This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 12 °C Tuesday 4 August, 2020

Three building firms paid protection money to drug dealer, court hears

One of the companies that hired the two men was building houses for Dublin City Council.


A KNOWN CRIMINAL and his associate are alleged to have extorted money from companies, including one building houses for Dublin City Council, by offering them protection from anti-social behaviour in return for thousands of euro per week.

Justice Carmel Stewart at the High Court yesterday found that over €250,000 in four bank accounts linked to Derek O’Driscoll is the proceeds of crime.

The Criminal Assets Bureau (CAB) seized the bank accounts in December 2018 and Justice Stewart’s order means that the money will be kept by the State.

During yesterday’s hearing Benedict O’Floinn SC, acting for the State, told Justice Stewart that gardaí and the Chief Bureau Officer at CAB had made statements detailing O’Driscoll’s involvement in drug dealing in Ballyfermot and the wider Dublin area.

Gardaí had also detailed the activities of David Reilly, an associate of O’Driscoll who gardaí said worked as an “enforcer” in O’Driscoll’s organisation.

He said the two men’s lifestyles, which included foreign holidays, expensive cars and properties were financed by drug dealing, extortion and offences under the tax code.

He further detailed statements gardaí took from representatives of three building firms who said they had hired O’Driscoll, of Croftwood Grove, Ballyfermot or his associate David Reilly of Croftwood Park after suffering ongoing anti-social behaviour at their sites in the Ballyfermot-Cherry Orchard area of Dublin.

One of the companies that hired Reilly and O’Driscoll was building houses for Dublin City Council and another was building for Co-Operative Housing Ireland.

Mr O’Floinn said the court could ask, “What is going on in this city that Dublin City Council and building companies would see it as appropriate that individuals such as the respondents should be paid simply so that housing can be built in the areas that need it most.”

‘Serious criminality’ 

Mr O’Driscoll and Mr Reilly denied involvement in criminality and John Noonan BL, on their behalf, told the court that the money was legitimately obtained for “fence maintenance”, a service provided to the building companies.

Delivering her judgment, Justice Stewart said she accepts there are reasonable grounds for the evidence of the CAB’s Chief Officer who said that he believes O’Driscoll and Reilly are involved in “serious criminality”.

In particular, Mr O’Driscoll is involved in the distribution of drugs in the Ballyermot and wider Dublin area, she said.

She noted that once Mr O’Driscoll and Mr Reilly became involved in security at the sites the anti-social behaviour stopped.

One company had paid €1,500 per week for the service and another had paid €1,200 per week.

A company with a site at the junction of Blackditch Road and Orchard Lawns had suffered “an ongoing series of incidents”.

Mr Reilly’s name was offered to them by locals and within half an hour Mr Reilly met someone from the site. Justice Stewart said the anti-social behaviour at the site appeared to have ceased immediately.

She said Mr O’Driscoll’s accounts had received large sums of money that “appear to come from extortion”.

She said that if he were operating a legitimate fencing business you would expect the company would have tools and equipment and VAT records.

She said the building companies that handed over the money were trying to operate legitimate businesses and had to do something to protect their sites and machinery.

She added: “They had no choice but to pay this money in order to acquire protection, safety and security to continue the legitimate work they had been contracted to do.”

She noted that gardaí had named Mr Reilly as a “trusted member” and an “enforcer” in Mr O’Driscoll’s organisation.

She said she was not satisfied that the respondents had offered legitimate explanations for how the money came to be in their possession and ordered that it be kept by the State under Section 3 of the Criminal Assets Bureau Act.

She also ordered that a mobile home and a horse box that was seized by CAB officers arising from the same operation be kept by the State.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

About the author:

Eoin Reynolds

Read next: