Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo cunaplus via Shutterstock
illness

Sick air travelers are mostly likely to infect those in the next row, study reveals

Researchers also warned that infectious crew members could infect an average of 4.6 passengers per flight.

PEOPLE WHO FLY on airplanes while contagious can indeed get other people sick, but the risk is mainly to those seated next to them or in the adjacent row, US researchers have said.

The study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) is the first to quantify the odds of getting sick based on a passenger’s proximity to an infectious person.

Researchers studied 10 transcontinental flights and meticulously tracked passenger movements to estimate the likelihood of common respiratory infections like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and influenza, which are spread by tiny droplets in the air and on surfaces.

“Passengers seated within one row and within two seats laterally of the infected passenger had an 80% or greater probability of becoming infected,” said the study.

“For all other passengers, the probability of infection was less than 3%.”

Researchers also warned that infectious crew members could infect an average of 4.6 passengers per flight.

“Thus, it is imperative that flight attendants not fly when they are ill,” said the study led by researchers at Emory University and the Georgia Institute of Technology.

The good news is that public health guidelines typically go even further, urging those seated within two rows of an infected passenger to undergo surveillance for certain contagious diseases.

“The authors’ model argues that it requires you to be closer than previously reported – within one row and two seats of an infected passenger – as opposed to two rows regarding greatest risk of becoming ill on an airplane,” said Lenox Hill Hospital emergency physician Robert Glatter, who was not involved in the study.

“But the risk was significantly less if you were seated beyond two rows of an infected person who was coughing or sneezing. This runs counter to traditional thinking that if a person coughs or sneezes anywhere in the cabin, they will infect the entire plane.”

Public health concern

The study, which was conducted during flu season, reported only one person actively coughing, “which is often not the experience of the flying public”, Glatter added.

Swabs for respiratory viruses on tray tables and seatbelts also showed no trace of viruses, suggesting that most illness is spread by sneezing and coughing, not droplets that fall on surfaces or the ground.

“Meticulous attention to hand washing, or using hand sanitizer remain important ways to reduce your risk of becoming ill during air travel,” said Glatter.

Travelling while contagious is “an important public health concern” given that three billion passengers per year travel by air, said the report.

In 2014, a woman who was infected with Ebola flew from Cleveland to Dallas the night before she was hospitalised.

Her trip raised alarm about the prospect of a public health emergency, but luckily, no one was infected.

According to Michael Grosso, chair of paediatrics at Northwell Health’s Huntington Hospital in Huntington, New York, the study helps clarify what has long been rumoured.

“I think everyone knows that travellers often experience the onset of a cold within a couple of days after flying and they naturally connect the two,” he said.

“The bad news is that travel websites have no option which says, ‘click here to find a seat at least three away from an influenza sufferer’.”

© – AFP 2018

Read: Myth debunked: Neither the low-carb nor the low-fat diet is superior

More: New blood and urine tests can indicate autism in children earlier

Your Voice
Readers Comments
8
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel