We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Sinn Féin TD Pa Daly (L) and People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy.

High Court to deliver verdict on case attempting to quash appointment of super junior ministers

Sinn Féin TD Pa Daly and People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy brought separate legal cases against the government.

THE HIGH COURT is due to deliver a verdict later today on cases taken by two opposition TDs who are seeking quash the appointment of so-called ‘super junior ministers’.

Sinn Féin TD Pa Daly and People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy brought separate legal cases against the government to ask the High Court to declare that the attendance of four Ministers of State at government meetings as unconstitutional.

The TDs argued that the constitution is clear in its description of government and places a limit on the number of ministers who can attend and vote at cabinet meetings.

In response, the government argued that the cases lack coherence and rely on “obscure” distinctions of what a super junior minister is considered to be.

Ministers are appointed by the President of Ireland to sit as the country’s government. Ministers of State, however, are appointed by the Taoiseach and can be nominated by the cabinet.

There are currently 15 senior ministers at cabinet level, but Ministers of State, often referred to as junior ministers, can be selected to attend weekly government meetings. The practice has been frequent since the early 2000s.

Murphy and Daly have argued that the so-called super junior ministers are unconstitutional over constitutional rules over the conduct, business and voting method of cabinet.

The judges in both cases have reserved their judgments, meaning the court’s decision will be published and issued to the named parties involved at a later date.

With reporting from  Muiris O’Cearbhaill

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds