week it is and most have little interest in politics and rightly so. Let the young be young before they’re poisoned with major political decisions.
I see how you have put the name of the Sinn Fein Senator on the story headline instead of the Senator who made the comments. This is a cheap attempt to associate the SF Senators name with the comments. SHAME on you
@John Mark Creedon: It is not possible to heap any more shame on a gang that is already supersaturated with shame.
Howaya vs D4 showdown
Howaya 1 – D4 nuthin’
@Ooby Dooby: The ‘D4’ lass is from Mayo.
Mayo lass 1 Howaya angry lass 0
No problem with 16 years old voting for European elections, we pick a rubber stamp anyway.
They were old enough to take the Aeroplane /or Boat at the tender age of sixteen in years gone by
M/s.O’Donnell: no doubt was still sucking on the breast of the State at that age.
So you can have sex at 17, but not vote…?? This country is so backwards.
Let kids be kids there’s enough shit waiting for them,when the time comes
Children are not mature enough to vote. Plenty of children are in favour of aborting other children. Enough said!
Does she think being older gives people more insight less bias ? . We need young people’s voices and getting them engaged with politics at 16 yrs is forward thinking not backward .s
She wants the status quo to continue . Young people have imagination new ideas less constrained by life events or position in life it’s exactly why they’re voice is important .her ignorance and place of privilege is astoundingly obvious .not every 16 yr old travels or enjoys the life she describes in fact the majority don’t . Hearing her remarks shows us exactly why politics needs to change become inclusive not for the privilged few
Getting the ride, smoking, drinking, voting and joining the army.
Most of these thing can ruin your life, voting by contrast is safe and boring, the kind of thing a mature person does. How can the young people be expected to make good decisions and be responsible if they cannot cast a vote?
14 I say, with mandatory voting, financial penalty for failure to vote (say 20 quid for a young person and a weeks dole money for an adult) and automatic voter registration.
Can we all just take a minute to recognise the fact that there are men and women in this country with cognitive impairment and dementia voting.
Why? Because it is there right to do so and who are we to stop them exercising their rights?? Was the response I got when I questioned this.
Absolutely scandalous.
It all comes down to education. Whether they’re 16 or 26. In this country unless you educate yourself on the topic it’s always going to be an ignorant vote or a non vote.
Firstly, Give young people a chance to be interested! Educate them, put it on the curriculum, let them make informed decisions on their future – only then will this country see progress
Shut up O’Donnell, you’re Pathetic!!
If a 16 year old is allowed to vote then they will have to be treated as an adult by the Courts.
have your say