We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
IRISH CAR BONNETS are growing taller by half a centimetre each year, with some SUVs so high that a four-year-old child standing directly in front is invisible to the driver.
Once associated with farming, but now a mainstream choice for commuting and school runs, SUVs are putting pedestrians and cyclists at greater risk in the event of a collision, a new report warns.
Transport & Environment (T&E), a Brussels-based NGO, has conducted the first analysis of European bonnet heights, revealing the upward trend. It called today for legislation to cap bonnet heights.
Over a quarter of Irish cars sold last year had car bonnets of 90cm or taller, T&E told The Journal.
When bonnet heights rise from 80cm to 90cm, the risk of death in a collision increases by 27% for vulnerable road users: pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists and scooter riders.
That’s according to a major study by Belgian researchers in 2023 which also found drivers of regular cars are at greater risk of serious injury in collisions with vehicles with high bonnets.
T&E also commissioned research from Loughborough University in the UK on the visibility of children standing in a central position to the front of vehicles with different bonnet heights.
An average-height driver behind the wheel of a Land Rover Defender – a model that has been heavily marketed in Ireland – cannot see an average-height 4.5-year-old child directly in front of them, making pulling out of a driveway or parking space particularly risky.
By contrast, the driver of a small family car such as a Volkswagen Golf would be able to see a child of this height, 1.1m, at the same proximity.
Newer cars are likely to have automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems, but these may not activate in certain weather and light conditions, T&E said, adding that a vehicle with a lower bonnet and AEB will “always be safer” than one with a higher bonnet and the same system.
At 115cm high, the Land Rover Defender is one of seven Jaguar Land Rover models with bonnets taller than 1m, with three models from Jeep also in this category.
Almost 900 of these extra tall SUVs were registered in Ireland last year, an increase of more than 30% on new sales in 2023, data from the Society of the Irish Motor Industry shows.
Three of the four bestselling new car models in Ireland last year were so-called crossover or compact SUVs. The top-selling Hyundai Tucson has a bonnet 89cm high, as does the Kia Sportage, while the Toyota RAV4′s bonnet is higher again at 93cm.
James Nix, vehicles policy manger at T&E and author of the report, said higher fronted vehicles push the burden of risk and of reduced safety from those drivers to all other road users.
This stops parents from letting children walk or cycle and leads to a vicious cycle of families making more journeys by car.
Over half of primary school and over 40% of secondary school children in Ireland travel to school by car, census data shows.
Nix likened ever higher bonnets to an “arms race” by car manufacturers that is harming public space and the public good.
Marketing of SUVs creates a vicious cycle whereby other drivers may feel they need a bigger vehicle too to feel safe on the road.
Ian Lumley of environmental NGO An Taisce said bulkier vehicles were also bad for the climate, requiring more fuel.
T&E noted research indicating that whereas low bonnets tend to hit pedestrians’ legs, giving them a greater chance of falling towards the vehicle or being deflected to the side, higher bonnets strike adult pedestrians above the centre of gravity, increasing the likelihood that they will be knocked forward and down and be driven over.
Higher bonnets are also more likely to strike adults’ vital organs.
T&E argues that without policy change, the current trend of increasing bonnet height will mean a significant proportion of all cars will have bonnets higher than 90cm in the coming years.
Neither national nor EU laws regulate bonnet height. T&E is now calling on the European Commission to impose a cap of 85cm.
T&E says this height would give some protection to 95% of adult female pedestrians involved in crashes, as they would be struck below their centre of gravity, increasing their risk of survival.
The NGO is also calling on the EU to introduce child visibility tests for vehicles to reduce blind spots, and for the dimensions of cars to be included on vehicle registration certificates to inform consumer choice.
T&E also urged national governments to put higher vehicle and road taxes, as well as parking charges, on bigger cars.
Between 2012 and 2024, average bonnet height for newly sold cars in Ireland rose from 77.52cm to 83.67cm. (They’re getting fatter too.)
Jaguar Land Rover and Stellantis, manufacturer of RAM and Jeep cars, have been approached for comment.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
If one is on the inside lane beside you on a rounabout you can’t see if the way is clear or not. A nuisance.
@bruce banner: Ban tractors and trucks and vans and everything else that’s higher than your car too to avoid being a nuisance to you.
@Joe Mccarthy: Trucks and vans actually serve a purpose. These are needlessly dangerous vanity mobiles.
@Joe Mccarthy: I think the main point of the whole article was that it used to be high bonnet things were mostly work vehicles (so not as many around/ people more used to driving big yokes) now it’s everyone driving them. No one has a problem with work vehicles. The problem is some dope driving a spotless Ford Raptor to their job at the bank.
@Joe Mccarthy: Are tractors trucks and vans standard personal vehicles? Are the roads full of mostly tractors, trucks and vans?
@Stype Mann: So it’s ok by you for Trucks and Vans to hit pedestrians or children, because you deem them useful.. how morally superior of you.
@bruce banner: well if they aren’t moving the way ain’t clear, that’s pretty obvious
@Joe Mccarthy: no just common sense and bit of cop on ban SUV,s for domestic use perhaps. There’s no reason someone should have an SUV for domestic use the only reason I can see someone owning an SUV Ford Ranger for domestic use is to show off the size of your bank balance or Debt sheet. I can understand a farmer owning such a vehicle and I can’t understand a tradie having to have one but obviously there’s a need and a want.
@Rian Smallbone: Rangerovers are not called Chelsea Tractors for nothing. If everyone started driving tractors to work, we’d also have a problem. But we somehow normalised the practice of driving dangerous utility vehicles to jobs that don’t require them. Time to stop this.
@Joe Mccarthy: Trucks and vans are a necessity for work. Large SUV’s are not.
@Name: Well if that’s the way, I don’t like expensive cars, let’s ban expensive Mercedes. jags, BMWs, porches etc. there is absolutely no need for them either. Actually I’ll go further, let’s ban all cars from the road altogether because I drive a Motorcycle!
@Nemethon: Maybe learn what an SUV is, Ford Ranger is a pickup truck. SUV is Hyundai Tucson, Audi Q8, Volvo XC90, etc. Many EVs are either SUV or CUV style to fit in batteries and keep boot space. Pickups unless an actual work vehicle have no justification for the average Joe. SUVs and CUVs do have have justification due to family and pets. What do you drive out of interest.
@Rian Smallbone: keep the pointless non-sequiturs coming, my friend.
@bruce banner: Another attempt to remove responsibility from the driver. My dad’s Ford Prefect had a very high bonnet. Never harmed anyone. It’s carelessness and speed that kills, not the height of a bonnet
@Henry Murphy: Fintan Pox, Buster, Basil, Linton, Rian O’ C and Doe hate it when your behind the wheel dear bruv, you are always driving up the ass of the vehicle in front of you and have cost our family a fortune, half of us are confined to a wheelchair because of you.
@Joe Mccarthy: well his name is Mr Banner in fairness
@Stype Mann: Nor are large cars and SUVs. A lot of people need them!
@conor bradley: From where did they drive the Raptor? Some people need large vehicles outside of their commute!
@Name: Range Rovers are a luxury car brand, that is why they were in Chelsea a lot, for the weekend in the country house!
People need these vehicles for various reasons. You dont and cannot know the reasons WHY people own them.
@Jason Walsh: no need to be pedantic my friend I know what’s what either way no need for big ignorant vehicles on the roads
@Henry Murphy: well then you have been duped. SUVs are not safer. In actuality they are far more dangerous in a roll over situation.
@Joe Mccarthy: let’s ban people under 5ft too.
@bruce banner:
Surely you mean the outside lane
And still no report from the journal that cyclists are a law onto themselves with no intervention from the guards with the way they abuse our footpaths with cycle lanes provided
Proximity immobilisation. Suvs are fitted with proximity sensors. Code the firmware that the vehicle cannot move forwards or backwards if it spots a wee person in range of the sensors. Not rocket science, but I’ll accept a cash alternative to my Nobel prize now thanks.
@Meh Meh: My wife’s SUV does that, and cameras activate including the one that shows the car from above. Annoying in tight traffic but the technology is already being used.
@Meh Meh: I dont know about all cars but i know mine slams on the breaks if it thinks i am about to hit something. I am sure some would find that annoying but if it stops accidents and injuries it should be in all cars.
@Paul O’Mahoney: A camera that shows the car from above????
@Me Me: https://enginepatrol.com/hybrid-suv-with-360-camera/ Most new cars have it.
@Me Me: Yes and stays on when in tight spaces.
@Meh Meh: or just ban oversized cars? Makes more sense than some tech solution. Would also help environment, public space, etc
@Name: Ours is a hybrid so that ticks the environment box. Great yoke altogether.
@Dramafree 2023: That doesn’t show the car from above!! It is an amalgam of a number of side views.
@Me Me: It does honestly I was amazed when I first saw it .I would say the view is from 20ft maybe but you can see the whole car and about 3 ft around it in all directions. There’s a 12 inch screen that splits with the overhead view in the center and separate camera views. Including front from the very bottom of the front end about 12inches off the ground. Spacex don’t have as many I’d say.
@Me Me: I did not say it did… but that is what the other contributor is referring to. The tech is there, the solutions are available. I am unsure why people want to ban bigger cars rather than make all cars safer, I know locally the suv’s are not the problem but must be a major issue elsewhere.
@Dramafree 2023: Obviously it’s a major problem in co. Begrudgery.
@Name: Ban oversized cars then? A seven seater, which some people need!
There’s more cameras and sensors on my SUV than a spaceship. Comes to a full stop as soon as anything in its vision that could be a collision. Happened once when a motorbike jolted out in front of me in traffic, so yes some are bigger but new technology counter acts what they are saying above. Of course drivers need to be aware at all times, that’s a given.
@Caroline D: You’re probably typing this as you drive lol
@SOCOMJON: you’re typing that wiggle waiting for a bus with no bus shelter in the pi**ing rain lol
Teach them all the Green Cross Code!
I don’t drive an SUV, just a normal height saloon car!
Getting an ad for a defender SUV on this article
Ban e scooters.
All for protecting children, but you would think by these reports that these cars are deliberately hitting children and pedestrians. Of course there are unfortunate accidents but pedestrians and children shouldn’t be in same space. Trucks, vans, jeeps coaches and buses are all much higher etc and would do more damage if they hit a pedestrian or child.
@Rian Smallbone: These are generally driven by people with special licences. These idiotic vehicles on the other hand are driven by a posh mammy who’s afraid of a few leaves on her driveway. No one intentionally hits a child but when you’re driving a car so high off the ground you can’t actually see pedestrians, your risk of doing so increases.
@Rian Smallbone: “pedestrians and children shouldn’t be in same space”. Good point, time to ban cars from urban environments.
@Stype Mann: B O L L O C K S!!!
@Stype Mann: not true, SUV ‘S for the purpose of accident statistics are classed with work vans and small trucks so all the workmen and contractors running amok on the roads skew the SUV statistics.
@Name: Ban cars, no we are getting to your real beliefs!
@Stype Mann: Except as you will have read in the comments. the cars are designed with tech to stop that!
Teach them the Green Cross Code! And I don’t drive an SUV.
Nearly impossible to the the RAM TRX shown in the diagram, we’re not in the USA.
I blame the cyclists
General size of new cars is ridiculous, along with indicators that are often not obvious or hard to see, Volkswagen and Audi being some of the worst offenders of that and headlights that blind other motorists.
All the talk of road safety with the onus on the motorist, but why aren’t the manufacturers made choose safety over aesthetics.
@Evan Wakefield: Investigations found that the excessive accident numbers were connected to the personality types who drive bulky cars.
@thomas molloy: investigations found that Trump and genocide supporting personality types like yourself, are horrible people with mental issues.
@Evan Wakefield: VAG vehicles probably hav one of the best lighting / signalling packages on the market, Safety taken Very Seriously with Superb Aesthetics included. Proximity & Radar sensors that over rule the driver in many ways…. Anyone that have these systems installed can probably verify they work, Especially when the occasional F u c k w i t steps into the road,like a zombie, disconnected from reality on their feckin’ phones, then Bam, car jams on & tries to throw the driver thru the windscreen… That’s when i want to get out & kick them deep in the hole!!!!!! As for the aesthetics you mention, most vehicles are now plastic & light aluminium front end for that purpose. Front end is designed to crumple up, even with light to moderate impact which in turn Hikes insurance claims!!
@Henry Murphy: Bruv, grab yourself a chair. We all had to have a chat with the doc about your mental delusions. You know you have something wrong, so at least we’ll discover its name. Sometimes you think you are Fintan, Basil, Buster, Mary Linton, Rian O’C or John Doe and we’ve witnessed you chatting to the mirror in different voices. Sometimes you have to be hard on your bruv and that’s where I’m coming from.
You’ve a better chance of surviving being run over by a suv than a car. The greater ground clearance reduces the mush effect.
SUVs have little purpose other than inflating the driver’s ego or sense of safety (in both cases it has the opposite of the desired effect). We were driving around grand in normal sized vehicles for decades until we decided to copy the Americans. Time to reverse that trend.
@Name: I smell jealousy, that’s it, “Name”. Say it like it is, pure jealousy. There are two kinds of people in this world: those who travel by SUVs and those who could, if they would.
@Name: They are great…..
@J Ven: I smell an oversized ego. They’re easy to spot when I’m happily passing them while they sit in traffic: they drive an expensive SUV.
@Name: Not really an oversized ego, I’m tall, more of a pretty younger girlfriend sitting next to me, yes, I have a big ego, and she loves it. You know what’s the difference? When I took the bus, I wasn’t a jellyman like you are. I went to college, on my own, no mom and daddy to pay for it. This isn’t the USA, going to college is possible, plumbers, carpenters, they can all afford one, but something is needed that you seem to lack: discipline.
@J Ven: haha, clearly touched a nerve there. How predictable.
@J Ven: Well said imagine driving around looking at people driving nice cars .
@Name: What nerve? Besides being a jealous man, are you not able to read too? I am happy, accomplished, I got my dream job, my children and my lady, the SUV is just a material thing, the nerve seems to be touched on your side, haters will hate. You’re not in Somalia, if you set your mind with a clear plan, you can have an SUV. We’re not talking about a private plane, just a bigger car. But it’s OK, Perhaps you need therapy to find the source of your sadness. I am happy, but I can’t help you unless you admit that you need help.
@J Ven: Love it.
@J Ven: I can well afford an SUV.. In fact the car i drive cost more than most SUVs on the road. I choose not to buy an SUV because I’m not a d**knead. People never learned to drive in SUVs and most people driving these things have no idea of their road position.. they’re off up in the la la land. And don’t get me started with on street parking and parking spaces … our road system is designed for these yolks. Jealousy.. pfft. It’s clowns like you are the problem.
@J Ven: No one’s jealous of your obese yankmobile
@Áine F: Ours is Germany
@Name: damn straight
@J Ven: they shouldn’t, unless they live in an area where it’s required. SUVs in Ireland is a massive ‘tiny p’ flex. Or women who have no life.
@Name: Maybe for you they have little purpose but they do for very many people!
@Brian: So you think driving an SUV is about money, well that is one major mistake!
@S banter: What would the rules be for that unique and impossible to actually enforce idea!
What are most of those high bumpers filled with on new cars, safety technology that’ll detect a hazard and stop the vehicle. My car will flat out not move if there is a pedestrian in front or behind, adult or child.
We have a primary school in our estate. Parents and teachers park anywhere they can. Dlrcoco dont care about the safety of the estate no matter how many times it brought up to them. Meanwhile parents do pick up and drop off huge in these huge cars. We see near misses every day. The cars park where ever they can fit and we have had neighbour waiting for ambulance and a firebrigade that can’t access the road because of the cars and specifically the SIZE of the cars and how they are parked.
@miss lojo: Sounds like an issue with your road. It seems there needs to be a double yellow line out down instead of cars being made narrower. What cars in particular are you talking about? A standard BMW 5 series is 2.15m wide. A pick-up like a wildtrak is 2.2m wide. Even a half a car like a BMW 3 series is 1.9m wide. They are all very similar. I have no issues in my estate, because the road is actually a suitable size. Unlike the road in your comment.
@Joe Willis: You sound like a city planner Joe, without seeing the said road you’re able figure it’s not the width of the several cars you mentioned but it’s actually the road, which also needs yellow lines which assume it doesn’t have, not that this would make one iota of difference as nobody cares about anyone else but themselves
@SOCOMJON: you’re right in saying that nobody cares about anyone but themselves. Maybe outside the urban areas they do, but in Dublin and other large towns, forget about it.
fffg donot care tractors speeding at 60 through towns never see gusrds around
Fix the potholed rumble axel breaker roads outside the city first.
The jelly is so sweet & strong on this article.. lol
My classic jeep is exempt from those aluminum A-Bars, I’ve the original steel cage on the front of mine, which circles the lights & indicators, ain’t no green with envy lidl car park scratches from ye 1lt tin cans on my beast..
V8 – 5lt.. ex-army classic.. cheap tax too…
Suck it up. Learn to drive, don’t let the rage consume you.. toodles hahahaha
@Julio’s Evil Twin: “My mammy said they’re just jealous!”
@Julio’s Evil Twin: 5 litre V8, at least the tax is cheap lol
@SOCOMJON: classic… €57 per year… ;)
These cars are ridiculously dangerous and only exist because they’re subject to lower safety standards and tax bands in the US. You can track sales of these cars onto a spike in road deaths in America, especially a horrific increase in numbers of children being run over by their own parents. Should never have been allowed in this country. Too big for the roads here. Worst of all, they’re routinely bought by people because they want “to feel safe” when driving ie they are nervous/poor drivers. Put the worst drivers behind the most dangerous vehicles on the road, what could go wrong?
@Stype Mann: So ban Trucks, Coaches and Buses which are much bigger and by your logic even more ‘too big’ for the road
@Rian Smallbone: Those require special licences to drive and rightly so. SUVs are truck sized but subject to car licensing. It’s a nonsense. They are regularly bought by the worst drivers on the road who are desperate to feel “safe” and putting everyone else on the road in danger.
@Stype Mann: Almost all car drivers in this country whether in an SUV or not are terrible drivers period. When you make claims that SuV’s are Truck sized you lose any credibility in your argument. Good day sir.
@Stype Mann: If anyone wants further info on why this change in law is not just needed but long overdue, watch the video “These Stupid Trucks are Literally Killing Us” on YouTube. Very long but well-researched and informative. You can’t watch that and still think there’s a place on the road for these things.
@Stype Mann: ‘You tube’ lol.. what next Twitter?? I say let’s ban all cars from the road altogether because I drive a Motorbike!
@Rian Smallbone: Oh dear Rian you’re showing your ignorance with these comments.
@Stype Mann: I remember it been said back in the day that Volvo drivers were the worst because they felt ‘safe’ and ‘secure’. The rest of us drove around in cars that turned into an accordian in the event of a collision.
@Stype Mann: ah here, will ya stop sniffing your own underwear & come out of your moms basement…. Yes, there should be at least a minimum height limit to stop little aul wans with scrunched up faces & a fag stuck dead centre of the mouth that can barely see over the wheel….. & also an IQ test?….BUT, ” Horrific Increase” of Parents driving over their own kids… Jasus….Get A Grip!!! I bet you’d love one though, live a little, spend a lot ;-)
@Stype Mann:A 16 year old who has never stepped foot inside a car in their life is allowed to drive a 12 tonne tractor and pull 8 tonne behind them. All they need to do is do a theory test. Should we ban tractors since they are death machines?
@Joe Willis: That should definitely be stopped. It’s absolutely insane. Made sense when tractors were little yokes like the Massey 168. The things being driven now are more like an M1 Abrams. Tractors don’t need to be banned but the licencing around them should definitely be brought into this century.
@Rico: From 1989 to 1998, there were 15 deaths of children being run over by SUVs. From 1999 to 2008, it multiplied by over 20, with 304 cases. In the years 2009 to 2018, it went up again to 575. The most common place for these children to be run over was in the driveway of their own home.
@Stype Mann: US car regulations and EU regulations are completely different. Most of these cars are nowhere near as big as a US vehicle.
@Stype Mann: All of your Daft Data seems to be U.S Based…The land of Exageration, The land of Looking @ your own Sibling & thinking, hymm, I May Have A Chance Here….. This is Europe, This Specific Article is Ireland, Try & quote Legitamite figures here without your Petty Rants….Anyway, Most people have their kids play in the Back Garden, Not the driveway…. Unless the State provided you with your home, Which could explain your Bitterness towards people that can afford themselves a little bit of luxury which they more than likely Earned….Rather than Scabbed off the State…..
All kids and pedestrians need to be taller.
Problem solved.
Who comes up.with this rubbish I bet more children have died hit by cars than SUVs
Tell me you’re a sore loser who blames everything in everyone else without telling me you’re a loser. Picking on SUVs. If I can’t have one, then no one else can. Try banning pretty ladies while we’re at it, because no matter what, you won’t get that either, why? Because of the point above.
@J Ven: aside from the likes of Lucrezia, pretty ladies don’t tend to be dangerous
This is hilarious
I’m 5.10 and still feel rather small when walking behind or in front of these. I also really don’t see the point of them, has the average driver and their family grow so fat and tall that they need these monsters? I used to fit two car seats, a buggy and a child bike in a Fiat Punto, I still have a smallish car despite ferrying two tall teenagers. In the country where roads are so narrow you almost have to park on the ditch to let other drivers pass, I really can’t see how these cars can fit. And let’s not even talk about car parks.
@Anne WG: woman driver
More left-wing liberal nonsense and another projection of the Nanny state now picking on SUV’s.All of these government funded NGO’s ever come up with is spurious studies that all require tax rise to solve.Always identifying a problem that does not exist to justify their existence.Trucks and lorries have high bonnets too,so do we increase taxes on them too or ban them?
@Coldfilter Coldfilter: You’re more than welcome to move over to that kip across the Atlantic and drive your SUV around the roads that were actually designed for them over there.
@Coldfilter Coldfilter: This problem definitely does exist. It’s been created by a ridiculous loophole in the US that incentivises people to buy these ridiculously dangerous cars. They give their drivers less control, less field of vision, less protection in the event of a crash, and make mincemeat of anything they hit. A Focus, Golf or Punto being hit by one of these things is toast, and a pedestrian, instead of being hit onto the bonnet, is mangled under the wheels. They are yank mobiles, and should stay over there.
@Stype Mann: Yank Mobiles….. My GERMAN vehicle is Fantastic, Punto’s shouldn’t be on the road anyway, They are the Rat of the car population… Take one for a test drive & i bet your face will resemble your profile pic :-)
Great idea. In a generation, the cars have gotten so big. Used to be if ya got hit, ya go up on the bonnet. These new SUVs kill ya when they hit ya. Defo a case for a ban.
@Peter Cummins: Don’t cars do the same?
This nonsense ” Sports Utility Vehicle” came from America where the manufacturers saw an opportunity to increase margins over people carriers. The majority of collisions over there are from these SUV’s. Bring back estates.
@Ciaran Enright: I have an SUV….. Estate, Feckin Marvelous, 7 adults no problem, like you said, Majority of Collisions Over There….. You’re point being???? Oh yeah, A Little Bit Of Food For Thought, Most of the Horrible SUV’S you Grumble about are European & Further East…… You up for a quick game of knowledge??
1 Where are Hyundai from?
Where are Kia from??
Mercedes?
Audi?
VW?
Porsche?
Seat?
BYD?
Mitsubishi?
Might be time to get mommy to make you a hot coco & head up to her box room to be tucked in for a good nights sleep……Sleep Well Precious…….
I was driving my dad’s 2007 Toyota auris a size up from the Yaris and we pulled behind a ford Anglia at the traffic lights, he remembers he had one of them in 1976 I remembered it to I thought it was a big car at the time he couldn’t believe how wide cars had gotten, the Toyota auris was nearly twice its width you would be shoulder to shoulder in it judging by the guy driving it. the ford Anglia leads to the ford focus of today.
@brendan C5: would you ever Feckoff….. The Auris is about 12 inches wider than an Anglia, ( Nowhere Near Twice The Size…)They’re Both Jockstraps on wheels when you’re 6’6″…….Remember, in 1976 Your Arse was no more bigger than a Shirt Button…….Nice to see Daddy still provides your transportation circa 39 years later:-)
Watch Vroom Doom on YouTube about the psychology of the rise in popularity of the SUV. Very interesting video.
People are buying what is being marketed to them. Heavy advertising of cross overs and SUV’s by the manufacturers. They provide the biggest margin to manufacturers so that’s what they push. Traditional small cars are disappearing from the market because of this. Ford no longer makes the Fiesta for example.
Maybe before drastic measures on subs, look at all the cars that have modified the driver’s seat to the point where they can barely see above the steering wheel.
The minister for transport needs to deal with the proliferation of SUVS on our roads another idea for the Minister is get rid of boy racer cars. I can’t understand what’s the fascination with boys and girls driving cars that sound like tractors with dump valves etc.
As a gentleman who enjoys a morning stroll,I will always tip my hat to a pretty lady. If the good woman reciprocates by raising her bonnet,I will gladly receive such a mannerly gesture,and continue my perambulation with an added pep in my step. Only a cad or a ragamuffin would rebuff this behaviour in modern day society.
But I need my extravagant XL Range Rover. I enjoy looking at the peasants from my high pedestal.
Who tf needs an SUV in Ireland, seriously. Parking spaces dont accommodate them as they’re useless here. Just lack of brains and want of balls. Get a teeny Sportscar yo show off ffs.
A special additional theory test and driving test should be a prerequisite to driving vehicles like these, just the same as truck drivers must pass to ensure safety.
Nonsense, all these cars have sensors, cameras and proximity warnings now, so you don’t need to see if something is directly in front or behind you when stationary. The higher vantage point gives far better visibility at all other times…..
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Non-TCF/GVL Vendors
have your say