TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

34 consultants rapped for treating more private patients than public ones

Almost three-dozen consultants employed by the state spent more time treating private patients than public ones.

34 consultants were investigated last year after the HSE discovered that they were treating more private patients than public ones.
34 consultants were investigated last year after the HSE discovered that they were treating more private patients than public ones.
Image: 401K via Flickr

HEALTH MINISTER James Reilly has revealed that 34 consultants on the payroll of the public health services have been reprimanded for building up workloads where they treated more patients in their private practices than public patients.

The consultants’ employers engaged with the consultants after it emerged that they were in breach of official rules on public-private treatment ratios, which oblige most consultants to limit their private consultancies to 30 per cent of their total workload.

In 32 cases, the matters were resolved to the satisfaction of the Health Service Executive – but in two cases consultants who did not reduce their private ratio to an acceptable deemed acceptable by the HSE had their private practice rights suspended.

“In line with the terms of the contract, one of these consultants has remitted the excess private fee income into a research and study fund in the hospital concerned,” Reilly said.

The HSE’s investigations follow rules introduced in 2008 which meant that newly-appointed consultants were told they could only spend 20 per cent of their time treating patients on a private basis.

Consultants who were on contract before 2008 were allowed to maintain their previous ratio of 30 per cent.

In a written response to Fianna Fáil health spokesman Billy Kelleher, Reilly said the HSE was now proceeding to take action against consultants in breach of the 30 per cent ratio.

The minister said the HSE’s engagement with consultants and medical unions had resulted in a “significant improvement in the level of compliance with the public practice rules”.

Records published late last year showed that over 700 public patients had been referred to the National Treatment Purchase Fund by consultants acting in a public capacity – only for the patient to then be referred to the same consultant on a private basis.

This was despite NRPF rules stipulating that patients whose private healthcare bills were being covered by the fund should not be treated by the same consultant doctor who had seen them through the public system.

Read: Hundreds of patients referred to private fund – only to be seen by same consultant >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • What does ‘rapped’ mean, Daddy? Well, son, it means they can do it again for as long as they please.

    Reply
  • These consultants need to be investigated. My son was attending temple street private clinic for his sight. Say 1 appointment every 6 months at €180 a pop, and an invitation back each time. When I lost my job and asked to go public, on his first visit as a public patient we were told ” he doesn’t need glasses any more”, by the same person. I’m awaiting a response from the ministers office. Won’t hold my breath though.

    Reply
  • What will it take for our elected representatives to stop this stealing from our Health Budget . These consultants should be fined , named and shamed . This is killing people who should have had treatment !

    Reply
  • Who is going to sort this out? Our Minister for Health who spent years representing these consultants to ensure they are in a position to milk the system .. O’Reilly is to the Health Service what FF were to the Development industry …..

    Reply
  • Name an’ shame them!

    Reply
  • Private medical care is totally unregulated and they think they can do what they like.

    Reply
  • CJS 18/02/12 #

    This in unbelievable. Why don’t consultants work for the state – full stop. My employer doesn’t let me work for myself 20/30% of the time.

    Reply
  • As was posted already it should be either or if you work for the public you work for the public and that’s it of course they will see more private patients what pays more. The HSE is a black hole that money just flows into. It’s front line workers the junior doctors and the nurses that take the abuse for this flawed state body.

    Reply
  • terry 18/02/12 #

    Consultants should work full time for the state simple. This 30 per cent rule is a rule to be abused and is difficult to police. I am fairly right wing on the majority of topics but it is only equitable in society for health and education to be in complete public ownership privatise everything else.

    Reply
    • They can decide themselves if they want to work for the public or the private sector. We are still living in a country that hasn’t full dictatorship yet and consultants have a right to decide their own careers. I agree that they should abide by their contracts with the HSE but what they do outside of that is their own business.

      Reply
    • jimmy 20/02/12 #

      yeah terry privatise everything else… yeah just privatise water, transport, electricity, education ect….. big corporations really care more about the people rather than making money. MAXAMISE PROFIT AND CUT SPENDING thats the people i want running the structure on our society ! well done terry !

      Reply
  • Outrageous – We need a health service that is run for the benefit of all patients, regardless of income. And as long as we continue with our current two tier system, such abuses as described above will continue.

    Reply
  • I’m no fan of two tier medicine but it’s not simple. Most admissions are through a/e. 50% are ‘private’ i.e. insured. Are they to be turned away because consultants are ‘over quota’? Who turns them away? If ‘private’ a/e patients are forced to go public – to fit the ‘quota’- it will cost them €75 a night HSE public bed charge, and hospital looses insurance income of a few hundred a night. The whole idea is unworkable- developed when private co-located ‘for profit’ hospital plans were in full swing. Of course NTPF patients could get treated by same consultants -because consultant’s public operating lists are being cancelled wholesale on a weekly basis all over the country due to beds taken up by a/e patients i.e. not enough beds in public hospitals. Consultants, gagged from speaking out by contract clauses, are the convenient but wrong target for this particular mess.

    Reply
  • What are the consultants meant to do? Stop treating the patients? No background to this story to make sense of it. If the Health Shambles Executive functioned efficiently, why is it being abolished?

    Reply
  • So the fact is of the 34 that were highlighted, 32 were settled, and out of a population of all the consultants in the country, 2, yes, 2, were rapped by the HSE. Quality journalism by http://www.TheJournal.ie.

    Reply
  • Contrast this with the NTC sackings reported earlier. NTC staff were rightly fired for gross misconduct. Consultants in flagrant breach of their contract for personal financial gain should also be fired and be barred from practising any form of medicine in this country.

    Reply

Add New Comment